Explanatory Memorandum
(Circulated by authority of the Treasurer, the Hon Peter Costello, MP)Chapter 1 - Quarterly superannuation guarantee
Outline of chapter
1.1 Schedule 1 to this bill will amend the SGAA 1992 to provide for a quarterly SG regime. Specifically, the amendments will:
- •
- allow for the quarterly imposition of the SGC where an employer fails to make quarterly superannuation contributions for its eligible employees;
- •
- require certain employers to report to their employees the amount and destination for superannuation contributions made to reduce their potential SGC liability;
- •
- reduce the penalty aspects of the SGC as a consequence of moving to a quarterly regime;
- •
- adjust the SG salary or wages exclusion threshold, in line with a quarterly regime, from $450 per month to $1,350 per quarter; and
- •
- provide transitional arrangements under which nominal interest and administration components will not apply to shortfalls arising during the first 2 quarters of 2003-2004.
Context of amendments
1.2 The SGCA 1992 currently imposes the SGC on any employer which has an SG shortfall in a year. The SGAA 1992 permits an employer to make superannuation contributions for its eligible employees up to 28 July following the end of the financial year to reduce any SG shortfall. This allows employers to make a single contribution per year, just prior to 28 July, to meet their obligations and avoid the SGC.
1.3 Some 85% of employers already contribute on a quarterly or more frequent basis. However, a move to a compulsory quarterly regime will provide equity amongst all employees by ensuring no employee is disadvantaged by receiving infrequent superannuation contributions.
1.4 Infrequent superannuation contributions give rise to a number of concerns. For example, the compounding nature of superannuation accounts means employees receiving infrequent contributions will have lower benefits as a result of reduced investment earnings on those contributions. Employees death and disability insurance cover can also lapse due to infrequent contributions.
1.5 Employers making infrequent contributions to the detriment of their employees also gain a cash flow advantage over their competitors who do provide regular superannuation contributions.
Summary of new law
1.6 This bill imposes on employers an obligation to make quarterly superannuation contributions or incur the SGC. Employers will be able to make contributions by the 28th day following the end of a quarter to meet their liabilities for that quarter.
1.7 The SGC will be imposed at the end of each quarter in which an employer failed to make appropriate superannuation contributions for its eligible employees.
1.8 Where an employer has not made the required contributions, the employer will be required to complete an SG statement, and pay its SGC liability, by the 14th day of the second month following the end of a quarter.
1.9 In line with the move to a quarterly contribution and assessment regime, the salary or wages threshold below which SG contributions are not required will be changed to an amount of $1,350 per quarter.
1.10 Similarly the nominal interest component of the SGC will be calculated from the beginning of the quarter in which the liability arose up to the day that the employer lodges its SG statement.
1.11 The administration component of the SGC will be amended to reduce the potential impost on employers. The base amount will be reduced to $0 and the per capita amount (which is paid in respect of each employee for whom there is a shortfall) will be reduced to $20.
1.12 Transitional arrangements will also apply to ensure that employers are given the opportunity to adjust to their new responsibilities under the quarterly regime without the application of penalties.
1.13 The transitional arrangements will apply to the first 2 quarters of the 2003-2004 year. The nominal interest and administration components of the SGC will not be applied to shortfalls in respect of either or both of those periods. To be entitled to this reduction on the normal SGC liability, the employer must pay their SGC by 28 April 2004.
1.14 This bill also introduces the concept of employer reporting. Employers will be required to report to their employees on contributions made to reduce an employers charge percentage under section 23 of the SGAA 1992. Penalties will apply to employers who fail to provide this information or who provide false or misleading information.
New law | Current law |
---|---|
Under the new regime, an employers SG shortfall will be determined on a quarterly basis. An employer will be able to make contributions up until the 28th day following the end of a quarter to reduce a shortfall in that quarter. If the employer has a shortfall they will be required to lodge an SG statement by the 14th day of the second month following the end of the quarter. The statement is deemed to be the employers notice of assessment for that quarter. Payment of the SGC will be required when the statement is lodged. | Currently an employers SG shortfall for a year is the sum of its quarterly shortfalls. However, the employer can make contributions up until 28 July following the end of the financial year to reduce a shortfall in any period during the year. If an employer finds a shortfall for a year, it is required to lodge an SG statement by 14 August following the end of the financial year in which the liability arose. The statement lodged by the employer is deemed to be the notice of assessment for the relevant year. Payment of the SGC is required when the statement is lodged. |
The nominal interest component of the SGC will continue to be calculated at a rate of 10% per annum. However the amount of nominal interest will be calculated from the beginning of the quarter in which the liability arose. | Currently, the nominal interest component of the SGC is calculated at a rate of 10% from the beginning of the financial year in which the liability arose. |
The proposed administration component of the SGC will be a flat rate of $0 plus an amount of $20 per employee for whom there has been an SG shortfall. | The administration component of the SGC is currently set at a flat rate of $50 plus $30 per employee for whom there has been an SG shortfall. |
The salary or wages threshold below which SG is not payable will be determined on a quarterly basis (i.e. $1,350 in a quarter). | Currently SG is not payable by an employer if the salary or wages paid to an employee is less than $450 in a month. |
Contributions will only count for the quarter in which they are made or for a subsequent quarter up to 12 months after the contribution is made. | Under current law, a contribution made in a financial year can count for any period in that year or for any period up to 12 months after the contribution was made. |
Under a quarterly regime, contributions will be required by the 28th day following the end of a quarter. If appropriate contributions are not made and an employer has an SG shortfall, then it will be required to complete and lodge an SG statement by the 14th day of the second month following the end of the quarter. | Contributions are currently required to be made by the 28th day following the end of a financial year (i.e. 28 July). If appropriate contributions are not made and an employer has an SG shortfall, then it is required to complete and lodge an SG statement by 14 August following the end of the relevant financial year. |
Employers will be required to report the amount and destination of any contribution to a superannuation fund that reduces their liability to pay the SGC under section 23 of the SGAA 1992. | Under current law, employers are not required to report to their employees about superannuation contributions made on the employees behalf. |
Detailed explanation of new law
1.15 The SGCA 1992 imposes the SGC on any SG shortfall of an employer in a year. The SG shortfall is calculated under section 17 of the SGAA 1992 by adding together the total of the employers individual superannuation guarantee shortfalls for the year, the employers nominal interest component for the year, and the employers administration component for the year.
1.16 Under section 19 of the SGAA 1992, an employers individual superannuation guarantee shortfall in respect of an employee is the sum of the employers quarterly shortfalls in respect of that employee for that year.
1.17 The SGAA 1992 currently divides the year into four 3 month periods. Subsection 23(6A) of the SGAA 1992 allows a contribution made during the relevant financial year, or up until the end of the 28th day following the end of the financial year (i.e. 28 July) to be counted towards any of the periods in that year.
1.18 Failure to make the required level of contributions by 28 July means an employer is liable to lodge an SG statement and pay the SGC.
1.19 Section 33 of the SGAA 1992 requires that the SG statement in respect of a year must be lodged by 14 August of the following year or such later day as allowed by the Commissioner.
1.20 Under section 46 of the SGAA 1992, the SGC is payable by 14 August following the end of the relevant year or if an SG statement is lodged after that date, the day on which the statement is lodged.
1.21 The Superannuation Guarantee Charge Amendment Bill 2002 amends sections 5 and 6 of the SGCA 1992 to impose the SGC on any SG shortfall of an employer for a quarter, and to calculate the charge payable for a quarter by reference to the amount of the shortfall. [Schedule 1, items 1 and 2, sections 5 and 6]
1.22 Sections 5 and 5A of the SGAA 1992 are amended by this bill to ensure that the quarterly regime is appropriately applied to the Commonwealth and to Commonwealth Authorities. [Schedule 1, items 1 to 3, sections 5 and 5A]
1.23 Amendments to section 17 of the SGAA 1992 provide that where an employer has one or more individual superannuation guarantee shortfalls for a quarter, its SG shortfall for that quarter is the total of its individual superannuation guarantee shortfalls for the quarter, its nominal interest component for the quarter, and its administration component for the quarter. [Schedule 1, item 46, section 17]
1.24 Similarly subsections 19(1) and 19(2) of the SGAA 1992, which currently deal with determining an annual amount of individual superannuation guarantee shortfall in respect of an employee, are repealed and replaced with a calculation of the amount of an individual superannuation guarantee shortfall in respect of an employee in a quarter. [Schedule 1, item 48, subsections 19(1) and (2)]
1.25 New subsection 19(2) sets the charge percentage at 9% following the repeal of sections 20 and 21. The charge percentage has not been varied (the maximum rate of 9% currently applies from 1 July 2002). This amendment merely removes redundant historical charge percentage data from the SGAA 1992. [Schedule 1, items 48 and 51, sections 20 and 21, subsection 19(2)]
1.26 The removal of the old charge percentage tables from the SGAA 1992 also necessitates the removal of references to the sections in which those tables appeared. [Schedule 1, items 53, 61, 66, 72, 81 and 102, section 23]
1.27 Subsection 19(4) of the SGAA 1992 is amended by this bill to ensure that employees can still elect that their employer should not be liable for the SGC (in respect of themselves). This section currently refers to concepts that will be repealed with the introduction of a quarterly SG regime. [Schedule 1, item 50, subsection 19(4)]
1.28 Sections 22 and 23 of the SGAA 1992 provide employers with the ability to reduce their charge percentage through making appropriate superannuation contributions. Amendments are made to sections 22 and 23 to ensure that the ability of employers to reduce their charge percentage under those sections is unimpeded by the move to a quarterly contribution regime. To that end, many of the formulae and references in sections 22 and 23 are amended to operate on a quarterly basis. [Schedule 1, items 67, 82 to 85, 90 to 93 and 95 to 99, section 23]
1.29 The current ability of employers to make contributions up until the 28th day following the end of a year and count those contributions towards any period within the year will be removed through the repeal of subsection 23(6A). The subsection will be replaced with a provision allowing employers to make contributions up until the 28th day following the end of a quarter. As a consequence of this change subsection 23(6B), which provides the application provisions for subsection 23(6A), is also repealed. [Schedule 1, items 106 and 107, subsections 23(6A) and (6B)]
1.30 The ability of employers to count contributions against a future SG liability will be retained. New subsection 23(6) will ensure that a contribution can be counted against a future quarter providing that it is not made more than 12 months prior to the beginning of that quarter. [Schedule 1, item 106, subsection 23(6)]
1.31 The ability of defined benefit superannuation funds to seek a benefit certificate at the end of the year to certify that their SG obligations have been met is replaced through amendments to section 10 of the SGAA 1992. The amendments to this section will mean that an employer contributing to a defined benefit scheme will need to hold a benefit certificate prior to the 15th day of the second month following the end of the quarter in order to reduce the charge percentage that applies to the employer. This will ensure that employers contributing to defined benefit schemes are treated in a similar way to employers who are contributing to accumulation schemes. [Schedule 1, item 25, subsections 10(4) and (5)]
1.32 Section 24 of the SGAA 1992 currently operates such that certain benefit certificates are presumed to be in relation to a complying superannuation scheme. This section makes reference to contribution periods in determining whether a benefit certificate is presumed to be in relation to a complying scheme. This bill replaces the definition of starting day in section 24 to, amongst other things, remove references to contribution periods and replace them with references to quarters. [Schedule 1, item 123, subsection 24(5)]
1.33 Section 33 of the SGAA 1992 is amended to require an employer to complete and lodge an SG statement for a quarter in which it has an SG shortfall. The statement will be required by the 14th day of the second month following the end of the relevant quarter (or such later day as the Commissioner allows). Amendments are also made to ensure that the matters reported relate to the quarter in which the employer has had a shortfall. [Schedule 1, items 136, 137, 139 and 140, subsections 33(1), (1A), (2) and (4)]
1.34 The first SG statement for a quarter will be taken to be an assessment of the SGC due for that period, in the same way that the first SG statement for a year is taken to be an assessment under the current system. Amendments to section 75 of the SGAA 1992 will ensure that assessments will be taken to have been made on the 14th day of the second month following the end of the quarter, or the date that the SG statement was lodged, whichever is the later. Section 46 is amended to ensure that employers are required to promptly pay the SGC on any quarterly shortfall. [Schedule 1, items 142 to 147 and 150, sections 35 and 46]
1.35 Amendments to section 49 will ensure that GIC is calculated by reference to only those unpaid amounts for the relevant quarter. [Schedule 1, item 151, section 49]
1.36 Amendments to the Commissioners power to issue default assessments will also be made to ensure that the Commissioner can issue default assessments in respect of a quarter. [Schedule 1, item 148, subsection 36(1)]
1.37 Section 30 of the SGAA 1992 currently causes an employer to be liable to an amount of SGC where that employer has entered into arrangements to try to avoid its SG obligations in respect of a year. This bill amends section 30 so that the employer will be liable to pay an amount of SGC in respect of any quarter in which the employer enters into such an arrangement. [Schedule 1, items 129 and 130, section 30]
1.38 Section 59 of the SGAA 1992 will also be amended to allow the Commissioner to seek information in respect of a quarter when no SG statement has been lodged. [Schedule 1, item 141, section 34]
1.39 Section 23A will be inserted into the SGAA 1992 to require employers to report to their employees the amount and destination of any contribution which reduces an employers SGC under section 23 of that Act. [Schedule 1, item 116, section 23A]
1.40 This new provision only requires employers to report contributions that are made to accumulation schemes. Employers who contribute to defined benefit schemes reduce their SG liability on the basis of a notional contribution rate as determined by an actuary. Whilst the calculation determines whether an employer has notionally met its SG obligations, the entitlements of members of such schemes are actually determined when a member exits the scheme.
1.41 The relevant information must be provided to employees within 30 days of the contribution being made. Failure to provide the information gives rise to a penalty. Providing false or misleading information will be punishable under sections 137.1 and 137.2 of the Criminal Code . [Schedule 1, item 116, subsections 23A(3) and (4)]
1.42 This reporting requirement will support the administration of the SG system by allowing early identification of non-compliance amongst employers whilst simultaneously improving employee ownership of their superannuation accounts.
1.43 Section 18 of the SGAA 1992 is repealed to remove the transitional provisions that applied to the calculation of the individual superannuation guarantee shortfall for the 1992-1993 year, the first year of operation of the SG system. References in other parts of the SGAA 1992 to section 18 are also repealed by this bill. [Schedule 1, items 47, 115, 124, 125, 127 and 128, sections 23 and 28]
1.44 Superannuation contributions for employees are capped under the SGAA 1992 by the maximum contribution base . Employers are only required to make contributions on that amount of the employees earnings base that is equal to or less than the maximum contribution base. The maximum contribution base for the 1992-1993 year is specified in section 15 of the SGAA 1992 and provision is made for the indexation of the figure for subsequent years.
1.45 As a consequence of the introduction of a quarterly SG regime the formula for the indexation of the maximum contribution base requires amendment. This bill amends subsection 9(1) and section 15 of the SGAA 1992 to allow for the continued indexation of this figure, and updates the base amount to the maximum contribution base amount that applies for the 2001-2002 year. [Schedule 1, items 21 and 41 to 44, subsections 9(1) and 15(1) to (4)]
1.46 This bill also removes all references to provisions that are repealed due to the changes to the SGAA 1992 to allow for the operation of a quarterly SG regime (such as subsection 23(6A) that previously allowed employers to make contributions by 28 July and then count them against any period in the preceding year). [Schedule 1, items 59, 65, 70, 76, 94 and 100, subsection 23(6A)]
1.47 This bill also makes various minor amendments to the SGAA 1992 to ensure that all annual obligations under, or actions that could or must have been performed under the Act, must now be met or performed quarterly. [Schedule 1, items 45, 154 to 156 and 158, sections 16 and 59]
1.48 Various amendments are made to the definitions contained in the SGAA 1992 to remove concepts that are obsolete under a quarterly regime. For instance, the notion of a half year does not exist under a quarterly regime. Furthermore, some amendments to definitions were made to ensure they continued to operate appropriately under a quarterly regime. [Schedule 1, items 4 to 14, subsection 6(1)]
1.49 Under the quarterly regime, the notion of contribution periods is replaced with the notion of quarters. This bill therefore removes all references to contribution periods from the SGAA 1992 and, where appropriate, replaces them with references to quarters. [Schedule 1, items 16, 26 to 40, 49, 52, 54 to 58, 62 to 64, 68, 69, 71, 73 to 75, 77 to 80, 86 to 89, 90, 101, 103 to 105, 108 to 110, 114 and 117 to 122, sections 23 and 24]
1.50 A number of changes are made to the SGAA 1992 to lessen the impact of this measure. Section 32 of the SGAA 1992 is amended to reduce the amount of the administration component of the SGC, in line with a quarterly assessment and imposition regime. The amount of the administration component will now be calculated as a base amount of $0 plus $20 per employee for whom there has been a shortfall. [Schedule 1, items 132 to 135, section 32]
1.51 The calculation of the nominal interest component of the SGC is also changed so that nominal interest is only calculated from the beginning of the quarter in which there was an SG shortfall (rather than from the beginning of the financial year). [Schedule 1, item 131, section 31]
1.52 To ameliorate the compliance impact on business, the current monthly salary or wages threshold, below which SG contributions are not required, will be amended to $1,350 per quarter. [Schedule 1, item 126, subsection 27(2)]
1.53 An amendment is made to the heading for Part 7 of the SGAA 1992 so that it more accurately reflects the function of the Part (as a number of the sections of the Part were repealed in 2000). [Schedule 1, item 153]
Application and transitional provisions
1.54 This bill provides for transitional arrangements in moving to a quarterly SG regime. Employers who have an individual superannuation guarantee shortfall in either or both of the first two quarters of 2003-2004 will not be subjected to any nominal interest or administration components of the SGC provided that payment of the SGC is made by 28 April 2004. [Schedule 1, item 194]
1.55 The amendments contained within this bill to effect the move to a quarterly SG regime are to take effect from 1 July 2003. The SGAA 1992 continues to apply in relation to the determination of SG shortfalls and related matters for years that end before 1 July 2003 as if the amendments contained in Schedule 1 to this bill had not been made. [Schedule 1, item 193]
1.56 Provision is made to ensure that conversion notices and benefit certificates that were issued prior to 1 July 2003 remain valid when the transition to the quarterly regime occurs. These rules also allow superannuation funds to seek conversion notices and benefit certificates within the timeframes currently allowed under the annual SG regime in respect of the 2002-2003 year, as a transitional provision. [Schedule 1, items 195 and 196]
1.57 The requirement for employers to report to employees contributions made to reduce an employers charge percentage relates to all contributions after 1 July 2003. [Schedule 1, item 197]
Consequential amendments
1.58 This bill amends the Defence Act 1903 to change references in that Act dealing with superannuation entitlements under the Defence Force Retirement and Death Benefits scheme to reflect the quarterly regime being imposed under the SGAA 1992. [Schedule 1, item 169, subsection 52(3A)]
1.59 Amendments are also made to the Superannuation Act 1976 to ensure that references in that Act that refer to obligations under the SGAA 1992 reflect the move to a quarterly contribution regime. [Schedule 1, items 187 and 188, subsections 110SC(3) and 110SE(6)]
1.60 The ITAA 1936 is amended to ensure that amounts of SGC made or payable in respect of a quarter are treated in the same fashion as amounts of SGC that were made or payable in respect of a year, for the purposes of determining a taxpayers entitlement to claim a deduction for non-employer sponsored superannuation contributions. [Schedule 1, items 171 to 181, section 82AAS]
1.61 Amendments are also made to Schedule 2D of the ITAA 1936 to ensure that entities which were previously non-taxable but become taxable retain the same obligations in respect of the SG under a quarterly system as they did under an annual system. [Schedule 1, items 182 to 184, subsections 57-50(6) and (8) of Schedule 2D]
1.62 The ITAA 1997 is amended to clarify the rules that relate to the maximum deduction that can be claimed under the alienation of personal services income provisions. The amendment clarifies that a deduction is available for contributions made to avoid an individual superannuation guarantee shortfall for an associate in respect of each quarter. Schedule 1, items 185 and 186, subsections 85-25(3) and 86-75(2)]
1.63 The SCT Imposition Act 1997 and the CPF Imposition Act 1997 are both amended by this bill. Both of these Acts have a calculation of a surchargeable contributions threshold that references the notion of an employers charge percentage under the SGAA 1992. Currently, the calculation divides the current charge percentage by the previous charge percentage and then multiplies the result by the indexation factor and the previous threshold .
1.64 As the charge percentage is changing from an annual rate, section 6 in both the SCT Imposition Act 1997 and the CPF Imposition Act 1997 are amended so that the calculation relies on the charge percentage as it applied in the quarter beginning on 1 July in the relevant years. [Schedule 1, items 189 to 192, section 6]
1.65 A transitional provision is also included in this bill to provide the basis for the calculation for the year beginning 1 July 2003 as the previous charge percentage will be an annual figure and the current charge percentage will be a quarterly figure. [Schedule 1, item 202]
Regulation impact statement
1.66 Under the SG legislation employers are required to make specified levels of superannuation contributions to a complying superannuation fund or retirement savings account provider on behalf of their employees to avoid the SGC. The required minimum rate of superannuation contributions is 8% of an employees earnings base in the 2001-2002 year, and will increase to a level of 9% for 2002-2003 and subsequent years.
1.67 If an employer does not make the required level of contributions on behalf of its eligible employees within 28 days of the end of the relevant financial year (i.e. 28 July), they incur the SGC. The SGC is made up of a number of components:
- •
- the superannuation contribution shortfall;
- •
- the nominal interest component of 10% per annum (calculated from 1 July of the previous income year) on the shortfall; and
- •
- the administration component (being a flat $50 plus $30 per employee for whom there has been a shortfall).
1.68 This measure was announced in the Governments election policy statement A Better Superannuation System , released on 5 November 2001. To ensure fairness between employees and to encourage employers to make regular superannuation contributions, it would require all employers to make at least quarterly superannuation contributions on behalf of their employees.
1.69 A number of concerns currently exist in relation to the operation of the SG legislation. These concerns include issues around:
- •
- the risk of employers becoming bankrupt or insolvent without having made superannuation contributions;
- •
- problems with recoveries because liability only arises annually;
- •
- the loss of death and disability insurance from infrequent contributions;
- •
- lower earnings on superannuation accounts for fund members who receive only annual contributions (through lack of compounding); and
- •
- the growth in unclaimed superannuation entitlements.
1.70 The objectives are to make superannuation safer, ensure fairness between employees and encourage employers to make regular contributions by improving the application, efficiency and effectiveness of the SG system, whilst not imposing significant additional costs on employers.
1.71 There were 4 options considered in respect of meeting this objective.
Option (i) - retain existing arrangements
1.72 There would be no change to the existing arrangements for employers to contribute superannuation amounts pursuant to the SG legislation. Currently, an employer has until 28 July to contribute on behalf of its employees in relation to the previous financial year.
Suboption (i)(a) - education campaign
1.73 Continuation of the existing arrangements supplemented by an education campaign to inform employers of their obligations to determine SG shortfalls on a quarterly basis, and the benefits to their employees of more frequent contributions.
Option (ii) - monthly SG contribution
1.74 Employers would be required to remit employees superannuation contributions within 28 days of the end of the previous month to avoid the SGC. An SG statement would be required from all employers liable to the SGC.
Option (iii) - quarterly contribution, quarterly charge
1.75 Employers would be required to make quarterly superannuation contributions. The SGC will apply from the beginning of the relevant quarter only if the employer fails to make the required superannuation contributions by the due date (28 days after the end of the quarter). Defaulting employers would report their liability to the SGC on a quarterly basis on an SG statement.
1.76 This will be supported by a requirement for employers to report to employees the quantum and destination of superannuation contributions. It is also proposed to change the monthly SG exemption threshold from $450 per month to a quarterly figure of $1,350.
Option (iv) - quarterly contribution, annual charge
1.77 Employers would be required to make quarterly superannuation contributions. The SGC would be levied annually, as it is now, if the employer has failed to make the appropriate superannuation contributions for any quarter.
1.78 Defaulting employers would report their liability to the SGC on an annual SG statement. This will be supported by a requirement for employers to report to employees the quantum and destination of superannuation contributions.
1.79 It is also proposed to change the monthly SG exemption threshold from $450 per month to a quarterly figure of $1,350.
1.80 The following key stakeholders will be affected by the proposed changes:
- •
- certain groups of employers, differentiated between small business and business generally - the impact varies depending on the size of the business and whether or not the business is generally complying with the SG legislation;
- •
- employees of affected employers;
- •
- superannuation providers;
- •
- the Government; and
- •
- the ATO.
Option (i) - retain existing arrangements
1.81 This option is to retain the present arrangements.
Employers
1.82 No additional costs will be incurred as the SG reporting requirements will not have changed from the current requirements.
Employees
1.83 The obvious cost to employees is the loss of a legal employment entitlement (i.e. superannuation) if a company goes into liquidation or bankruptcy. This is particularly relevant for part-time and casual employees who frequently do not accrue much in the way of superannuation benefits. This would lead to a reduction in the retirement benefit the employee would be able to accumulate to provide an adequate standard of living in retirement.
1.84 For some employees, the absence of regular contributions means they receive lower returns on those contributions due to reduced compounding of earnings.
1.85 A further cost to employees is the loss of death and disability cover linked to their superannuation entitlement, which is likely to lapse if regular contributions are not made to the fund. This is a significant risk, as has been highlighted by a few instances where the member has died and not been covered due to annual contributions.
Superannuation providers
1.86 If current SG arrangements were retained, superannuation providers would continue to be subject to administration costs associated with lost members and corrupt superannuation deposit details. These situations would be reduced if superannuation contributions were due on a more regular basis. This is because employee details provided by an employer to the fund would be more current. Essentially, this gives superannuation providers a greater opportunity to match individuals with their superannuation entitlements or obtain valid employee details from the employer.
1.87 In situations where the trust deed or some other obligation requires more frequent contributions the trustee will still be subject to the costs of attempting to obtain contributions as they are due.
Government
1.88 There may be a cost to government in dispelling a perception in the community that compulsory superannuation is not as important as other employee entitlements or business tax obligations.
1.89 This is particularly relevant where employees lose their superannuation entitlements due to business failures. If a business goes into liquidation at the start of the financial year it is approximately 12 months before the SGC is crystallised and recoverable. However, other employee entitlements, such as unpaid wages and annual leave, may be paid out as part of the liquidation or through the Employee Entitlement Support Scheme.
ATO
1.90 Retention of the existing arrangements would mean no decrease in reporting of lost members from funds to the Lost Member Register. It would also result in the continued use of the SHAR for small amounts of superannuation that have incomplete or corrupt deposit details. This will impact on the ATO by requiring the reallocation of resources to administer these programs that could be more appropriately used in strategic or compliance operations.
1.91 The Commissioner will also continue to be restricted in his ability to recover SG shortfalls on behalf of employees. This is because an SG debt does not crystallise until 14 August of the following financial year, and on occasions the debts from a company in liquidation may have been finalised before the SGC is raised.
Employers
1.92 Employers would not be required to retrain staff or implement new procedures and systems if the SG contribution frequency remains the same. The cash flow of the business would not be impacted.
Employees
1.93 Not applicable.
Superannuation providers
1.94 There would be no benefits for superannuation providers from retaining the existing arrangements.
Government
1.95 The existing level of support and general acceptance of SG is likely to be maintained without the need for the Government to incur additional costs.
ATO
1.96 There would be no change to the ATOs current work allocation.
Suboption (i)(a) - education campaign
1.97 This option retains the existing arrangements, but supplements them through an education campaign informing employers of their obligations and of the benefits to their employees of more frequent contributions.
Employers
1.98 Some businesses not currently making regular contributions, or even meeting their obligations, will incur costs if they change administrative and system procedures to provide for more frequent payment of employees superannuation entitlements.
Employees
1.99 In situations where an employer does not change its behaviour, as there is no legal obligation for them to do so, the costs to employees remains the same as in option 1.
Superannuation providers
1.100 There may be a slight increase in enquiries to superannuation providers from employers and employees as the result of an education campaign.
Government
1.101 To be effective a broad education campaign informing employers of their obligations under the SG legislation is estimated to cost approximately $22.9 million in the start-up year, and $2.1 million in recurrent costs.
1.102 A substantial campaign would be required, as there is the need to change employer behaviour to do something, which has no immediate benefit to their bottom line. Recurrent spending is required to track the effectiveness of the campaign and to provide reminders to small business.
ATO
1.103 An education campaign would be likely to increase the workload within the ATO from enquiries and complaints. This cost is included as part of the cost to Government for the education campaign.
Employers
1.104 An education campaign should improve employers understanding of their superannuation obligations, and of the benefits for employees in relation to more frequent superannuation contributions. This should reduce the incidence of employers becoming subject to the SGC.
Employees
1.105 An education campaign may produce increased SG compliance by employers, thereby leading to greater benefits for employees, as well as facilitating employees understanding of their superannuation entitlements under the law.
Superannuation providers
1.106 Superannuation providers would benefit from any improvement in employers meeting their SG obligations, as they would have fewer amounts to recover from employers or the ATO.
1.107 However, there would not necessarily be a benefit for those funds which have entered into a contract to receive contributions more frequently than annually. Many superannuation funds in this situation tend to undertake their own compliance activity to ensure that the contracts that employers have entered into with them are fulfilled.
Government
1.108 An education campaign may prompt some employers to analyse their present compliance levels and take action to rectify any problems. The Government would benefit from an increased level of compliance as people would accumulate more benefits for their retirement and lesser amounts may be lost from the superannuation system due to business failure.
ATO
1.109 To the extent that there is increased employer compliance with SG obligations, there will be a lessening in administrative workload for the ATO, though this lessening will not offset the increased workloads created by greater community awareness of SG obligations.
Option (ii) - monthly superannuation contribution
1.110 This option involves amending the SG legislation to provide that all employers make superannuation contributions 28 days after the end of each month or pay the SGC to the ATO at that time.
Employers
1.111 Smaller businesses will generally be more affected by this measure and may incur significant additional administrative costs in making monthly SG contributions. There may also be impacts on the cash flow of some businesses irrespective of size.
1.112 Employers in rural and regional areas could experience difficulties in complying as access to technology and other services may currently be limited. For small businesses, the SG requirements may require more frequent reporting than their other tax obligations.
1.113 Employers which determine their level of contributions on a set and forget basis may be subject to multiple SGC if their liability has increased over time. Therefore, businesses would be required to examine the SG obligations on a more regular basis, increasing their administration costs.
Employees
1.114 Not applicable.
Superannuation providers
1.115 There may be an increase in enquiries and transactions, as businesses paying less frequently than monthly increase their contributions.
Government
1.116 There would be costs of approximately $17.5 million in the start-up phase (to enhance information technology capability), and $10.5 million ongoing, to fund the administration of the arrangements (e.g. interpretive and other help services and compliance activities) and an employer education campaign.
ATO
1.117 This would incur additional costs for the ATO (included in the figures in paragraphs 1.95) to rebuild the computer system (so that it was capable of handling the monthly imposition and calculation of the SGC) and implement an extensive education campaign. It would be difficult for the ATO to effectively monitor and ensure compliance to the level of community expectations without a substantial increase in resources. Without increased compliance activity, negative comments on monthly compliance with SG may undermine confidence and encourage further non-compliance from employers.
Employers
1.118 This may bring SG requirements into line with the timeframe for payment of other employee remuneration and PAYG related obligations for larger employers thus simplifying administration.
Employees
1.119 This would achieve the objective of protecting employee entitlements in the event of bankruptcy or insolvency of the employer. The benefits of regular contributions such as insurance cover and increased earnings will be obtained. Generally, this will lead to an increase in retirement savings.
Superannuation providers
1.120 Superannuation providers will benefit by receiving data in a more timely manner increasing the likelihood that the information is correct or missing details can be obtained. The superannuation providers will also have funds to invest on behalf of their members at an earlier time.
1.121 This would also support trustees in obtaining payments within the timeframes as specified in their trust deeds.
Government
1.122 This would have a positive impact on the level of compulsory superannuation savings and as a consequence the potential retirement income of individuals, thereby potentially reducing the government outlays on age pensions.
1.123 This would be viewed as a popular measure by employees and may improve the level of confidence people have in the SG system and superannuation saving generally.
ATO
1.124 Not applicable.
Option (iii) - quarterly contributions, quarterly charge
1.125 This proposal involves amending the SG legislation to move from an annual contribution regime to a quarterly regime, with quarterly determination of SG shortfall and a quarterly SGC for non-compliant employers. It should be noted the legislation currently requires employers to ascertain their individual shortfalls in relation to an employee on a per quarter basis, but to contribute annually, or pay an annual SGC where a shortfall exists for the year. The quarterly contribution regime will be supported by a reporting requirement whereby employers are required to report to employees the quantum and destination of superannuation contributions.
Employers
1.126 The proposal will impact on various employers in different ways depending on the regularity of contributions they make at the moment and whether the employer will be subject to the SGC.
1.127 The ATO understands that approximately 85% of all businesses pay superannuation on behalf of their employees on a quarterly or more regular basis. The ATO also understands that approximately 83% of small businesses are currently making superannuation contributions on a quarterly or more regular basis. On the basis of these figures 15% of all businesses would be required to change their current payment frequency. Further, this option would impact on approximately 17% of small businesses.
1.128 Businesses not contributing on at least a quarterly basis may incur additional administrative and cash flow costs. It is believed that of those businesses likely to be affected by the introduction of a quarterly SG regime, most will be smaller businesses (i.e. less than 10 employees).
1.129 The effect on administrative costs is unclear as the widespread use of software payroll packages, already adopted by small businesses to deal with quarterly reporting and payment requirements under the new tax system, should minimise the impact.
1.130 The impacts on cash flow may be an issue for businesses currently contributing superannuation on behalf of their employees on an annual basis. Businesses in these circumstances may have to utilise through year cash flows to meet more frequent superannuation payments under a quarterly regime. However, it is possible that requiring more frequent superannuation contributions might better align payments with business income, particularly for seasonal businesses.
1.131 Some employers may incur some minimal costs in relation to the requirement to report contributions to employees. It is believed that most employers could meet these obligations through minimal changes to information provided on payslips and hence will not incur significant costs in meeting this requirement.
Employees
1.132 Some employees will be disadvantaged by the change in the exemption threshold from $450 per month to $1,350 per quarter. This will particularly be the case with low-income casual workers.
Superannuation providers
1.133 There may be an increase in enquiries and transactions, as businesses paying less frequently than monthly increase their contributions.
Government
1.134 There would need to be an education campaign aimed at employers to inform them of the new quarterly arrangements. Such a campaign may produce a spin-off in increased compliance by employers with SG. An education campaign, even one confined to a move to a quarterly regime, may prompt some employers to analyse their present compliance levels and take action to rectify any problems.
1.135 The costs to Government of implementing this option are estimated at $17.5 million in the start-up phase, with recurrent costs of approximately $10.5 million a year. These figures include the costs of a targeted education campaign estimated to cost $4.1 million initially. There would also be recurrent costs estimated at $10.5 million to maintain education and help services and conduct compliance activities for a quarterly SG contribution regime.
1.136 Interpretative and other help services costs would increase if exemptions to a quarterly regime were allowed to certain employers. Currently, there are no exemptions being entertained but some employer groups have previously indicated that, if a quarterly SG system is implemented, their particular industry should be exempted.
ATO
1.137 A move to a quarterly regime will increase ATO costs involved in administering the SG arrangements. Extra resources to deal more regularly with non-compliers, payment of the SGC and its disbursement to employees may be necessary. Interpretative and other help services costs would increase, particularly if exemptions to a quarterly regime where allowed to certain employers. There would need to be changes made to the ATO computer system handling SG. These costs have been included in the costs to Government.
Employers
1.138 Businesses that have an SG shortfall in one quarter will in many circumstances have a smaller shortfall amount to pay than under an annual system. Further, interest will only apply from the beginning of the quarter for that quarter, rather than the beginning of the year for the whole year, thus resulting in an interest saving.
1.139 A quarterly contribution and assessment regime will alert some businesses to problems in the level of their contributions at an earlier stage and enable them to take action to rectify the problem more quickly, reducing the amount of SGC payable over the year, and ensuring future compliance.
1.140 It could also be argued that making more frequent contributions is a prudent business practice for the small business sector of the community and avoids large end of year outlays.
1.141 Some businesses will gain from the introduction of a quarterly SG exemption threshold as some employees who had been previously entitled to SG contributions will no longer be entitled.
Employees
1.142 A quarterly contribution scheme will limit the amount of superannuation contributions at risk if an employer becomes insolvent or bankrupt. At the moment, because the SGC only becomes a debt to the Commonwealth on 14 August of the year after the financial year in question, employers who have gone into liquidation before that date do not have a provable SG debt prior to that date. There is thus no requirement to pay the amount. Therefore, employees can lose the whole annual contribution that should have been made on their behalf (or the equivalent SGC) if those contributions were not made. An effective quarterly regime will only place at risk that quarters contributions or SGC, rather than a full years contributions or SGC as at present.
1.143 Further, more regular payment may improve the coverage of death and disability insurance offered by superannuation providers to fund members. New employees would generally not receive coverage until contributions are made on their behalf. If contributions are only made annually these employees are arguably at risk for up to 12 months. For existing employees there is a risk that cover will lapse between contributions.
1.144 Reporting of contributions will increase employee interest in and knowledge of their superannuation entitlements.
Superannuation providers
1.145 Superannuation providers will benefit by receiving data in a more timely manner, increasing the likelihood that the information is correct or any missing details can still be obtained. This could stem the growth in lost and unclaimed superannuation accounts. Superannuation providers will also have the benefit of receiving funds at an earlier time to invest. This should also reduce complaints and disputes with regard to lapses in death and disability insurance coverage.
Government
1.146 A move to a quarterly regime is likely to enhance compliance rates among employers with SG obligations, presuming an education campaign is undertaken.
1.147 There is an expected increase in revenue, through the bring forward of the SGC of an estimated $35 million in the 2003-2004 year under this option.
1.148 The proposal may reduce future Government pension outlays through an increase in the size of the end benefits of affected employees. It is not possible to quantify the effect, although it is likely to be minimal. The minimal nature of any increase is because the end benefits of employees will only increase by the amount of interest accrued on contributions made during (rather than at the end of) a year.
1.149 Increased self-regulation by employers is likely as employees become more interested and knowledgable about their superannuation with ongoing employer reporting.
ATO
1.150 A quarterly regime would allow for the most effective monitoring of trends and compliance by the ATO. The ATO would also be in a position to respond more promptly to recover employee entitlements in the event of insolvency or bankruptcy.
1.151 Increased employee awareness (through the reporting requirements) would also lead to earlier notification of non-compliance and increased self-regulation amongst employers.
Option (iv) - quarterly contributions, annual charge
1.152 This proposal involves amending the SG legislation to move from an annual contribution scheme to a quarterly one, but with a quarterly determination of SG shortfall and an annual imposition of the SGC. It should be noted the legislation currently requires employers to ascertain their individual shortfalls in relation to an employee on a per quarter basis, but to make only annual payments or incur an annual SGC. The quarterly contribution regime will be supported by a reporting requirement whereby employers are required to report to employees the quantum and destination of superannuation contributions.
Employers
1.153 The proposal will impact on various employers in different ways depending on the regularity of contributions they make at the moment and whether the employer will be subject to the SGC.
1.154 Businesses that do not contribute on at least a quarterly basis may incur additional costs.
1.155 There is additional cost to employers when compared to the status quo as employers will no longer be able to make a reconciliation payment by 28 July following the end of the financial year if they have had a shortfall in any of the first 3 quarters. Currently employers can make a payment by 28 July so if an end of year reconciliation uncovers a shortfall there is an opportunity to fix the error. Under this option, once 28 days after the end of a quarter have passed, there is no opportunity to make further contributions and the employer will have to pay the SGC.
1.156 As failure to make payment by the relevant date following the end of the quarter will not be able to be rectified, employers will not be encouraged to reconcile their SG contributions before the end of the financial year.
1.157 There is also a potential cost to employers if this option were implemented in that employers may overlook the requirement to make quarterly contributions if the SGC is not raised on a quarterly basis thus facing significantly greater expense when paying the SGC following the end of the relevant financial year.
1.158 Some employers may incur some minimal costs in relation to the requirement to report contributions to employees. It is believed that most employers could meet these obligations through minimal changes to information provided on payslips and hence will not incur significant costs in meeting this requirement.
Employees
1.159 This option will not address the issue of employers who become insolvent during the year, as the SGC will still only crystallise on 14 August following the end of the year. This option could therefore potentially cost employees their entitlements as the ATO will still be unable to seek the SGC prior to 14 August following the end of the relevant year. It does not meet the Governments election policy goal of making super safer.
1.160 Some employees will be disadvantaged by the change in the exemption threshold from $450 per month to $1,350 per quarter. This will particularly be the case with low-income casual workers.
Government
1.161 There would need to be an education campaign aimed at employers to inform them of the new quarterly regime. Such a campaign may produce a spin-off in increased compliance by employers with SG obligations. An education campaign, even one confined to a move to a quarterly regime, may prompt some employers to analyse their present compliance levels and take action to rectify any problems.
ATO
1.162 The ATO will incur some additional administration costs around the end of each quarter in responding to enquiries about SG obligations.
Employers
1.163 Businesses that have identified a shortfall in one quarter should, in many circumstances, have a smaller shortfall amount to pay than under an annual system. Further, interest will only apply for a quarters shortfall from the beginning of the relevant quarter to 14 August following the end of the financial year. This is a reduction compared to a situation whereby interest is calculated for all shortfall amounts from 1 July in the relevant year through to 14 August in the following financial year. Thus there will be a small interest savings.
1.164 Employers who have failed to meet their full obligations will also benefit under this regime (compared to a quarterly contributions, quarterly charge regime) by being able to defer payment of under-contributed SG until 14 August following the end of the relevant financial year.
1.165 It could also be argued that making more frequent contributions is a prudent business practice for the small business sector of the community and would avoid large end of year outlays.
1.166 Some businesses will gain from the introduction of a quarterly SG exemption threshold as some employees who had been previously entitled to SG contributions will no longer be entitled.
Employees
1.167 Where more regular payment occurs, this may improve the coverage of death and disability insurance offered by superannuation providers to fund members. New employees would generally not receive coverage until contributions are made on their behalf. If contributions are only made annually these employees are arguably at risk for up to 12 months. For existing employees there is a risk that cover will lapse between contributions.
1.168 Reporting of contributions will increase employee interest in and knowledge of their superannuation entitlements.
Superannuation providers
1.169 Superannuation providers will benefit by receiving data in a more timely manner, meaning that it will be more likely that the information is correct or any missing details can still be obtained. This could stem the growth in lost and unclaimed superannuation accounts. Superannuation providers will also have the benefit of receiving funds at an earlier time to invest. This should also reduce complaints and disputes with regard to lapses in death and disability insurance coverage.
Government
1.170 A move to a quarterly scheme is likely to enhance compliance rates among employers with SG obligations, presuming an education campaign is undertaken. The costs of an education campaign, mainly targeted at employers who are currently not remitting SG contributions on a quarterly or better basis, is estimated to cost $4.1 million initially. There would also be recurrent costs estimated at $10.5 million to maintain education, help services and compliance activities for a quarterly SG contribution regime (these figures are included in the figures outlined in paragraph 1.135.)
1.171 The proposal may reduce future Government pension outlays through an increase in the size of the end benefits of affected employees. It is not possible to quantify the effect, although it is likely to be minimal.
1.172 Increased self-regulation by employers is likely as employees become more interested and knowledgable about their superannuation with ongoing employer reporting. This may also result in reductions in future Government outlay on pensions.
ATO
1.173 There are no benefits for the ATO in the implementation of this option.
1.174 Other Government agencies and a number of representative industry organisations were consulted on the majority of the aspects of this proposal. The proposed requirement for the reporting of contributions was not part of the proposal that was originally the focus of consultation.
1.175 The introduction of a quarterly SG regime would be the most acceptable change, for more frequent contributions, to the business community and would be accepted as a positive move to protect employee entitlements. There would also be support from the superannuation industry.
1.176 There has been a call from industry and relevant stakeholders that quarterly superannuation contributions should be implemented. For example, The ICAA has called for the implementation of a more frequent SG contribution regime. The ICAA believes that a more frequent SG contribution regime provides for a more secure method for employees to receive the SG entitlements.
1.177 At the Senate Select Committee on Superannuation and Financial Services hearings, industry groups such as the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia and the Financial Services Consumer Policy Centre, supported a more frequent superannuation contribution regime. However, they believed that a monthly, not a quarterly superannuation contribution regime, should be implemented initially.
1.178 CPA Australia was also supportive of a more frequent superannuation contribution regime. It believed quarterly superannuation will not impose further costs on small business. However, CPA Australia also stated that going to a monthly superannuation contribution regime would be fiercely opposed by small business.
1.179 The COSBOA in its submission to the Senate Select Committee asked that there be no recommendation from the inquiry that adds to the compliance and administration costs of small business. COSBOA has concerns with employers being required to make superannuation contributions, on behalf of their employees, on a monthly basis (e.g. under awards).
1.180 The National Farmers Federation was originally supportive of this proposal but has since indicated it is reconsidering its position following a survey of the rural industrys fund, Australian Primary, which indicated that a larger than expected percentage of contributors to that fund only contributed on an annual basis.
1.181 The Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry in its publication The Policies of the ACCI 2000 , stated that moving to a more frequent SG contribution regime, such as quarterly, may provide greater security for employees entitlements, as well as reducing some of the administration costs on employers.
1.182 Consultations with other business organisations have indicated general support for the concept of a quarterly SG payment and compliance regime, particularly in aligning the measure to other tax obligations. It was also seen as good business practice to make frequent superannuation contributions. Concern was expressed, however, that there should be no additional compliance burden on the majority of businesses which are complying or substantially complying with their SG obligations.
1.183 Of the above options, it is option (iii) that satisfies the objectives by providing a strengthening of employees superannuation entitlements, whilst not placing an onerous compliance burden on business.
1.184 Option (i) does not achieve the objective of providing protection of employees superannuation entitlements.
1.185 Option (i)(a) may assist in reducing non-compliance in some circumstances, however, it does not sufficiently protect employees superannuation entitlements when businesses become bankrupt or insolvent.
1.186 Option (ii) would impose an additional burden on small businesses through the imposition of onerous monthly reporting requirements. As a consequence, this will lead to a more complex and costly system for small business due to increased compliance obligations.
1.187 Option (iii) means an employee is less likely to lose all or some of their superannuation entitlements when a business becomes bankrupt or insolvent, as businesses will be required to contribute on a more frequent basis, but not excessively so. This option also provides the most efficient and effective outcome for the ATO in relation to the administration and application of the SG system.
1.188 Option (iv), whilst being superficially similar to option (iii) is hampered by an annual imposition of the SGC. The annual imposition of the SGC doesnt address many of the issues that have prompted consideration of there proposals. Fully non-compliant employers could still not be pursued until 14 August, leaving at risk an entire years SG contributions. Similarly death and disability insurance can lapse and the superannuation funds do not have use of the contributions. It is unlikely that this option could be a viable alternative without the introduction of additional penalties which would undoubtedly add considerable complexity to the legislation.
1.189 Even though a significant proportion of businesses are already paying superannuation on a quarterly or better basis, implementation of quarterly superannuation contributions should only occur after an appropriate lead in time. During this time an education campaign informing employers of their obligations and employees of their superannuation entitlements would be conducted.
1.190 The Government has announced that the quarterly superannuation contributions measure will commence from 1 July 2003. This will allow businesses, particularly small businesses, the necessary time to implement administration procedures and system upgrades to deal with a quarterly superannuation contribution regime.
1.191 Transitional arrangements will also allow for a period of education and adjustment in the first 2 quarters following the commencement of a quarterly SG regime. This will assist business in meeting its obligations whilst encouraging compliance with the new regime.
1.192 The transitional arrangements will only require an employer to pay the amount of unpaid superannuation to the ATO, without the imposition of the nominal interest or administration components that generally make up part of the SGC. Depending on the size of the shortfall and the number of employees involved this could result in significant savings for employers during the transitional period.
1.193 A substantial review of the effect of any change adopted - including the costs on business - would be conducted by the ATO 3 years after its introduction. It should be noted that the ATO is currently developing mechanisms to identify levels of current non-compliance with SG obligations. Adoption of any one of the options and its effect on business would be monitored in that context as well.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).