ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2003/315

Fringe Benefits Tax

Loan fringe benefits: loans with limited recourse loan facility
FOI status: may be released

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Can a limited recourse loan facility attached to an employee loan give rise to a residual fringe benefit or property fringe benefit under the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA)?

Decision

No. The provision of a loan with a limited recourse loan facility to an employee can only give rise to a loan fringe benefit.

Facts

An associate of an employer provides an employee with a limited recourse loan with which to acquire shares.

Under the terms of the loan agreement the employee may elect to transfer the shares to the lender in full and final satisfaction of the loan balance.

The terms of the loan agreement are accepted as being commercial.

The provision of the loan gives rise to a 'loan fringe benefit' as defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA.

Reasons for Decision

When the employee is provided with a limited recourse loan the non-recourse feature of the loan protects the employee from loss, should the value of the shares be below the loan balance when the loan is discharged. This protection is commonly referred to as downside risk protection (DRP).

Thus, under the terms of the loan agreement, the employee is considered to obtain at least two advantages or benefits - one being the use of the lenders money, the other being the right to DRP.

The right to DRP may give rise to a property benefit or alternatively a residual benefit provided it is not also a benefit pursuant to Division 4 of Part III of the FBTAA (Division 4).

That is, a benefit that is a loan benefit cannot be:

A property benefit by virtue of the exclusion contained within the definition of 'property benefit' at subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA.
A residual benefit by virtue of the exclusion contained within section 45 of the FBTAA.

In Westpac Banking Corporation v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 70 FCR 52; (1996) 34 ATR 143; 96 ATC 5021, the Court examined loans provided by the bank to its employees. The loans were at a concessional interest rate and the usual loan establishment fees charged to the public were generally waived.

The Court found that the benefits relating to the loan establishment service were not within the subject matter of Division 4 and more generally, that Division 4 was not an exclusive code for all benefits that in any way relate to loans.

Whilst all benefits that relate to a loan may not necessarily fall within Division 4, where a loan is provided on a commercial basis, the DRP benefits that specifically arise under the terms of the loan are considered to be within the subject matter of Division 4.

As such the DRP benefits that arise under terms of a limited recourse loan cannot also give rise to either property benefits or residual benefits.

Date of decision:  7 April 2003

Year of income:  Year ending 30 June 2003

Legislative References:
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986
   section 45
   subsection 136(1)
   Division 4 of Part III

Case References:
Westpac Banking Corporation v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation
   (1996) 70 FCR 52
   (1996) 34 ATR 143
   96 ATC 5021

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2003/316
ATO ID 2003/317

Keywords
Fringe benefits tax
Fringe benefits
Loan fringe benefits
Property fringe benefits
Residual fringe benefits

Siebel/TDMS Reference Number:  336077; 1-5T2LYTF; 1-C51B0WV

Business Line:  Private Groups and High Wealth Individuals

Date of publication:  16 May 2003
Date reviewed:  31 July 2017

ISSN: 1445-2782