Draft Taxation Ruling

TR 93/D19

Income tax: tax shortfall penalties: calculation of a tax shortfall and allocation of additional tax

• Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this draft ruling.
  This document has been finalised by TR 94/3.

FOI status:

draft only - for comment

Preamble

What this Ruling is about

1. This Ruling outlines the general basis on which additional tax should be calculated under sections 226G, 226H, 226J, 226K, 226L and 226M (the shortfall sections) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA).

Ruling

2. Additional tax under the shortfall sections is calculated in respect of a tax shortfall or part of a tax shortfall. While a tax shortfall is broadly the gross difference between the tax properly payable by a taxpayer and the tax that would have been payable by the taxpayer if it were assessed on the basis of the taxpayer's return, a tax shortfall will frequently need to be split into its component parts to determine the correct application of the shortfall sections.

3. The examples below illustrate the calculations to be followed in applying shortfall sections. The examples recognise that in the course of an audit a tax officer may detect a number of items that require adjustment, some of which may warrant penalty, some of which may not. In addition, there may be adjustments made in a taxpayer's favour which may or may not relate to the debit adjustments made. Further, the adjustments may be to income, deductions, rebates, foreign tax credits or offsets of franking deficit tax.

4. The basic rule is that if there is not a tax shortfall for a year then additional tax cannot be imposed. For example, if a taxpayer has omitted an amount of income, but the tax related to that matter is more than offset by an adjustment in the taxpayer's favour (whether or not related to the omitted income), no additional tax would be payable. Accordingly, the examples below only cover situations where, after the various adjustments to the taxpayer's assessment, there is a tax shortfall. Although all of the examples assume that the taxpayer was taxable to start with, the same principles for calculating penalty would apply where a taxpayer had originally returned a loss, provided there was in fact a tax shortfall after all adjustments had been made.

5. The examples below are assumed to be in respect of assessments for the 1992-93 year of income for a resident individual taxpayer. The principles illustrated apply equally to the calculation of penalty under the shortfall sections for other kinds of taxpayers.

Date of effect

6. This Ruling (that is, the final Taxation Ruling based on this Draft Taxation Ruling) sets out the current practice of the Australian Taxation Office and is not concerned with a change in interpretation. Consequently, it applies from the date on which the shortfall sections commenced to operate.

Examples

7. The examples below are based around combinations of the following income/rebate/credit adjustments:

NOTES:

•

"income misstatements" may be either understated income amounts or overstated deductions, or a combination of both;

•

"credits" for penalty purposes are foreign tax credits under Divisions 18, 18A and 18B of Part III of the ITAA, and offsets of franking deficit tax;

•

for the purpose of calculating tax shortfalls in the following examples, 1992-93 resident individual rates of tax have been used;

•

for the purpose of calculating interest in the following examples, the tax is assumed to have been avoided for a period of one year, and the rate of interest for the purpose of section 170AA of the ITAA is assumed to be 9.6% for that whole year.

Commissioner of Taxation
22 April 1993

References

ATO references:
NO 93/2071-7
BO

Subject References:
additional tax
calculation
self assessment
tax shortfall

Legislative References:
ITAA 170AA
ITAA 226G
ITAA 226H
ITAA 226J
ITAA 226K
ITAA 226L
ITAA 226M