ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2004/528

Fringe Benefits Tax

Car fringe benefits: base value of a car where the car has been previously leased by the employer
FOI status: may be released

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

If an employer provides the use of a car to an employee, where the car has been previously provided to the employee under an earlier lease agreement that involved a different lease company, will the base value of the car that is calculated under subsection 9(2) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA) be the cost price of the car to the second lessor?

Decision

No. The base value of the car, for the purpose of subsection 9(2) of the FBTAA, is determined by reference to the earliest time that the employer first held the car.

Facts

The employee entered into an effective salary sacrifice arrangement with his employer who provided him with a car through a novated lease agreement. At the end of the lease period the employee purchased the car from the lease company.

Shortly after, the employee entered into a second lease agreement with the employer involving the same car.

Under the second lease arrangement the employee sold the car to a new leasing company and is then provided with the same car through a novated lease agreement between the employer and that company.

The employer elects to use the statutory formula method to value any car fringe benefits for this car.

Reasons for Decision

Subsection 9(1) of the FBTAA sets out the formula for calculating the taxable value for one or more car fringe benefits for a particular car held by the employer, where the employer uses the statutory formula method. Under subsection 162(1) of the FBTAA a car is 'held' where it is owned, leased or otherwise made available to the employer by another person.

Where the car is leased by the employer, subparagraph 9(2)(a)(ii) of the FBTAA provides that the base value of the car is the 'leased car value of the car at the earliest holding time'. 'Leased car value' is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA to mean, where a car is 'held but not owned by a person', the cost price of the car to the lessor. 'Earliest holding time' is explained at paragraph 9(2)(b) of the FBTAA to be the earliest time before the current time when the car was held by the provider or an associate of the provider.

Therefore, the base value will be the cost price to the lessor under the first lease arrangement, being the earliest time that the car was held.

Date of decision:  22 June 2004

Year of income:  31 March 2005

Legislative References:
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986
   subsection 9(1)
   subsection 9(2)
   subsection 136(1)
   subsection 162(1)

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
2004/527
2003/584

Keywords
Car fringe benefits
FBT base value
FBT cost price
FBT leased car value
FBT statutory formula
Fringe benefits tax

Siebel/TDMS Reference Number:  3938179; 1-6BJC60Y; 1-DESS73Q

Business Line:  Private Groups and High Wealth Individuals

Date of publication:  25 June 2004
Date reviewed:  22 January 2018

ISSN: 1445-2782