Taxation Determination

TD 93/136

Income tax: Offshore Banking Units - if a loan entered into by a foreign branch of an Australian resident bank is assigned to the Australian OBU head office, does this constitute an OB activity?

This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version.

Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.

This document has changed over time. View its history.

FOI status:

may be releasedFOI number: I 1215571

This Determination, to the extent that it is capable of being a 'public ruling' in terms of Part IVAAA of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 , is a public ruling for the purposes of that Part. Taxation Ruling TR 92/1 explains when a Determination is a public ruling and how it is binding on the Commissioner. Unless otherwise stated, this Determination applies to years commencing both before and after its date of issue. However, this Determination does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Determination (see paragraphs 21 and 22 of Taxation Ruling TR 92/20).

1. Yes, provided the loan contract is traded in accordance with subsection 121D(4) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA) and not merely transferred, or is a lending activity within the meaning given in subsection 121D(2).

2. Subsection 121D(4) defines trading activity to include, amongst other things, trading with offshore persons in securities issued by non-residents and trading with offshore persons in non-resident company shares which are not denominated in Australian currency. The Explanatory Memorandum states that an OBU may trade on its own behalf.

3. Section 121EB of the ITAA treats the overseas permanent establishment as a separate person from the Australian part of the bank conducting offshore banking. Therefore, a loan contract may be traded in accordance with subsection 121D(4) provided any amounts payable under the loan contract are payable by non-residents and are not payable in Australian currency.

4. Accordingly, all or part of a portfolio of offshore loans can be transferred provided the transfer takes the form of a sale. The sale could entail an assignment or novation of the loan for tax purposes.

5. The definition of 'lend' in section 121C includes providing finance by the purchase of a security. It does not matter if it is on the secondary market. However, the person from whom the security was originally issued must have been an offshore person. If that person is a branch of an Australian company, the security must not be in Australian dollars. Therefore, where these criteria are met, the assignment of the loan will be an OB activity.

Example

An Australian OBU buys a portfolio of loans from its Singapore branch which is an ACU (an Asian Currency Unit which is essentially a Singaporean OBU). The sale entails an assignment for tax purposes of non-resident parties to the loan contracts and any amounts payable are not denominated in Australian dollars. The transaction would be an OB activity in terms of section 121D.

Commissioner of Taxation
8/7/93

Previously issued as Draft TD93/D36

References

ATO references:
NO NO 92/9494-5

ISSN 1038 - 8982

Legislative References:
ITAA 121D(4)

TD 93/136 history

	Date:	Version:	Change:
You are here	8 July 1993	Original ruling
	13 October 2021	Consolidated ruling	Addendum

Copyright notice

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).