Taxation Ruling
TR 96/17W
Income tax: work-related expenses: deductibility of expenses on rehydrating moisturiser and rehydrating hair conditioner
-
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this withdrawal notice.This document has changed over time. View its history.
FOI status:
may be releasedNotice of Withdrawal
Taxation Ruling TR 96/17 is withdrawn with effect from today.
Taxation Ruling TR 96/17 sets out the Taxation Office's views on the deductibility of expenses incurred in respect of rehydrating moisturiser and rehydrating hair conditioner, following the decision of the Federal Court of Australia in Mansfield v. FC of T 96 ATC 4001; (1995) 31 ATR 367.
TR 96/17 has been incorporated into Draft Taxation Ruling TR 2003/D4, which issues today. TR 2003/D4 consolidates into the one taxation ruling the various taxation rulings and determinations previously issued in relation to the deductibility of items used for protection against illness or injury in the course of earning assessable income.
Commissioner of Taxation
11 June 2003
References
ATO references:
NO 2002/011971
Related Rulings/Determinations:
TR 2003/D4
Date: | Version: | Change: | |
29 May 1996 | Original ruling | ||
4 August 1999 | Consolidated ruling | Addendum | |
You are here | 11 June 2003 | Withdrawn |
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).