ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2005/46

Excise

• This document has changed over time. View its history.

Issue

Is a refund of excise duty allowed under section 78 of the Excise Act 1901 on goods which have been delivered to a customer but are claimed not to have been ordered?

Decision

No. A refund of excise duty is not allowed under section 78 of the Excise Act on goods which have been delivered to a customer but are claimed not to have been ordered.

Facts

A licensee accepts an order for excisable goods. The licensee raises an invoice/picking slip, enters the goods for home consumption, pays the excise duty and delivers the goods to the customer.

When the goods are delivered, the customer states that there has been a misunderstanding and that the goods were not ordered.

The goods are returned to the licensed premises.

Reasons for Decision

Section 78 of the Excise Act provides that a refund of excise duty may be allowed:

•

In respect of excisable goods generally or in respect of the goods included in a class of excisable goods, and

•

In prescribed circumstances, and subject to such conditions and restrictions (if any), that relate to excisable goods generally or to the goods included in a class of excisable goods.

Subregulation 50(1) of the Excise Regulations 1925 specifies the circumstances under which a refund of excise duty may be made. The only circumstance that is relevant in this instance is paragraph 50(1)(c) of the subregulation which requires excise duty to have been paid 'through manifest error of fact'.

There are two ways in which this licensee may have entered the excisable goods and paid the requisite duty.

Under section 58 of the Excise Act, the licensed manufacturer or owner may make an entry and pay the requisite duty in respect of excisable goods. The goods may then be lawfully removed from the licensed premises.

Under section 61C of the Excise Act, a Collector may give written permission to the owner of excisable goods to deliver those goods from the CEO's control without having entered the goods or paid the duty. Where goods are delivered on this basis, they are deemed under subsection 61C(2) of the Excise Act to have been entered for home consumption on the day on which they are delivered. Where a periodic settlement permission is in place, subsection 61C(3) of the Excise Act empowers the CEO to impose requirements that the owner/manufacturer must satisfy. The CEO normally requires a return to be lodged on a weekly basis detailing all the movements that have taken place under the permission and remitting the duty payable.

Regardless of whether the licensee entered the goods prior to delivering them from the licensed premises, or delivered them under a periodic settlement permission, it is clear that the licensee entered the goods and paid the requisite duty. The goods have also been shipped from the licensed premises.

The fact that the goods were subsequently returned to the licensed premises does not change the fact that the goods were lawfully cleared from the CEO's control. Therefore, the duty was properly paid and there has not been a manifest error of fact.

Accordingly, it is clear that a refund of excise duty is not allowed under section 78 of the Excise Act on goods which have been delivered to a customer but are claimed not to have been ordered.

Legislative References:
Excise Act 1901
   section 58
   section 61C
   subsection 61C(2)
   subsection 61C(3)
   section 78

Keywords
Alcohol excise
Excise
Excise payments other

Business Line:  Indirect Tax

Date of publication:  18 February 2005

ISSN: 1445-2782