A private ruling is a written expression of opinion by the Commissioner of Taxation (the Commissioner) about the way in which tax laws and other specified laws administered by the Commissioner apply, or would apply, to an entity for a specified scheme.
An application for a private ruling must be made in the approved form and in accordance with Divisions 357 and 359 of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (TAA).
The required information and documentation that accompany a private ruling request must be sufficient for the Commissioner to make a private ruling and include:
- the entity to whom the ruling is to apply
- the facts describing the relevant scheme
- relevant supporting documents such as transaction documents
- issues and questions raised relating to the relevant provision to which the ruling relates
- your arguments and references on such questions.
The Commissioner may request additional information to make a ruling. The Commissioner will then consider the request and either issue or, in certain limited circumstances, refuse to issue a private ruling.
Publication
To improve the administration of the private rulings system, we now publish all notices of private rulings for public record on the Legal database.
Private rulings are published in an edited form to safeguard taxpayer privacy.
Private ruling applicants are invited to provide a statement detailing any information they believe should be removed from the published version of their private ruling.
If the information the applicant wants removed is more than simply names and addresses, reasons why publication of this information will breach the applicant’s privacy should be provided.
Before publication, applicants can comment on the edited version of their private ruling.
Review rights
Generally, taxpayers can object to adverse private rulings or a failure to make a private ruling in much the same way that they can object to assessments. If a taxpayer is dissatisfied with the Commissioner's decision on an objection, they can apply to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) for a review of the decision, or appeal to the Federal Court against the decision. An explanation of review rights and how to exercise them is issued with the private ruling.
A taxpayer cannot object to a private ruling if there is an assessment for the taxpayer for the same income year to which the ruling relates. If this is the case, the taxpayer can only object to the assessment.
Where a taxpayer has objected to a private ruling, the taxpayer cannot object to a later assessment relating to the same matter ruled on, unless the assessment relates to facts that are materially different from those dealt with in the private ruling, or deals with the application of tax law provisions not dealt with in the private ruling (for example, the application of Part IVA of the ITAA 1936).
Private rulings dealing with the ITAA 1936 continue to apply to the ITAA 1997, to the extent that the old law to which the ruling applies expresses the same ideas as the new law in the ITAA 1997.
See also:
When rulings are binding
A private ruling is binding on the Commissioner where it applies to an entity and the entity has relied on the ruling by acting (or omitting to act) in accordance with the private ruling. A private ruling only applies to the particular scheme or circumstance that it describes. If there is a material difference between the scheme described and what actually occurs, the private ruling is ineffective.
An entity can stop relying on a private ruling at any time (unless prevented by a time limit imposed by a taxation law) by acting (or omitting to act) in a way that is not in accordance with the private ruling; and can subsequently resume relying on the private ruling by acting accordingly. The Commissioner cannot withdraw a private ruling. However, where the scheme to which a private ruling relates has not begun to be carried out and where the private ruling relates to an income year or other accounting period, and that period has not begun, the Commissioner can make a revised private ruling.