Taxation Determination

TD 94/25

Fringe benefits tax: where an employer provides entertainment to both employees and non-employees, what is an acceptable method of determining the portion applicable to the employees for the purposes of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 ?

This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version.

Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.

This document has changed over time. View its history.

FOI status:

may be releasedFOI number: I 1217171

This Determination, to the extent that it is capable of being a 'public ruling' in terms of Part IVAAA of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 , is a public ruling for the purposes of that Part. Taxation Ruling TR 92/1 explains when a Determination is a public ruling and how it is binding on the Commissioner. Unless otherwise stated, this Determination applies to years commencing both before and after its date of issue. However, this Determination does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Determination (see paragraphs 21 and 22 of Taxation Ruling TR 92/20).

1. From 1 April 1994, entertainment provided by an employer may give rise to a fringe benefits tax liability. However, only that part of the benefit which relates to entertainment provided to an employee (or an associate of an employee) will be subject to fringe benefits tax. Accordingly, where the entertainment is provided to employees and non-employees jointly, it is necessary to determine that part of the benefit which relates only to the employees.

2. Where that part of the benefit which relates to employees only is not easily extracted from the available information, this Office will accept the use of a 'per head' basis of apportionment. This does not, of course, preclude employers from using an exact expense basis if they wish.

Example

Mary entertains 3 of her employer's clients at a local restaurant on 15 April 1994. In addition to paying for her own meal, Mary pays for the meals of the clients. Mary's employer reimburses Mary for the cost of the meals. The benefit provided to Mary is an expense payment fringe benefit. The taxable value of that benefit will be accepted as 25% of the amount reimbursed to Mary.

Commissioner of Taxation
31/3/94

Previously issued as Draft TD 94/D15

References

ATO references:
NO FBT Cell 30/81

ISSN 1038 - 8982

Subject References:
entertainment,
apportionment,
expense payment fringe benefit,
residual fringe benefit,
property fringe benefit

TD 94/25 history

	Date:	Version:	Change:
You are here	31 March 1994	Original ruling
	1 June 2005	Consolidated ruling	Addendum

Copyright notice

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).