About the reporting changes
From 1 January 2025:
- Country by Country Reporting Entities (CbCREs) will use an updated version of the Local File/Master File (LCMSF) service for lodgments for reporting periods starting on or after 1 January 2024
- LCMSF Schema Version 4.0 (V 4.0) will incorporate the short form (SF) section of the local file into the Message Structure Table (MST).
The current design of the SF requires CbCREs to disclose information about their Australian entities and operations in an LCMSF attachment.
This approach isn't delivering a sufficient level of information for SF reporting. SF reporting is used to detect higher risk international tax structuring and profit shifting arrangements. The current design of the SF as an LCMSF attachment results in:
- inconsistent reporting content
- inconsistent reporting format or structure
- incomplete information in some reports not satisfying the level of reporting required in the SF instructions.
When reporting changes apply
V 4.0 will apply to statements lodged from 1 January 2025 relating to reporting periods starting on or after 1 January 2024.
Statements relating to reporting periods starting before 1 January 2024 may continue to lodge using LCMSF Schema Version 3.0 (V 3.0), though we will encourage the use of V 4.0 for all reporting periods.
V 3.0 is expected to be deactivated for all reporting periods on 1 January 2026.
Quarter |
Element |
---|---|
May to June 2024 |
V 4.0 draft specifications to digital service providers (including external vendor testing environment code deployment). |
July to September 2024 |
|
July to December 2024 |
Building and testing by digital service providers. |
LCMSF Schema Version 4.0 summarised
V 4.0 will incorporate the information currently required in the SF as summarised in the tables.
Current short form requirements |
V 4.0 LCMSF MST field requirements |
---|---|
Provide a description of your business and strategy. You should:
When describing your business and the strategies deployed for each business line or function, you should consider consistency with the other disclosures such as those made in the director's report section of your annual report (if applicable) or those made in other management or reporting documents. Provide a list of key competitors of the reporting entity. The list of key competitors should be provided for all of your main business lines and functions identified in your disclosures relating to your business and strategy. |
|
Current short form requirements |
V 4.0 LCMSF MST field requirements |
---|---|
You should include:
If there was any change during the income year in the most senior Australian based individuals to whom the local staff reported for each separately reporting local business line or function, or in the individuals or countries to which the most senior Australian based individuals reported, provide:
|
Current short form requirements |
V 4.0 LCMSF MST field requirements |
---|---|
You should describe any significant business restructures that have occurred during the reporting period or previous income year, and an explanation of its significance, including:
This covers any significant changes of, and disposals or acquisitions by, any member of your Australian consolidated group or MEC group, and any of your CFCs. In determining whether a change, disposal or acquisition is significant, take into account the anticipated impact on your Australian tax liabilities for the income period and following income years, including any anticipated impact on Australian withholding tax liabilities. The description should include:
(Examples are included which illustrate the required level of reporting for each connected step of the restructure) |
(Yes/No)
|
Current short form requirements |
V 4.0 LCMSF MST field requirements |
---|---|
You should describe any transfer of intangibles including any connected arrangements, such as related party licensing or service agreements, that occurred in the current or previous income year. The term intangible includes property, assets or rights that are not physical or financial assets, which are capable of being owned or controlled for use in commercial activities. Examples of intangibles include intellectual property, goodwill, rights under service or distribution agreements, know-how and the right to access secret information or processes. The description should include:
This covers any transfer of intangibles by any member of your Australian consolidated group or MEC group, or by any of your CFCs. (Examples are included which illustrate the required level of reporting for each connected step of the intangibles arrangement) |
Covered by MST fields for Restructures (above). |
Why reporting is changing
LCMSF Schema Version 4.0 is expected to:
- Simplify reporting requirements for the majority of CbCREs that don’t have:
- personnel reporting overseas
- restructures (including changes in related party financing)
- new intangibles arrangements.
- Increase reporting efficiency through combined MST reporting fields covering both:
- restructures
- new intangibles arrangements.
- Enable use of structured SF reporting data in ATO analysis and risk detection.
- Reduce the need for the ATO to identify and follow up incomplete information.
- Reduce the ability to avoid the required level of SF reporting.
- Include minor adjustments to existing validation rules for the full local file.
- Move the fields for attaching financial accounts to clarify that financial accounts can separately be lodged with the SF section and do not have to be lodged with Local File - Part B.
More information
If you have any questions or feedback about the reporting changes, email LCMSFversion4@ato.gov.au.
Appendix 1: Summary of ATO Response to V4 Consultation Feedback
No |
Feedback |
Response |
---|---|---|
1 |
Clarify how different business lines or functions are determined, e.g. how to treat back-office functions including HR, IT, finance and legal |
Adopted Revised instructions will clarify that:
|
2 |
Remove reference to ‘function’ because this is a transfer pricing concept |
Not adopted ‘Function’ has always been used by the ATO in the short form instructions in its general meaning of a business line or activity. It is not intended to be restricted to the meaning of ‘function’ for the purposes of the OECD’s transfer pricing guidelines. |
3 |
Provide an example of a non-reportable business line or function |
Adopted The example in the revised instructions will be extended to illustrate how supporting functions (as above) are not reportable as a separate business lines or function. |
No |
Feedback |
Response |
---|---|---|
4 |
Remove requirement to report names of overseas personnel, e.g., due to privacy obligations |
Adopted We have now changed the message structure table (MST) to make the relevant field non-mandatory. We have also made the name field for reporting local individual personnel non-mandatory. |
5 |
Remove requirement to report residency of overseas personnel, e.g., due to difficulty in determining residency |
Adopted We have now changed the MST to make the relevant field non-mandatory. |
6 |
Clarify the meaning of ‘effective’ reporting |
Adopted Revised instructions will clarify that effective reporting means accountable reporting. We have removed references to direct and indirect reporting. |
7 |
Narrow the types of reportable changes in reporting arrangements and limit to final year end position only |
Partially adopted Revised instructions will clarify that short term and temporary changes to reporting arrangements do not need to be reported. Consistent with current short form instructions as reflected in previously lodged short forms, we continue to require non-temporary changes in reporting during the income year to be reported. |
8 |
Limit the number of reporting lines that must be disclosed to reduce compliance burden |
Not adopted We do not think it is necessary or appropriate to put a cap on the amount of reporting lines that need to be disclosed. Reporting of overseas reporting is already limited to the most senior personnel for the business line or function, as reflecting how the business is organised. |
9 |
Short form reporting should be confined to general ‘management’ reporting to overseas personnel and should not include overseas reporting by the ‘most senior individual’ for a business line or function |
Not adopted The current short form instructions require reporting ‘for the most senior Australian based individuals … for each separately reporting local business line or function’. The revised instructions will provide an example where person A reports to ‘management – CEO’ and also effectively reports (as the most senior Australian based individual for a separately reporting business line) to overseas personnel for that global business line. |
No |
Feedback |
Response |
---|---|---|
10 |
Clarify meaning of restructure and significant restructure |
Adopted Revised instructions will change the meaning of significant restructure. The revised instructions will provide that significant restructures include:
|
11 |
Requests to clarify that certain types of restructures are non-reportable restructures |
Adopted Revised instructions will expressly treat the following kinds of restructures as not reportable:
|
12 |
Introduce materiality thresholds for restructures to reduce reporting |
Partially adopted As above, the revised instructions will introduce a materiality threshold of $10m for new, replaced or terminated related party financing arrangements. |
13 |
Reportable ‘creation of intangibles (IP)’ should be narrowed so all types of creation of IP are not reportable restructures |
Adopted The revised instructions will:
|
14 |
Clarify the meaning of connected steps |
Adopted The revised instructions will provide:
|
15 |
Remove reporting requirement for prior year restructures to current year reporting only |
Not adopted for 2024 Short form reporting has always required reporting of significant restructures implemented in the current or previous year on an ongoing basis, consistent with Annexure II in the OECD Action 13 ReportExternal Link. We will reconsider our current approach having regard to the implementation and ongoing operation of structured short form reporting using V4. |
16 |
There should be special carve outs for banks for reporting significant financing restructures |
TBA The ATO has requested the stakeholders which raised this issue for more detail about relevant scenarios and is open to receiving further feedback. We intend to continue engaging with interested stakeholders on this issue. |
No |
Feedback |
Response |
---|---|---|
17 |
Short form reporting is ‘beyond power’ or ‘invalid’ under Subdivision 815-E of the ITAA 1997 because it has not been limited to reporting of transactions or restructuring raising ‘transfer pricing risks’, e.g., transactions covered by TR 2011/1 |
Not agreed The ATO considers that the current short form reporting requirements and the proposed structured short form reporting requirements using V4 are an appropriate ‘approved form’ under subsection 815-355External Link(1) of the ITAA. Such approved form relevantly relates to ‘operations, activities, dealings and transactions’ of the reporting entity within the meaning of paragraph 815-355External Link(3)(b) of the ITAA 1997, and relevantly corresponds or relates to Annexure II of the OECD Action 13 ReportExternal Link. Australia’s approach to transfer pricing rules reflect the specific provisions in Division 815 of the ITAA having regard to relevant Australian court decisions, for example, the decision of the Full Federal court in Chevron Australia Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2017] FCAFC 62External Link. The OECD Action 13 ReportExternal Link expressly refers to use of CbC reporting information in risk assessment or evaluation of transfer pricing risks and other Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) risks. Assessment of transfer pricing risks (and of other BEPS risks) includes considering:
|
18 |
Reduce duplication of reporting with RTP Schedule, International Dealings Schedule (IDS) and processes for Top 100 taxpayers |
Partially adopted with further changes TBA Changes are being proposed to the RTP Schedule instructions to reduce provision of duplicated information in the RTP Schedule comments for relevant arrangements (where information about relevant restructures is provided in the short form). Further consideration is being given to changes to the IDS instructions to address duplication. Structured V4 short form reporting on significant restructures by CbC reporting entities will be an important set of data used by the ATO for population analysis and reporting. In relation to Top 100 program processes:
|
19 |
Australian reporting entities not currently in possession of relevant offshore information in their global group should not have any obligation to obtain or provide this information in short form reporting, e.g., information about tax status of offshore related counterparties or connected transactions between offshore members of global group |
Not agreed An Australian reporting entity should request their global group’s personnel for information relevant to meeting its short form reporting about overseas reporting arrangements, significant restructures or new intangibles arrangements, for example, information held offshore by the group on:
Reporting entities are expected to have made reasonable documented inquiries of offshore group personnel who may be expected to hold relevant information, including personnel of the:
|