Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012756674690

Ruling

Subject: Commercial debt forgiveness and Division 7A

Question 1

Will the debt forgiveness rules in Section 245-10 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) apply to the forgiveness of an unpaid present entitlement (UPE) of a trust beneficiary of a family discretionary trust?

Answer

No

Question 2

Will the forgiveness of an unpaid present entitlement, that existed prior to 16 December 2009, cause or result in, for the purposes of Division 7A, an assessable dividend taken to have been paid by the Company to the Trust?

Answer

No

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ending 30 June 2015

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2014

Relevant facts and circumstances

The trust is a discretionary family trust.

The trust accounts show an unpaid present entitlement for a beneficiary of the trust.

The beneficiary has paid tax on these unpaid distributions as required.

The distributions were made by the trust over many years.

No interest has ever been charged and there is no interest accruing on the beneficiaries loans for the unpaid present entitlement.

Had interest been payable on any part of the debt it would not have been deductible to the Trust.

The beneficiary is a private company.

The distributions were made as unpaid present entitlements prior to 16 December, 2009.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 245-10 and

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 109F.

Reasons for decision

Section 245-35 of the ITAA 1997 states:

Section 245-10 of the ITAA 1997 states:

The term 'debt' is not defined in the income tax legislation.

Where words used have acquired a legal meaning, it will be taken that the legislature intended to use them unless a contrary intention clearly appears from the context (O'Connor J, Attorney-General (NSW) v. Brewery Employees' Union of New South Wales (1908) 6 CLR 469 at 531).

Paragraph 245-10(b) of the ITAA 1997 provides that the debt forgiveness rules apply to a debt if interest was not payable by you on the debt, but "… had interest or such an amount been payable, the whole or any part of the interest or amount could have been deducted by you;'.

This indicates that the clear intention is that the provisions apply to a commercial debt on which interest is capable of being charged.

An unpaid present entitlement from a trust is not a commercial debt on which interest is capable of being charged.

An unpaid present entitlement is accordingly not a commercial debt that the debt forgiveness provisions apply to.

Division 7A

Taxation Ruling TR 2010/3 Income tax: Division 7A loans: trust entitlements (TR 2010/3) expresses the Commissioner's opinion on circumstances in which a private company with a UPE from an associated trust estate makes a 'loan' to that trust within the meaning of subsection 109D(3), in circumstances where funds representing that UPE remain intermingled with funds of the trust.

Law Administration Practice Statement PS LA 2010/4 Division 7A: trust entitlements (PSLA 2010/4) provides guidance on the administration of TR 2010/3.

The principles in TR 2010/3 and PS LA 2010/4 apply to UPEs owing by a trust to any entity, including an associated private company. Therefore, if a trust appoints income to an associated private company but does not pay the funds to the company, the UPE is capable of amounting to financial accommodation and may be a loan for Division 7A purposes unless the conditions in PS LA 2010/4 are satisfied.

Paragraphs 27 to 30 of TR 2010/3 explain that due to public statements made by the Commissioner prior its issue, these rules do not apply to UPEs that arose before 16 December 2009.

Specifically, paragraph 29 states that the Commissioner's earlier view was that UPEs that came into existence before 16 December 2009 and retained on trust were not 'loans' for the purposes of Division 7A of the ITAA 1936.

In your case, as the UPE came into existence prior to 16 December, 2009, the forgiveness of the UPA will not be deemed a 'loan' for Division 7A purposes and will not affect the assessable income of the trust.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).