ato logo
Search Suggestion:

Methodology

The method we use to estimate the PAYG withholding gap.

Published 31 October 2024

What has changed

We have changed our methodology in 2024 to use a random enquiry program (REP) based bottom-up statistical model to estimate the PAYG withholding gap. Acknowledging this is the first year of applying a bottom-up approach methodology to inform gap estimate results and is subject to further enhancements.

Step 1: Estimate unreported PAYG withholdings

Unreported tax consists of the additional tax expected to be raised if we undertook compliance activity on the portion of the tax base not covered. It arises from incorrectly reported tax returns, as unreported withholdings, from the active employing entities population.

We use the REP compliance outcomes to determine the average amendment amount and average rate of amendments. These results are then extrapolated to the whole of the active employing entities to calculate the estimated unreported tax amount.

Step 2: Estimate non-detection

We take the estimated unreported tax from Step 1 and uplift it to account for amounts that are not detected.

Step 3: Estimate non-pursuable debt

We add estimated non-pursuable debt.

Step 4: Calculate the gross gap and net gap

We combine the amounts determined above for amendments, unreported tax, and non-detection with non-pursuable debt to obtain the gross and net tax gaps. The net gap is equal to the gross gap less amendments.

We then add the gross gap to the tax voluntarily paid amount to estimate the theoretical tax liability. We calculate the gap percentages by dividing the gap estimate by the theoretical tax liability.

Summary of the estimation process

Table 2 provides a summary of each step of the estimation process and the results for each year.

Table 2: Summary of estimation process (value) for PAYG withholding gap

Step

Description

2016–17

2017–18

2018–19

2019–20

2020–21

2021–22

1.1

Population

871,272

873,210

857,337

903,261

1,017,939

1,003,474

1.2

Voluntary expected collections ($m)

174,766

187,378

199,126

211,877

218,568

238,048

2.1

Amendments ($m)

3,231

3,464

4,381

1,987

1,383

1,905

2.2

Expected collections ($m)

177,997

190,842

203,507

213,864

219,951

239,953

3

Unreported tax($m) (see Note)

995

984

298

2,916

3,843

3,595

4

Non-pursuable debt ($m)

621

660

701

735

747

809

5.1

Gross gap ($m)

4,847

5,108

5,380

5,638

5,973

6,309

5.2

Net gap ($m)

1,616

1,644

999

3,651

4,590

4,404

6.1

Theoretical liability ($m)

179,613

192,486

204,506

217,515

224,541

244,357

6.2

Gross gap (%)

2.7%

2.7%

2.6%

2.6%

2.7%

2.6%

6.3

Net gap (%)

0.9%

0.9%

0.5%

1.7%

2.0%

1.8%

Note: Non-detection is captured within unreported tax component

Find out more about our overall methodology, data sources and analysis used for creating our tax gap estimates.

Limitations

The current methodology provides an aggregated estimate of the PAYG withholding gap.

The assumptions we use to construct our estimate are informed by actual data and expert opinion. The following caveats and limitations apply when interpreting this tax gap estimate:

  • The precision of the estimate is limited by the sample size – we use a bundled sample.
  • The true extent of non-detection is unknown and is challenging to measure. We assume there will be errors and omissions in our compliance activities due to factors outside our control and limitations in operational capability and capacity.
  • The true extent and distribution of hidden wages is challenging to measure. We assume be shadow economy behaviour in this population.

Accounting for non-detection in the gap

We account for non-detection by applying an uplift factor to amendments and hidden wages. The impact of non-detection on the PAYG withholding gap is estimated to be $5,016 million in 2021–22.

Not all errors are detected through the REP. We account for these by applying a non-detection uplift to the unreported tax liability estimate.

The 2 sources of non-detection for this tax gap relate to:

  • PAYG withholding misreporting
  • hidden wages.

The unreported tax liability is divided into the above elements, with an appropriate non-detection factor then applied to each portion.

 

Source of non-detection

2016–17
($m)

2017–18
($m)

2018–19
($m)

2019–20
($m)

2020–21
($m)

2021–22 ($m)

PAYG withholding misreporting (excluding hidden wages)

154

166

173

194

246

242

Hidden wages

3,763

3,951

4,160

4,321

4,489

4,773

Total non-detection

3,917

4,117

4,333

4,515

4,734

5,016

 

Updates and revisions to previous estimates

Each year we refresh our estimates in line with our annual report. Changes from previously published estimates occur for a variety of reasons, including:

  • improvements in methodology and assumptions
  • revisions to data
  • additional information becoming available.

Figure 2 displays the net gap estimates from our current model compared to the previous estimates.

Figure 2: Current and previous PAYG withholding gap estimates, 2008–09 to 2021–22

Figure 2 depicts the net gap estimates from previously published years as outlined in Table 3.

The data is presented in Table 3.

Table 3: Current and previous PAYG withholding net gap estimates (percentage), 2008–09 to 2021–22

Year published

2008–09

2009–10

2010–11

2011–12

2012–13

2013–14

2014–15

2015–16

2016–17

2017–18

2018–19

2019–20

2020–21

2021–22

2024

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

0.9%

0.9%

0.5%

1.7%

2.0%

1.8%

2024 superseded model

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

4.2%

3.3%

2.9%

2.7%

1.7%

0.9%

2023

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

4.1%.

3.9%

3.1%

2.6%

2.4%

1.7%

n/a

2022

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

3.9%

3.6%

3.5%

2.6%

1.9%

1.5%

n/a

n/a

2021

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

2.9%

2.7%

2.4%

1.7%

1.8%

1.6%

n/a

n/a

n/a

2020

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

3.0%

2.9%

2.7%

2.3%

1.7%

1.8%

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

2019

n/a

n/a

n/a

4.2%

3.0%

2.8%

2.7%

2.2%

1.7%

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

2018

n/a

n/a

4.3%

4.1%

2.9%

2.7%

2.6%

1.9%

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

2017

n/a

3.7%

4.0%

4.1%

2.9%

2.7%

1.9%

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

2016

2.5%

2.5%

2.9%

3.0%

2.1%

1.4%

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

2015

2.0%

2.1%

2.2%

2.1%

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

 

QC103278