ACIS Administration Act 1999 (Repealed)

PART 12 - ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF CERTAIN DECISIONS  

SECTION 111  

111   REVIEW OF DECISIONS AFFECTING DUTY CREDIT  
Applications may be made to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for the review of decisions of the following kinds:

(aa) a decision by the Secretary under subsection 6C(3) that the circumstances of a relationship between 2 persons do not fall within the circumstances set out in guidelines made under subsection 6C(2);

(ab) a decision by the Secretary under subsection 6C(4) that it is not reasonable to allow the investment by an original investor to be treated as eligible investment by a participant;

(ac) a decision by the Secretary under subparagraph 6C(5)(b)(i) that investment by an original investor, if undertaken by a participant, would not be eligible investment;

(ad) a decision by the Secretary under subparagraph 6C(5)(b)(ii) that it is not reasonable to allow the investment by an original investor to be treated as eligible investment by a participant;

(a) a decision by the Secretary under guidelines made under paragraph 9(3)(a) that a person was a party to a transaction that was not at arm ' s length within the meaning of that section;

(b) a decision by the Secretary under guidelines made under paragraph 9(3)(b) as to the production value or sales value of the motor vehicles, engines, or engine components to which a transaction that has been determined as not being at arm ' s length relates;

(c) a decision by the Secretary under guidelines made under paragraph 9(3)(c) as to the production value or sales value of the goods or services to which a transaction that has been determined as not being at arm ' s length relates;

(d) a decision by the Secretary under guidelines made under paragraph 9(3)(d) as to the amount of investment in plant and equipment services to which a transaction that has been determined as not being at arm ' s length relates;

(e) a decision by the Secretary under guidelines made under paragraph 9(3)(e) as to the amount of investment in research and development to which a transaction that has been determined as not being at arm ' s length relates;

(f) a decision by the Secretary under guidelines made under section 10 as to whether an ACIS participant is entitled to duty credit;

(fa) a decision by the Secretary under subsection 42(1):

(i) not to issue an MVP with unmodulated uncapped production credit; or

(ii) as to the amount of any credit to be so issued;

(g) a decision by the Secretary under section 56:

(i) not to issue an MVP with modulated capped production credit; or

(ii) as to the amount of any credit to be so issued;

(h) a decision by the Secretary under section 57:

(i) not to issue an MVP with modulated investment credit; or

(ii) as to the amount of any credit to be so issued;

(i) a decision by the Secretary under section 59:

(i) not to issue an ACP, AMTP or ASP with modulated investment credit; or

(ii) as to the amount of any credit to be so issued;

(j) a decision under the R & D scheme:

(i) not to issue an MVP with unmodulated type J investment credit; or

(ii) as to the amount of any credit to be so issued.