Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of private ruling

Authorisation Number: 1011739194329

This edited version of your ruling will be published in the public Register of private binding rulings after 28 days from the issue date of the ruling. The attached private rulings fact sheet has more information.

Please check this edited version to be sure that there are no details remaining that you think may allow you to be identified. Contact us at the address given in the fact sheet if you have any concerns.

Ruling

Subject: Child Care Facilities

Question 1

Is the provision of child care to your employees exempt from fringe benefits tax in accordance with subsection 47(2) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986?

Answer

Yes

Question 2

If the provision of child care to your employees is exempt under subsection 47(2) of the FBTAA, will the exemption apply if the child care facility is used by an employee of another government agency?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following periods:

01 April 2010 - 31 March 2011

01 April 2011 - 31 March 2012

01 April 2012 - 31 March 2013

01 April 2013 - 31 March 2014

01 April 2014 - 31 March 2015

The scheme commences on:

01 April 2010

Relevant facts and circumstances

You executed a contract with the child care provider (the Contractor) for the provision of childcare services in the child care centre, located on your premises. After having operated the centre for a number of years you re-contracted for a further period.

A copy of the current contract between yourself and the Contractor has been provided.

The contract between you and the Contractor included the following:

Relevant legislative provisions

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 20.

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 45.

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 47(2).

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 136(1).

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Is the provision of child care to your employees exempt from fringe benefits tax in accordance with subsection 47(2) of the FBTAA?

Detailed reasoning

Under the terms of your salary sacrifice arrangements an employee is able to have child care provided to their children in the childcare centre by agreeing to a reduction in the amount of salary he or she would otherwise have received.

In establishing the child care centre you have entered into an agreement with the Contractor for the operation of the Centre.

Subsection 47(2) of the FBTAA provides that where certain conditions are met the provision of child care will be an exempt benefit.

Subsection 47(2) of the FBTAA states that:

Where:

(i)  the employer; or

the benefit is an exempt benefit.

Therefore, the provision of the child care will be an exempt benefit under subsection 47(2) if the following conditions are satisfied:

Is the benefit a residual benefit?

Section 45 of the FBTAA defines a residual benefit as:

Under the terms of the salary sacrifice agreement you will agree to provide childcare in the centre for the children of an employee. As the benefit being provided is the care of children rather than the paying or reimbursement of child care costs by the employee, the benefit will be a residual benefit.

Is the benefit provided to a current employee?

As the child care is being provided under the terms of a salary sacrifice agreement the benefit will be provided to a current employee.

Does the benefit consist of the care to the employee's children?

The contract provides that the Contractor will provide child care services to the children of your employees.

Is the care of children in a child care facility?

A child care facility is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA as:

a facility at which a person receives, or is ready to receive, 2 or more children under the age of 6, not being associates of the person, for the purpose of minding, caring for or educating them for a day or part of a day without provision for residential care but does not include a facility at the place of residence of any of those children.

This requirement is satisfied as the facility provides care for numerous children in a non residential childcare centre.

Will the child care facility be located on the business premises of the employer (or a related company if the employer is a company)?

The term "business premises" is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA as being:

Guidelines on what constitutes a business premises for the purposes of the FBTAA are provided in Taxation Ruling TR 2000/4 Fringe Benefits Tax: meaning of 'business premises' (TR 2000/4).

Paragraph 4, of TR 2000/4 states two requirements need to be met for premises to be business premises of a person. The first requirement is that the premises or part of premises are of the person. Secondly, the premises or part of premises must be used by the person, in whole or in part, for the purposes of their business operations.

Paragraphs 11 and 12 of the ruling provide that there is no absolute or conclusive test as to whether premises are business premises. In determining whether the premises are premises of the employer and are used for the business operations of the employer, it is relevant to consider:

Paragraph 13 of TR 2000/4 states:

Will the premises, or part of the premises be premises of the employer?

Paragraph 48 of TR 2000/4 states:

Merkel J in Esso Australia Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation 40 ATR 76; (1998) 157 ALR 652; 98 ATC 4953 (the Esso Case) considered the issue of a business premises, and stated:

You have entered a leasing agreement with the owner of the building for the whole area that you occupy, including the area occupied by the Child Care Centre.

As set out in paragraph 7 of TR 2000/4:

The agreement that you entered into with the Contractor does not affect the exclusive occupancy rights that arise under the lease agreement as the Contractor is only provided with a licence to access as provided for under the contract. Therefore the premises are the premises of the employer.

Will the premises be used for the business operations of the employer?

Although the premises are premises of the employer, it is also necessary for the premises to be used for the business operations of the employer.

Paragraph 17 of TR 2000/4 states:

Paragraph 20 of TR2000/4 states:

In determining whether the child care activities amount to your business activities, paragraph 53 of TR 2000/4 states:

There are also questions as to whether the premises or any part of the premises are being used for the business operations of the employer. It may be that the activities actually taking place on the premises would more properly be described as business operations of the service provider. Consequently, the facts may give rise to the inference that the premises are not the 'business premises' of the employer.

In situations where an employer engages an independent child care operator under a management agreement to care for employee's children, paragraph 57 of TR 2000/4 provides the minimum requirements which should be incorporated into the arrangement for the operations to be considered the business operations of the employer.

The Contract between you and the Contractor details:

In considering these clauses it is accepted that the agreement operates in a manner that would be expected where an employer engages a child care operator to manage the employer's child care centre.

The agreement can be terminated in the following situations:

These are accepted as being on normal commercial grounds.

This condition is met. Should the Contactor fail to provide the services in accordance with the performance standards you can engage a third party to provide the services. The Contractor must return all your material and contract material as well as provide all reasonable assistance and information to assist in the transitioning of your new services arrangements.

This condition is met as you have a lease over the entire building. The lease is separate from your arrangement with the Contractor.

The rental calculation is through a lease with a third party and is separate from the contract with the Contractor. The Contractor has access to the area set aside for child care services for a licence fee and provides child care services to the children of your employees. As stated above the child care fees reflect the market rate and the same fee is charged for the care of non-employee children.

From the information provided, this condition is met.

The employer's occupancy rights are from the lease agreement, not from the Contractor.

The contract details that if required by you a management committed must be formed which will be chaired by your representative and comprise of at least one representative from each party.

The purpose of the Committee would be to monitor and review each parties performance of the agreement, consider ways in which the child care services may be improved, assess any deficiencies, develop changes to processes and resolve complaints or issues raised by either party.

In addition to the management committee you:

Paragraph 5 of TR 2000/4 states it is a question of fact and degree as to whether particular premises are business premises of a person. In making a conclusion it is necessary to consider all of the relevant facts.

In applying TR 2000/4 to the facts of your situation it is accepted you will have the necessary control over the premises. However, as indicated in paragraph 19 of TR 2000/4 for the premises to be accepted as your business premises it is necessary to be able to distinguish your circumstances from the circumstances that exist where a member of the public approaches a community or commercial child care centre and enrols on or more of their children.

The following factors support the child care activities being part of your business operations:

Conclusion

We therefore consider that the provision of child care to your employees is part of your business operations conducted on your business premises and is therefore exempt from fringe benefits tax under subsection 47(2) of the FBTAA.

Question 2

If the provision of child care to your employees is exempt under subsection 47(2) of the FBTAA, will the exemption continue to apply if the child care facility is used by an employee of another agency?

Detailed reasoning

You have advised that there are currently children of employees from other agencies that attend your child care facility.

Paragraph 65 of TR 2000/4 states that:

As explained in paragraph 65 above, the exemption from fringe benefits tax applies to the provision of child care to the children of your employees. The use of the child care centre by employees of other agencies will not affect this exemption.

Further issues for you to consider

Depending upon the arrangement, it may be possible for the 47(2) exemption to apply if another agency enters into an agreement for child care to be provided to children of its employees. However, this exemption will not apply to an arrangement in which the employee incurs the child care expenses which are subsequently paid or reimbursed by the employer.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).