Meaning of 'gross' versus 'net'
The TOFA tax return labels – quick reference guide provides taxpayers with an option to report TOFA gains and TOFA losses on a 'net' basis. This is taking into account that reporting on a "gross" basis could be a compliance burden in separating the financial arrangement gains from the losses for certain types of financial arrangements like derivatives.
In the quick reference guide, reporting on a gross basis means that taxpayers don't net off the expense from the income from the same type of financial arrangement. This is particularly relevant for financial arrangements like loans. The quick reference guide provides a specific example stating that interest income and interest expense should be reported on a gross basis. As an example, $100,000 interest income and $40,000 of interest expense in Australia is reported as:
- Gross basis
- $100,000 in Label 6F Gross interest; and
- $40,000 in Label 6V interest expenses in Australia.
- Net basis:
- $60,000 in Label 6F Gross interest.
In contrast, throughout the rest of this page, unless otherwise specified, 'gross' basis is referring to a practice among some taxpayers, involving the inclusion of the value of the notional principal amounts as a TOFA gain or loss, and 'net' basis is referring to situations involving the inclusion of the actual income or expense – actual gain or loss arising from the financial arrangement, rather than the value of the notional principal amounts associated with the financial arrangements.
Choosing to report on a 'gross' or 'net' basis
We strongly advise taxpayers to report on a net basis in the relevant labels of the income tax returns to:
- avoid income or expenses being significantly inflated unnecessarily and inappropriately.
- ensure a consistent approach to reporting being adopted by taxpayers.
When considering whether to report on a gross or net basis, taxpayers should be aware of other potential implications – even though the choice may not impact the tax payable figure.
How the data can be used
We use the profit and loss information in the company tax return for data analysis purposes, including comparative analysis for risk assessment purposes.
In some cases, we may look at various financial ratios including tax payable relative to total income to analyse a benchmark across an industry.
The total income figure in the company tax return is also reported in the annual corporate tax transparency report which is published on our website. This report is subject to public scrutiny and can lead to incorrect inferences where taxpayers have reported notional principal amounts in total income.
In addition, on 22 June 2023 the Australian Parliament passed legislation establishing the Financial Services Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR). This scheme is designed to make payments on a last-resort basis to eligible consumers where determinations by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) for compensation remain unpaid in the financial sub-sectors specified in the legislation.
The one-time levy came from the 10 largest banking and insurance groups determined by income reported to us for the 2022 income year. This means ASIC identified the 10 largest banking and insurance groups using the corporate tax transparency report data on total income with the levy being imposed on total income as originally reported in the company income tax return.
Various provisions in the income tax legislation including reporting obligations are dependent on the value of total income, including but not limited to the following:
- the significant global entity concept which defines:
- the population subject to the multinational anti-avoidance law (MAAL) and country-by-country (CBC) reporting,
- the entities required to give the Commissioner a general purpose financial statement
- the entities that may be subject to the diverted profits tax and increased administrative and other penalties
- whether you are considered a small business entity
- whether you are required to pay PAYG instalments on a monthly basis
- whether you are required to complete the Reportable tax position (RTP) schedule
- the R&D tax incentive offset rate for eligible entities.
Use a consistent method
Whether you report using the gross or net basis, you must use the same method consistently throughout the income tax return.
To ensure the method applied remains consistent, we strongly advised that accounting systems be mapped such that:
- The total TOFA gains reported at item 6 and label 7E TOFA income from financial arrangements not included at Item 6 should match the amount reported at label 8T Total TOFA gains
- The total TOFA losses reported at item 6 and label 7W TOFA deductions not included at item 6 should match the amount reported at item 8U Total TOFA losses
- The total TOFA gains reported at item 6 as a result of unrealised movements in the value of financial arrangements should match the amount reported at label 8S TOFA gains from unrealised movements in the value of financial arrangements.
How to report on a net basis
Example: reporting on a net basis
Bank A entered into an FX swap transaction whereby it paid USD 70 million and in return received AUD 100 million. The TOFA rules apply to Bank A and the default method applies to the FX swap. The spot exchange rate is 0.71. Bank A’s accounting system picks up the principal amounts as income and expenses – it recorded income of AUD 100 million and expense of AUD 98.59 million (which is the AUD equivalent of USD 70 million at an exchange rate of 0.71).
The better economic reflection of income is AUD 1.41 million (being AUD 100 million less AUD 98.59 million) and Bank A is encouraged to report on a net basis and include the following in the income tax return:
- AUD 1.41 million into Label 6R Other gross income
- AUD 1.41 million into Label 8T Total TOFA gains.
Income tax return labels relevant to the FX swap |
Net basis |
Gross basis |
---|---|---|
6R Other gross income |
$1,410,000 |
$100,000,000 |
6S Total income |
$1,410,000 |
$100,000,000 |
6S All other expenses |
Nil |
$98,590,000 |
6Q Total expense |
Nil |
$98,590,000 |
6T Total profit or loss |
$1,410,000 |
$1,410,000 |
8T Total TOFA gains |
$1,410,000 |
$100,000,000 |
8U Total TOFA losses |
Nil |
$98,590,000 |
End of example
Examples of common types of financial arrangements
The following are examples of how a company should disclose the gains and losses from a financial arrangement depending on the tax-timing method applicable to the financial arrangement.
You should follow priority rules in section 230-40 of the ITAA 1997 to determine which tax-timing method takes priority where more than one tax-timing method apply to a financial arrangement.
The following examples are intended to illustrate the implications to the disclosures in the income tax return depending on the different tax-timing method.
Foreign currency denominated loan – Foreign exchange retranslation method
Example: applying the foreign exchange retranslation method
Company A is an Authorised Deposit taking Institution with aggregated turnover exceeding $20 million annually. Company A meets the eligibility criteria to make the foreign exchange retranslation method – general election under the TOFA rules.
During the current income year, Company A obtained a loan of US$1 million and in accordance with AASB 121, the gains and losses associated with the principal amount, that are attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates, must be recognised in its profit and loss. The terms of the loan specify that the principal of US$1 million must be repaid at the end of the fourth year. At the time the loan was entered into, Company A incurred a liability of A$1,428,571.
The exchange rate at each point in time are:
- Year 0: A$1 = US$0.7
- Year 1: A$1 = US$0.8
- Year 2: A$1 = US$0.9
- Year 3: A$1 = US$0.85
- Year 4: A$1 = US$0.75
Currency exchange movements and associated gains and losses |
Year 0 |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loan outstanding (US$) |
$1,000,000 |
$1,000,000 |
$1,000,000 |
$1,000,000 |
$0 |
A$ value of loan |
$1,428,571 |
$1,250,000 |
$1,111,111 |
$1,176,471 |
$1,333,333 |
Tax treatment (gains or losses) under the foreign exchange retranslation method |
$0 |
$178,571 |
$138,889 |
-$65,360 |
-$156,862 (see Note) |
Income tax return labels relevant to the currency fluctuations of the loan |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
6J Unrealised gains on revaluation of assets to fair value |
$178,571 |
$138,889 |
Nil |
Nil |
6S Total income |
$178,571 |
$138,889 |
Nil |
Nil |
6G Unrealised losses on revaluation of assets to fair value |
Nil |
Nil |
$65,360 |
Nil |
6S All other expenses |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
$156,862 (see Note) |
6Q Total expense |
Nil |
Nil |
$65,360 |
$156,862 |
6T Total profit or loss |
$178,571 |
$138,889 |
-$65,360 |
-$156,862 |
8T Total TOFA gains |
$178,571 |
$138,889 |
Nil |
Nil |
8U Total TOFA losses |
Nil |
Nil |
$65,360 |
$156,862 (see Note) |
8S TOFA gains from unrealised movements in the value of financial arrangements |
$178,571 |
$138,889 |
Nil |
Nil |
Note: During the fourth year, on cessation of the financial arrangement being the repayment of the principle of the loan, Subdivision 230-G balancing adjustment applies and calculates the balancing adjustment to be a loss of $156,862.
The balancing adjustment is calculated as follows:
(1,428,571 − 1,333,333) − 178,571 − 138,889 + 65,360 = − $156,862
End of exampleOptions – Fair value method
Example: applying the fair value method
Company B is an Australian public company with an aggregated turnover exceeding $100 million annually. Company B meets the eligibility criteria to make the fair value method election under the TOFA rules.
During the current income year, Company B purchased an option to acquire 1 million shares in Company C for $10 million. As the option is a derivative recognised at fair value through profit or loss for accounting purposes, the fair value method applies to the option. At the end of the fourth year Company B sells the option to an external third party for $15 million.
Movement in fair value and associated gains and losses |
Year 1 (fair value) |
Year 2 (fair value) |
Year 3 (fair value) |
>
Year 4 (disposal) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fair value as at year end |
$14,000,000 |
$17,000,000 |
$13,000,000 |
$15,000,000 |
Tax treatment (gains or losses)under the fair value method |
$4,000,000 |
$3,000,000 |
−$4,000,000 |
$2,000,000 (see Note) |
Income tax return labels relevant to the fair value movements of the option |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
6J Unrealised gains on revaluation of assets to fair value |
$4,000,000 |
$3,000,000 |
Nil |
Nil |
6R Other gross income |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
$2,000,000 (see Note) |
6S Total income |
$4,000,000 |
$3,000,000 |
Nil |
$2,000,000 |
6G Unrealised losses on revaluation of assets to fair value |
Nil |
Nil |
$4,000,000 |
Nil |
6Q Total expense |
Nil |
Nil |
$4,000,000 |
Nil |
6T Total profit or loss |
$4,000,000 |
$3,000,000 |
−$4,000,000 |
$2,000,000 |
8T Total TOFA gains |
$4,000,000 |
$3,000,000 |
Nil |
$2,000,000 (see Note) |
8U Total TOFA losses |
Nil |
Nil |
$4,000,000 |
Nil |
8S TOFA gains from unrealised movements in the value of financial arrangements |
$4,000,000 |
$3,000,000 |
Nil |
Nil |
Note: During the fourth year, on cessation of all of Company B’s rights and obligations under the option, Subdivision 230-G balancing adjustment applies and calculates the balancing adjustment to be a gain of $2,000,000.
The balancing adjustment is calculated as follows:
($15,000,000 − $10,000,000) − $4,000,000 − $3,000,000 + $4,000,000 = $2,000,000
End of exampleMultiple financial arrangements – Reliance on financial reports method
Example: applying reliance on financial reports method
Company C is an Authorised Deposit taking Institution with aggregated turnover exceeding $20 million annually. Company A meets the eligibility criteria to make the reliance on financial reports election under the TOFA rules.
Company C holds 2 million shares in Company A and is an equal share partner of a partnership with Company E.
At the beginning of the current income year, Company C entered into the following financial arrangements:
- Borrowed $10 million via a loan from an external third-party lender in Australia. The terms of the loan specify that interest payable on the loan is 5% per annum and the principle must be paid at the end of the seventh year.
- Borrowed $1 million via a loan from an external third-party lender in Australia. The terms of the loan specify that interest payable on the loan is 15% per annum and the principle must be repaid at the end of the fourth year.
- Loaned $15 million to an external third-party borrower in Australia. The terms of the loan specify that interest payable on the loan is 6% per annum and the principle must be paid at the end of the sixth year.
- Purchased an option to acquire 1 million shares in Company B for $8 million, the option expires at the end of the fifth year from the time of purchase.
- Purchased an option to acquire 1 million shares in Company D for $6 million, the option expires at the end of the sixth year from the time of purchase.
Interest paid |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Secured inbound loan |
$500,000 |
$500,000 |
$500,000 |
Unsecured inbound loan |
$150,000 |
$150,000 |
$150,000 |
Interest received |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Outbound loan |
$900,000 |
$900,000 |
$900,000 |
Breakdown of gains and losses attributable to movements in the value of the options purchased as shown on its audited financial reports at the end of the first 3 years from the current income year
Movement in fair value and associated gains and losses |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Fair value option price |
$10,000,000 |
$7,000,000 |
$6,000,000 |
Gains or losses |
$2,000,000 |
−$3,000,000 |
-$1,000,000 |
Movement in fair value and associated gains and losses |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Fair value option price |
$7,000,000 |
$9,000,000 |
$11,000,000 |
Gains or losses |
$1,000,000 |
$2,000,000 |
$2,000,000 |
In addition, Company C receives unfranked dividends from Company A and is also entitled to their share of partnership income.
Income received |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Dividends received from Company A |
$600,000 |
$400,000 |
$500,000 |
Share of partnership income |
$450,000 |
$550,000 |
$600,000 |
Note that the unfranked dividends and share of partnership income received by Company C are from financial arrangements subject to the TOFA rules.
Income tax return labels relevant to Company C's financial arrangements |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
---|---|---|---|
6D Gross distribution from partnerships |
$450,000 |
$550,000 |
$600,000 |
6F Gross interest |
$900,000 |
$900,000 |
$900,000 |
6H Total dividends |
$600,000 |
$400,000 |
$500,000 |
6J Unrealised gains on revaluation of assets to fair value |
$3,000,000 (see Note 1) |
Nil |
$1,000,000 (see Note 3) |
6S Total income |
$4,950,000 |
$1,850,000 |
$3,000,000 |
6V Interest expenses within Australia |
$650,000 |
$650,000 |
$650,000 |
6G Unrealised losses on revaluation of assets to fair value |
Nil |
$1,000,000 (see Note 2) |
Nil |
6Q Total expense |
$650,000 |
$1,650,000 |
$650,000 |
6T Total profit or loss |
$4,300,000 |
$200,000 |
$2,350,000 |
8T Total TOFA gains |
$4,950,000 |
$1,850,000 |
$3,000,000 |
8U Total TOFA losses |
$650,000 |
$1,650,000 |
$650,000 |
8S TOFA gains from unrealised movements in the value of financial arrangements |
$3,000,000 |
Nil |
$1,000,000 |
Note 1: $3,000,000 is calculated as the gains in unrealised movement from revaluation of Option 1 of $2 million and the gains in unrealised movement from revaluation of Option 2 of $1 million.
Note 2: $1,000,000 is calculated as the losses in unrealised movement from revaluation of Option 1 of $3 million and the gains in unrealised movement from revaluation of Option 2 of $2 million.
Note 3: $1,000,000 is calculated as the losses in unrealised movement from revaluation of Option 1 of $1 million and the gains in unrealised movement from revaluation of Option 2 of $2 million.
End of example