ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2003/463

Income Tax

Capital Allowances: meaning of 'value of property' where a hire purchase agreement ends
FOI status: may be released

This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version.

  • This document has changed over time. View its history.

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Does the expression 'the value of the property at the end of the arrangement' in paragraph 240-78(c) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) mean the market value of the property at the end of the hire purchase agreement?

Decision

Yes. The expression 'the value of the property at the end of the arrangement' in paragraph 240-78(c) of the ITAA 1997 means the market value of the property at the end of the hire purchase agreement.

Facts

The taxpayer entered into an arrangement that was a hire purchase agreement with a finance provider, a Bank, for plant used by the taxpayer in carrying on a business for the purpose of producing assessable income.

The term of the hire purchase agreement was for 60 months. The hire purchase agreement was terminated early. The Bank repossessed the plant and advised the taxpayer of the amount outstanding under the hire purchase agreement. The taxpayer did not extend or renew the agreement nor reacquire the plant.

The taxpayer disputed the amount advised as outstanding. Under a negotiated settlement the taxpayer paid the Bank a settlement payment comprised of a payment and the return of the plant.

Reasons for decision

Division 240 of the ITAA 1997 deals with hire purchase agreements as defined in subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997. The broad scheme of the Division is to treat such hire purchase agreements as a sale of the relevant goods to the hirer (notional buyer) combined with a loan from the supplier (notional seller) to the notional buyer.

The taxpayer was the notional buyer and the Bank was the notional seller under the hire purchase agreement (section 240-17 of the ITAA 1997). The hire purchase agreement ended when the plant was repossessed (section 240-75 of the ITAA 1997).

Section 240-78 of the ITAA 1997 gives the meaning of termination amount as an amount payable because the hire purchase agreement ends.

Paragraph 240-78(c) of the ITAA 1997 provides that a termination amount includes the value of the property at the end of the hire purchase agreement. It is intended that the expression 'value of the property' means the market value of the property at the end of the hire purchase agreement. This covers situations where the property is returned to the notional seller as a form of payment towards the outstanding debt when the hire purchase agreement is terminated early.

This is consistent with subsection 240-90(3) of the ITAA 1997, which provides that in these circumstances (and where the hire purchase agreement has not been extended or renewed) both the notional buyer's sale consideration and the notional seller's cost of acquisition of the property are taken to be equal to the market value of the property at the end of the hire purchase agreement.

Accordingly, 'the value of the property at the end of the arrangement' in paragraph 240-78(c) of the ITAA 1997 means the market value of the property at the end of the hire purchase agreement

Date of decision:  11 June 2003

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 2001 Year ended 30 June 2000 Year ended 30 June 1999

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   section 240-17
   section 240-75
   section 240-78
   paragraph 240-78(c)
   subsection 240-90(3)
   subsection 995-1(1)

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2003/462
ATO ID 2003/464

Keywords
Capital Allowances CoE
Lease & hire expenses
Hire purchase

Business Line:  Effective Life & Capital Allowances Centre of Expertise

Date of publication:  20 June 2003

ISSN: 1445-2782

history
  Date: Version:
You are here 11 June 2003 Original statement
  27 January 2012 Archived