Taxation Determination
TD 2008/22ER - Erratum
Income tax: capital gains: does CGT event C2 happen as a result of the satisfaction of an investor's rights under a Deferred Purchase Agreement warrant, an investment product offered by financial institutions, by the delivery of the Delivery Assets?
-
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.View the consolidated version for this notice.
Erratum
This Erratum corrects Taxation Determination TD 2008/22 to amend the case citation of Lend Lease Custodian Pty Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2006] FCA 1790; 2007 ATC 4041; 65 ATR 455.
TD 2008/22 is corrected as follows:
Omit the text; substitute:
It is noted that the decision of the Federal Court in Lend Lease Custodian Pty Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2006] FCA 1790; 2007 ATC 4041; 65 ATR 455 has no application to DPA warrants. That case involved the ascertainment of the seller's capital proceeds from a contract for the sale of a determinate number of identifiable assets. By contrast, a DPA warrant involves the acquisition of assets, the number of which is indeterminate as at the time the DPA warrant contract is entered into.
Omit:
- -
- Lend Lease Custodian Pty Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation 90 ATC 4401 (1990) 21 ATR 402
Substitute:
- -
- Lend Lease Custodian Pty Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2006] FCA 1790; 2007 ATC 4041; 65 ATR 455
This Erratum applies on and from 30 July 2008.
Commissioner of Taxation
17 September 2008
References
ATO references:
NO 2006/20258
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).