Calkin v. Commissioner of Inland Revenue
[1984] 1 NZLR 440Calkin
vCommissioner of Inland Revenue
Judges:
Cooke J.
Richardson J.
Somers J
Subject References:
Income tax
Deductions
Misappropriations by agent
Taxpayer had been the victim of a confidence trick and had suffered a nett loss of $89,500
Taxpayer had believed that his money was being used by a person who was acting as his agent to buy and sell various assets for a profit with the agent taking a 10% commission
Agent turned out to be a confidence trickster and the transactions were fictitious
Whether the taxpayer was engaged in a business
Whether there had been an 'undertaking' carried on for pecuniary profit
Whether taxpayer's net loss was deductible for income tax purposes
Whether s 129CF allowed the deduction of a capital loss
Discussion of the distinction between fact and law in tax cases
Legislative References:
Land and Income Tax Act 1954 - ss 2, 111 and 129CF.
Case References:
Inland Revenue (Commissioner of) v Parson - [1968] NZLR 375.
Lowe v Commissioner of Inland Revenue - [1981] 1 NZLR 326
Judgment date: 10 May 1984
Wellington, New Zealand
Appeal dismissed.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).