ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2006/275

Income Tax

Capital Allowances: second element of cost - balancing adjustment event - reasonably attributable costs
FOI status: may be released

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Does the taxpayer's capital expenditure on demolishing and removing their timber mill buildings form part of the second element of cost of those assets under paragraph 40-190(2)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Decision

Yes. The taxpayer's capital expenditure on demolishing and removing their timber mill buildings does form part of the second element of cost of those assets under paragraph 40-190(2)(b) of the ITAA 1997 because the timber mill buildings are depreciating assets to which Division 40 of the ITAA 1997 applies and the expenditure is reasonably attributable to a balancing adjustment event occurring for those assets.

Facts

The taxpayer ceased to carry on their business of milling timber for a taxable purpose.

The taxpayer incurred capital expenditure on demolishing and removing their timber mill buildings as part of various activities to return the land to its natural state. The expenditure was incurred after 30 June 2005.

Reasons for Decision

Timber mill buildings are depreciating assets within the meaning of that term in section 40-30 of the ITAA 1997. However, Division 40 of the ITAA 1997 does not apply to depreciating assets that are capital works if the taxpayer can deduct, or could deduct in certain specified circumstances, amounts for the works under Division 43 of the ITAA 1997 (subsection 40-45(2) of the ITAA 1997). While timber mill buildings are capital works within the meaning of that term in section 43-20 of the ITAA 1997, amounts cannot generally be deducted for them under Division 43 of the ITAA 1997 because capital expenditure in respect of their construction or acquisition is specifically excluded from construction expenditure upon which the deduction is based (subparagraphs 43-70(2)(f)(vi) and 43-70(2)(fa)(iii) of the ITAA 1997). It follows that the taxpayer's timber mill buildings are depreciating assets to which Division 40 of the ITAA 1997 applies.

Paragraph 40-190(2)(b) of the ITAA 1997 includes in the second element of cost of a depreciating asset capital expenditure that is reasonably attributable to a balancing adjustment event occurring for the asset. When the taxpayer demolished and removed their timber mill buildings, a balancing adjustment event occurred for those assets under paragraph 40-295(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 because the assets ceased to exist and the taxpayer stopped holding them. The cost of demolishing and removing the timber mill buildings is directly and integrally attributable to the balancing adjustment event that occurred for the assets.

Accordingly, the taxpayer's capital expenditure on demolishing and removing their timber mill buildings does form part of the second element of cost of those assets under paragraph 40-190(2)(b) of the ITAA 1997 because the timber mill buildings are depreciating assets to which Division 40 of the ITAA 1997 applies and the expenditure is reasonably attributable to the balancing adjustment occurring for those assets.

Date of decision: 15 August 2006

Year of income: Year ended 30 June 2006

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   Division 40
   section 40-30
   subsection 40-45(2)
   paragraph 40-190(2)(b)
   paragraph 40-295(1)(a)
   Division 43
   section 43-20
   subparagraph 40-70(2)(f)(vi)
   subparagraph 43-70(2)(fa)(iii)

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2006/276

Keywords
Balancing adjustment event
Depreciating assets
Second element of cost
Timber industry
Timber mill buildings
Uniform capital allowances system

Siebel/TDMS Reference Number: 5241494

Business Line: Public Groups and International

Date of publication: 29 September 2006

ISSN: 1445-2782

Copyright notice

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).