CTC RESOURCES NL v FC of T

Members:
Mason CJ

Deane J
Gaudron J

Tribunal:
Full High Court of Australia

Decision date: Judgment delivered 15 April 1994

Mason CJ [Delivering the judgment of the Court after hearing argument]

Appeals in these matters would be from orders made unanimously by a Full Court of the Federal Court. They would involve questions of the construction of complicated provisions of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth). Subject to the qualification mentioned below, they would not give rise to any important matters of general principle in respect of which there is dispute between the parties which is of immediate practical significance in the present case. That is not, of course, to deny that, as Mr Beaumont QC has demonstrated, there are serious practical difficulties in the working of the scheme for private rulings.

The qualification which we have mentioned relates to the construction of the words ``person... dissatisfied'' in s. 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act. The construction of those words requires reference, as a contextual consideration, to the settled principle that, under our Constitution, the jurisdiction to grant declaratory relief which can legitimately be conferred on a federal court must be directed to the determination of legal controversies and not to answering merely abstract or hypothetical questions: see, for example,
Ainsworth & Anor v. Criminal Justice Commission (1991-1992) 175 CLR 564 at 582. In relation to that particular question of construction, however, we consider that the conclusion of the Federal Court to the effect that a person is not relevantly ``dissatisfied'' if the particular decision is merely abstract or hypothetical in character is not attended by sufficient doubt to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal.


ATC 4235

Accordingly, the applications for special leave to appeal are refused.


 

Disclaimer and notice of copyright applicable to materials provided by CCH Australia Limited

CCH Australia Limited ("CCH") believes that all information which it has provided in this site is accurate and reliable, but gives no warranty of accuracy or reliability of such information to the reader or any third party. The information provided by CCH is not legal or professional advice. To the extent permitted by law, no responsibility for damages or loss arising in any way out of or in connection with or incidental to any errors or omissions in any information provided is accepted by CCH or by persons involved in the preparation and provision of the information, whether arising from negligence or otherwise, from the use of or results obtained from information supplied by CCH.

The information provided by CCH includes history notes and other value-added features which are subject to CCH copyright. No CCH material may be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted, or distributed in any way, except that you may download one copy for your personal use only, provided you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices. In particular, the reproduction of any part of the information for sale or incorporation in any product intended for sale is prohibited without CCH's prior consent.