ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2004/912
Income Tax
Portfolio transfer of general insurance liabilities: deduction for consideration paid in respect of indirect settlement costsFOI status: may be released
This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:
If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.
Issue
Can a general insurance company claim a deduction under section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) for the indirect claims settlement component of the consideration given to cede its outstanding claims liabilities under a portfolio transfer?
Decision
Yes. A general insurance company can claim a deduction under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 for the indirect claims settlement component of the consideration given to cede its outstanding claims liabilities under a portfolio transfer.
Facts
The taxpayer is a general insurance company for the purposes of section 995-1 of the ITAA 1997 and the Insurance Act 1973.
The taxpayer entered into a portfolio transfer arrangement whereby the whole of its insurance liabilities are to be transferred to another insurance company (the transferee). The taxpayer intends to cease its insurance operation after the portfolio transfer.
The portfolio transfer is completed in accordance with the provisions of the Insurance Act. The transferee is also an authorised general insurer under the Insurance Act.
Under the portfolio transfer, the taxpayer is required to give consideration to the transferee for assuming the outstanding claims liability under its general insurance policies as calculated for taxation purposes as well as a payment in respect of indirect claims settlement costs.
Indirect claims settlement costs are the general expenses of running and administering a general insurance company's claims department.
Reasons for Decision
Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 states that a loss or outgoing is deductible provided that it is 'necessarily incurred in carrying on a business for the purpose of gaining or producing your assessable income.' A loss or outgoing is not deductible under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 if it is denied under paragraph 8-1(2)(a) of the ITAA 1997 because it is a loss or outgoing of a capital nature.
The deductibility of the payment for indirect settlement costs can be determined in light of the High Court's decision in G.P. International Pipecoaters Pty Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1990) 170 CLR 124; 90 ATC 4413; (1990) 21 ATR 1 (Pipecoaters). In the Pipecoaters decision the court stated:
The character of expenditure is ordinarily determined by reference to the nature of the asset acquired or the liability discharged by the making of the expenditure, for the character of the advantage sought by the making of the expenditure is the chief, if not the critical, factor in determining the character of what is paid.
The character of a payment will 'take the quality of an outgoing of a capital nature or of an outgoing on account of revenue from the cause or the purpose of incurring the expenditure' (Dixon J in Hallstroms Pty Limited v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1946) 72 CLR 634 (1946) 8 ATD 190; (1946) 3 AITR 436).
Accordingly, the payment for indirect settlement costs takes on the character from the purpose for which the expenditure was incurred. The purpose of the expenditure is to allow the taxpayer to transfer its insurance related liabilities, which are on revenue account. This indicates that the expenditure is of a revenue nature.
The nature of a payment as a one off payment does not prejudice treatment as an outgoing on revenue account under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 (McTiernan J in Foley Bros Pty Ltd v. FC of T (1965) 13 ATD 474; (1965) 3 AITR 436).
Accordingly, the indirect claims settlement component of the consideration paid by the taxpayer to cede its outstanding claims liabilities under a portfolio transfer is deductible under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.
Date of decision: 1 November 2004Year of income: Year ended 31 December 2004
Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
section 8-1
paragraph 8-1(2)(a)
section 995-1
the Act
Case References:
G P International Pipecoaters Pty Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation
(1990) 170 CLR 124
90 ATC 4413
21 ATR 1
(1946) 72 CLR 634
(1946) 8 ATD 190 Foley Bros Pty Ltd v. FC of T
(1965) 13 ATD 474
(1965) 9 AITR 635 Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2004/910
ATO ID 2004/911
ATO ID 2004/913
ATO ID 2004/914
ATO ID 2004/915
ATO ID 2004/916
ATO ID 2004/917
ATO ID 2004/918
ATO ID 2004/919
ATO ID 2004/920
ATO ID 2004/921
ATO ID 2004/922
ATO ID 2004/923
ATO ID 2004/924
ATO ID 2004/925
ATO ID 2004/926
ATO ID 2004/927
ATO ID 2004/928
ATO ID 2004/929
ATO ID 2004/930
Keywords
General insurance
General insurance industry
ISSN: 1445-2782