Taxation Determination

TD 92/106

Income tax: who should be assessed to interest earned on a joint bank account?

This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version.

  • Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.
    This document has changed over time. View its history.

FOI status:

may be releasedFOI number: I 1212696

This Determination, to the extent that it is capable of being a 'public ruling' in terms of Part IVAAA of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 , is a public ruling for the purposes of that Part . Taxation Ruling TR 92/1 explains when a Determination is a public ruling and how it is binding on the Commissioner. Unless otherwise stated, the Determination applies to transactions entered into both before and after its date of issue.

1. Interest income on a joint bank account should be assessed to income tax to the persons who are beneficially entitled to the income (see MacFarlane v. FC of T 86 ATC 4477 at 4486-7; (1986) 17 ATR 808 at 819-20). That entitlement depends on the beneficial ownership of the moneys in the account. The general presumption is that holders of acounts in joint names have joint beneficial ownership of the moneys in equal shares. This presumption is rebuttable by evidence to the contrary (see Case Z7 92 ATC 131; AAT Case 7675 (1991) 22 ATR 3591).

2. In a self assessment environment, interest income on a joint bank account should be returned by taxpayers according to who has the beneficial entitlement to the interest.

3. In an audit context, if there is no evidence as to the beneficial entitlement to the interest, it is appropriate to assess the interest derived on a joint bank account to the account holders in equal shares. However, if a taxpayer disputes that assessing treatment and has evidence to support his or her claims as to a different entitlement to the interest, those claims should be accepted unless there is evidence to refute the claims.

4. The sort of relevant evidence includes information as to who contributed to the account, in what proportions the contributions were made, the nature of the contributions, who drew on the account and who used the money and the accrued interest as their own property. Evidence also might be provided that joint account holders hold moneys in the account on trust for other persons, e.g. dependants.

Example :

B and C are each assessed to tax on half of the interest not returned on their joint bank account. B later establishes that C contributed all of the money to the account and usually treated all of the interest as her money. B has only once drawn funds from the account. C should be assessed to all of the interest.

Commissioner of Taxation
1/7/92

References

ATO references:
NO 92/3449-7

ISSN 1038 - 3158

Related Rulings/Determinations:

IT 2486

Subject References:
derivation of interest from joint bank account

Legislative References:
ITAA 25(1)

Case References:
MacFarlane v. FC of T
86 ATC 4477
(1986) 17 ATR 808


Case Z7
92 ATC 131

AAT Case 7675
(1991) 22 ATR 3591

TD 92/106 history
  Date: Version: Change:
You are here 1 July 1992 Original ruling  
  26 April 2017 Withdrawn  

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).