ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2004/961

Income Tax

Consolidation: meaning of the term 'the company' in Item 4 in the table in subsection 707-320(2) of the Income Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) in the context of a multiple entry consolidated (MEC) group
FOI status: may be released
CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Where a MEC group is in existence, does 'the company' in Item 4 in the table in subsection 707-320(2) of the ITAA 1997 refer to the entire MEC group rather than an individual member of the MEC group?

Decision

Yes, 'the company' in Item 4 in the table in subsection 707-320(2) of the ITAA 1997 refers to the MEC group rather than an individual member of the MEC group.

Facts

Aus Co 1, Aus Co 2 and Aus Co 3 are eligible tier-1 companies of a MEC group with Aus Co 1 as the head company.

Aus Co 1 had carried forward tax losses which were transferred to itself (under Subdivision 707-A of the ITAA 1997) as the head company of the MEC group. Some of the tax losses in this bundle of losses will be utilised under the available fraction method.

Subsequent to the date of consolidation, Aus Co 1 issued additional shares to a foreign company within the wholly-owned group for cash consideration.

Reasons for Decision

Item 4 in the table in subsection 707-320(2) of the ITAA 1997 is one of the adjusting events whereby existing available fractions are reduced or maintained by multiplying them by the factor identified in the relevant item. Item 4 involves an increase in the market value of the company to which the losses in the bundle were most recently transferred as a result of a post-consolidation injection of capital or non-arm's length transaction.

The reference to 'the company' in Item 4 in the table in subsection 707-320(2) of the ITAA 1997 is interpreted as a reference to the MEC group as a single entity. The single entity rule in section 701-1 of the ITAA 1997 states that subsidiary members of a consolidated group are taken for head company core purposes and entity core purposes to be parts of the head company of the group, rather than separate income tax entities. Therefore, 'the company' is Aus Co 1 in its capacity as the head company of the MEC group and, by virtue of the single entity rule, the subsidiary members are parts of Aus Co 1. The 'market value of the company' in Item 4 in the table in subsection 707-320(2) is a reference to the market value of the entire MEC group.

The single entity rule applies in the context of a MEC group through the operation of section 719-2 of the ITAA 1997. This section provides that the provisions relating to consolidated groups (other than Divisions 703 and 719 of the ITAA 1997) have the same effect in relation to MEC groups. Therefore, references made to a consolidated group in Division 707 of the ITAA 1997 are to be read as a reference to a MEC group.

Section 719-25 of the ITAA 1997 ensures that the single entity rule can apply appropriately to a MEC group by providing that the remaining members of a MEC group, other than the head company, are the subsidiary members of the group.

The single entity rule applies in the context of subsection 707-320(2) of the ITAA 1997 as this provision is within the meaning of the head company core purposes. In particular, the subsection operates to reduce or maintain the available fraction for a bundle of losses. Available fractions are used to determine the limits for utilisation of transferred losses by the head company of a consolidated group. As this affects the working out of the head company's liability for income tax for income years post-consolidation, it falls within the meaning of head company core purposes.

There is no legislative intention to override the single entity rule in respect of Item 4 in the table in subsection 707-320(2) of the ITAA 1997. This is supported by the Explanatory Memorandum to the New Business Tax System (Consolidation) Bill (No. 1) 2002, which states at paragraph 8.61:

A group's available fractions are adjusted if the group's market value is increased as a result of capital injected into the group or a non-arm's length transaction involving the group.
and at paragraph 8.96:
Post-consolidation, the events are only relevant if they trigger an increase in the market value of the whole group. This can only occur in this context as a result of an injection of capital or non-arm's length transaction involving entities external to the group.

Further, there is a note after subsection 707-320(1) of the ITAA 1997 which states that:

The value for the transferee will be worked out on the basis that subsidiary members of the consolidated group headed by the transferee are part of the transferee, because of section 701-1 (the single entity rule).

Although this note is in respect of the market value of the transferee as part of the calculation of the available fraction for a bundle of losses, it signals the intention that the single entity rule applies throughout section 707-320 of the ITAA 1997.

Thus, 'the company' in Item 4 in the table in subsection 707-320(2) is Aus Co 1 in its capacity as the head company of the MEC group, rather than on a stand-alone basis.

Date of decision:  1 December 2004

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 2004

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   Division 703
   Division 707
   Subdivision 707-A
   section 701-1
   section 707-320
   subsection 707-320(1)
   subsection 707-320(2)
   Division 719
   section 719-2
   section 719-25

Other References:
Explanatory Memorandum to the New Business Tax System (Consolidation) Bill (No. 1) 2002

Keywords
Available fraction
Bundle of losses
Consolidation
Consolidation - event
Consolidation - losses
Consolidation - market value
Consolidation - multiple entry consolidated group
Consolidation - non-arm's length transaction
Consolidation - tax liabilities
Eligible tier-1 company
Injection of capital
Head company of a MEC group
Single entity rule
Subsidiary member of a MEC group
Transferred losses

Siebel/TDMS Reference Number:  4290975

Business Line:  Consolidation Centre of Expertise

Date of publication:  10 December 2004

ISSN: 1445-2782


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).