Superannuation Guarantee Determination
SGD 93/6W
Superannuation guarantee: is a driver who provides courier services an employee of the courier company for the purposes of the Superannuation Guarantee?
-
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this withdrawal notice.This document has changed over time. View its history.
FOI status:
may be releasedNOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL
Superannuation Guarantee Determination SGD 93/6 is withdrawn with effect from today.
This Determination provided a number of indicia for determining whether a driver who provides courier services is an employee of the courier company for purposes of the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (SGAA). It concludes that couriers are generally common law employees, or are deemed employees, because they are contracted wholly or principally for their labour, even if they provide their own vehicle. This conflicts with the decision of the NSW Supreme Court of Appeal in Vabu Pty Ltd v FC of T (1996) 96 ATC 4898; (1996) 33 ATR 537, where the court found that couriers engaged by Vabu were not employees for the purposes of the SGAA. A determinative factor for the court was the considerable expense borne by couriers in the supply and maintenance of their own vehicles as well as the fact that they were paid per result. It is considered that the majority of couriers are engaged under a similar basis as was the case in Vabu.
Commissioner of Taxation
21 July 1999
References
ATO references:
NO NAT 99/4295-5; 92/7707-2
Date: | Version: | Change: | |
29 April 1993 | Original ruling | ||
You are here | 21 July 1999 | Withdrawn |
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).