Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Choice of Superannuation Funds) Act 2004 (102 of 2004)

Schedule 1   Choice of superannuation funds

Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992

15A   After subsection 19(2)

Insert:

(2A) If an employer makes one or more contributions (the no choice contributions ) to an RSA or a complying superannuation fund other than a defined benefit superannuation scheme, for the benefit of an employee during a quarter and the contributions are not made in compliance with the choice of fund requirements, the employer's individual superannuation guarantee shortfall for the employee for the quarter is increased by the amount worked out in accordance with the formula:

25% * [Notional quarterly shortfall - Amount worked out under subsection (1)]

where:

notional quarterly shortfall is the amount that would have been worked out under subsection (1) if the no choice contributions had not been made.

Note 1: See also subsection (2E) and section 19A.

Note 2: Part 3A sets out the choice of fund requirements.

(2B) If:

(a) a reduction of the charge percentage for an employee for a quarter is made under subsection 22(2) in respect of a defined benefit superannuation scheme; and

(b) there is at least one relevant day in the quarter where, if contributions (the notional contributions ) had been made to the scheme by the employer for the benefit of the employee on the day, the notional contributions would have been made not in compliance with the choice of fund requirements; and

(c) section 20 (which deals with certain cases where no contributions are required) does not apply to the employer in respect of the employee in respect of the scheme for the quarter;

the employer's individual superannuation guarantee shortfall for the employee for the quarter is increased by the amount worked out in accordance with the formula:

25% * [Notional quarterly shortfall - Amount worked out under subsection(1)] * (Number of breach of condition days / Relevant days in quarter)

where:

notional quarterly shortfall is the amount that would have been worked out under subsection (1) if no reduction were made under subsection 22(2) in respect of the scheme.

number of breach of condition days is the number of relevant days in the quarter on which, if a contribution had been made to the scheme by the employer for the benefit of the employee, those contributions would have been made not in compliance with the choice of fund requirements.

Note 1: See also subsection (2E) and section 19A.

Note 2: Part 3A sets out the choice of fund requirements.

(2C) The following days in a quarter are relevant days for the purposes of subsection (2B):

(a) if the value of B in the formula in subsection 22(2) for the quarter is 1 - every day in the quarter; or

(b) in any other case - every day in the quarter that is in the shorter of the scheme membership period or the certificate period referred to in subsection 22(2).

(2D) A reference in subsections (2A) and (2B) to an employer's individual superannuation guarantee shortfall being increased includes a reference to the shortfall being increased from nil.

(2E) The Commissioner may reduce (including to nil) the amount of an increase in an employer's individual superannuation guarantee shortfall for an employee for a quarter under subsection (2A) or (2B).

Note: The Commissioner must have regard to written guidelines when deciding whether or not to make a decision under this subsection: see section 21.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).