ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2007/202
Excise
Excise: beer used in the manufacture of a non-excisable productFOI status: may be released
This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:
If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.
Issue
Can an entity that manufactures beer, use that beer to make another product that is not excisable without paying excise duty on the beer?
Decision
No, an entity that manufactures beer cannot use that beer to manufacture another product that is not excisable without paying excise duty on that beer.
Facts
The entity is licensed to manufacture excisable goods pursuant to Part IV of the Excise Act 1901 (Excise Act).
The entity manufactures beer as defined in the Schedule to the Excise Tariff Act 1921 (Excise Tariff Act). The beer is fit for human consumption.
The beer is used as an ingredient in the manufacture of a non-beverage food product that is not an excisable good.
The manufacture of the beer and the manufacture of the food product are undertaken at the same premises.
Reasons for Decision
Section 5 of the Excise Tariff Act imposes excise duty on goods that are specified in the Schedule to that Act and which are manufactured or produced in Australia.
Item 1 in the Schedule to the Excise Tariff Act specifies that excise duty is applicable to beer and provides various rates of duty dependent upon the strength of the beer and the size of the container in which the beer is packaged.
The Commissioner is cognisant of the fact that the entity commercially manufactures non-excisable goods for sale, with the manufacture of the beer undertaken solely for the purpose of achieving that end. Notwithstanding that the entity does not manufacture beer for sale, the beer is an excisable good on which duty is imposed.
Pertinent to this entity then, is whether the Excise Act or Excise Tariff Act contains a provision allowing the Commissioner to give permission to the entity to use the beer without paying duty. Section 77D of the Excise Act allows for the delivery of certain beer to be used for manufacturing purposes without an entry for home consumption and without paying duty. However section 77D is limited to beer that is unfit for human consumption. That is not the situation in this case.
Other provisions of the Excise Act or Excise Tariff Act allow the Commissioner to grant approval to a person to use certain excisable goods for specified purposes. For example, section 77FF of the Excise Act allows the Commissioner to grant approval to a person to use spirits for specified industrial, manufacturing scientific, medical, veterinary or educational purposes. Spirit subject to such an approval is classified to subitem 3.7 in the Schedule to the Excise Tariff Act which attracts a free rate of duty. However, no such provisions have been provided for in the relevant Acts specific to beer.
Section 61 of the Excise Act provides that excisable goods are subject to the Commissioner's control until they are delivered for home consumption or for export. Section 61 also provides that a person must not, without permission, move, alter or interfere with goods subject to the Commissioner's control.
Section 24 of the Excise Act may allow for excisable goods to be used in the manufacture of other excisable goods. However as the entity is using an excisable good to manufacture a food product which is not excisable, section 24 will not apply. In the absence of a similar provision allowing the use of excisable goods in the manufacture of non-excisable goods, it can be inferred that Parliament has not intended for such manufacturing processes to be allowed without the entity being required to pay duty on those goods.
There are two ways in which the entity may account for the beer and pay the requisite duty. Section 58 of the Excise Act allows entries to be made in respect of excisable goods, and for Excise officers to pass the entries, thereby authorising the removal of the goods for home consumption. Alternatively, entities may seek permission under section 61C of the Excise Act to deliver the goods for home consumption without entering the goods. In both instances the beer must be classified to the appropriate subitem in the table in the Schedule to the Excise Tariff Act and excise duty paid accordingly.
Therefore an entity that manufactures beer cannot use the beer in the manufacture of non-excisable products without paying the appropriate excise duty on the beer.
Date of decision: 5 November 2007
Legislative References:
Excise Tariff Act 1921
section 5
Item 1 in the Schedule
section 24
section 58
section 61
section 61C
section 77D
section 77FF
Keywords
Alcohol
Alcohol excise
Beer
Beer excise
Excisable goods
Excisable goods manufacturer
Excise
Licensing
ISSN: 1445-2782
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
