ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2005/186
Goods and Services Tax
GST and refinancing hire purchase agreements as leasesFOI status: may be released
This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:
If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.
Issue
Does the entity, a financier, need to make an adjustment to reduce the input tax credit it claimed for the acquisition of a luxury car to reflect the car input tax credit limit under section 69-10 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) when:
- •
- it on-supplied the luxury car under a hire purchase agreement, and
- •
- it terminates that hire purchase agreement and leases the car instead?
Decision
No, the entity does not need to make an adjustment to reduce the input tax credit it claimed for the acquisition of a luxury car to reflect the car input tax credit limit under section 69-10 of the GST Act when it terminates the hire purchase agreement and leases the car instead.
Facts
The entity is a financier that is registered for goods and services tax (GST).
The entity acquired a luxury car for the purpose of supplying it to customers by way of hire purchase agreement. In accordance with the A New Tax System (Luxury Car Tax) Act 1999 (LCT Act), the entity quoted their Australian business number (ABN) in relation to the supply of the luxury car to it. The entity's acquisition of the luxury car was a creditable acquisition and the entity claimed an input tax credit. The input tax credit claimed was equal to the GST payable on the supply of the luxury car to the entity.
The entity supplied the vehicle to a customer under a hire purchase agreement. However, before all the payments under the agreement were made, the hire purchase agreement was terminated. The entity retains title to the vehicle and subsequently leases the vehicle to the customer.
Reasons for Decision
Section 69-10 of the GST Act provides that if an entity makes a creditable acquisition or importation of a car that exceeds the car limit, the amount of the input tax credit the entity is entitled to is limited to the GST payable on the supply or importation up to one-eleventh of the car limit, unless the entity is entitled to quote its ABN for the purposes of the LCT Act.
Under paragraph 9-5(1)(a) of the LCT Act, an entity is entitled to quote its ABN in relation to a supply of a luxury car if, at the time of quoting, the entity has the intention of using the car for the sole purpose of holding the car as trading stock, other than holding it for hire or lease. For a quote to be effective, it must be in the approved form and made at or before the time of the supply or importation (subsection 9-15(2) of the LCT Act).
Paragraphs 194 and 198 of Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2000/29 makes it clear that a hire purchase agreement is not a hire arrangement. Hence, the entity acquired a luxury car for the purpose of supplying it to a customer by way of hire purchase agreement and not for hire or lease. Therefore, the entity was entitled to, and did, quote their ABN at the time of the supply of the luxury car to it and consequently the car input tax credit limit in section 69-10 of the GST Act did not apply. Although at a later time the entity's intention changed, this does not alter fact that the entity was entitled to quote at the relevant time. Section 69-10 does not require an adjustment to be made if the intended use changes.
In addition, the adjustment rules in Division 19 and Division 129 of the GST Act do not apply as the entity's acquisition of the car has not been cancelled, there has been no change in the consideration the entity provided to the supplier, the acquisition remains a creditable acquisition and the entity is still using the car wholly for a creditable purpose.
Therefore, the entity does not need to make an adjustment to reduce the input tax credit it claimed for the acquisition of a luxury car under section 69-10 of the GST Act.
Legislative References:
A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999
section 9-5
Division 19
section 69-10
Division 129
paragraph 9-5(1)(a)
subsection 9-15(2)
Related Public Rulings (including Determinations)
Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2000/29
Keywords
Goods and services tax
GST net amounts and adjustments
Adjustments
GST hire purchase
GST Luxury Car Tax Stream
ISSN: 1445-2782
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).