ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2003/463 (Withdrawn)
Income Tax
Capital Allowances: meaning of 'value of property' where a hire purchase agreement endsFOI status: may be released
-
This ATO Interpretative Decision is withdrawn because it contains a view in respect of a provision of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 that was repealed with effect from 1 July 2010.This document has changed over time. View its history.
This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:
If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.
Issue
Does the expression 'the value of the property at the end of the arrangement' in paragraph 240-78(c) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) mean the market value of the property at the end of the hire purchase agreement?
Decision
Yes. The expression 'the value of the property at the end of the arrangement' in paragraph 240-78(c) of the ITAA 1997 means the market value of the property at the end of the hire purchase agreement.
Facts
The taxpayer entered into an arrangement that was a hire purchase agreement with a finance provider, a Bank, for plant used by the taxpayer in carrying on a business for the purpose of producing assessable income.
The term of the hire purchase agreement was for 60 months. The hire purchase agreement was terminated early. The Bank repossessed the plant and advised the taxpayer of the amount outstanding under the hire purchase agreement. The taxpayer did not extend or renew the agreement nor reacquire the plant.
The taxpayer disputed the amount advised as outstanding. Under a negotiated settlement the taxpayer paid the Bank a settlement payment comprised of a payment and the return of the plant.
Reasons for decision
Division 240 of the ITAA 1997 deals with hire purchase agreements as defined in subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997. The broad scheme of the Division is to treat such hire purchase agreements as a sale of the relevant goods to the hirer (notional buyer) combined with a loan from the supplier (notional seller) to the notional buyer.
The taxpayer was the notional buyer and the Bank was the notional seller under the hire purchase agreement (section 240-17 of the ITAA 1997). The hire purchase agreement ended when the plant was repossessed (section 240-75 of the ITAA 1997).
Section 240-78 of the ITAA 1997 gives the meaning of termination amount as an amount payable because the hire purchase agreement ends.
Paragraph 240-78(c) of the ITAA 1997 provides that a termination amount includes the value of the property at the end of the hire purchase agreement. It is intended that the expression 'value of the property' means the market value of the property at the end of the hire purchase agreement. This covers situations where the property is returned to the notional seller as a form of payment towards the outstanding debt when the hire purchase agreement is terminated early.
This is consistent with subsection 240-90(3) of the ITAA 1997, which provides that in these circumstances (and where the hire purchase agreement has not been extended or renewed) both the notional buyer's sale consideration and the notional seller's cost of acquisition of the property are taken to be equal to the market value of the property at the end of the hire purchase agreement.
Accordingly, 'the value of the property at the end of the arrangement' in paragraph 240-78(c) of the ITAA 1997 means the market value of the property at the end of the hire purchase agreement
Date of decision: 11 June 2003Year of income: Year ended 30 June 2001 Year ended 30 June 2000 Year ended 30 June 1999
Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
section 240-17
section 240-75
section 240-78
paragraph 240-78(c)
subsection 240-90(3)
subsection 995-1(1)
ATO ID 2003/462
ATO ID 2003/464
Keywords
Capital Allowances CoE
Lease & hire expenses
Hire purchase
ISSN: 1445-2782
| Date: | Version: | |
| 11 June 2003 | Original statement | |
| You are here | 27 January 2012 | Archived |