Draft Taxation Determination

TD 2000/D20

Income tax: capital gains: can CGT event G3 in section 104-145 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 happen - allowing a shareholder to crystallise a capital loss on their shares in a company - if a liquidator declares that they expect to make a distribution during the winding-up of the company?

  • Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this draft ruling.
    This document has been finalised by TD 2000/52.

FOI status:

Draft only - for comment

Preamble

Draft Taxation Determinations (DTDs) present the preliminary, though considered, views of the Australian Taxation Office. DTDs should not be relied on; only final Taxation Determinations represent authoritative statements by the Australian Taxation Office.

1. No..

2. For CGT event G3 (about a liquidator declaring shares worthless) to happen, the liquidator of a company must declare that they have reasonable grounds to believe, at the time of the declaration, that there is no likelihood that shareholders in the company (or shareholders of the relevant class of shares) will receive any further distribution in the course of winding-up the company. This allows a shareholder to take the benefit of capital losses on their shares..

3. If the liquidator expects to make a distribution, no matter how small, they are not able to make a valid declaration in terms of subsection 104-145(1). So, a shareholder would not be able to crystallise a capital loss until a valid declaration is made or a CGT event (such as a cancellation) happens to the shares..

4. The fact that a winding-up distribution has been made does not preclude a later declaration by the liquidator in terms of subsection 104-145(1) if circumstances change such that the liquidator then believes that no further distribution is likely to be made to shareholders in the course of winding-up the company..

Example

5. On 25 May 2000, a liquidator declares that shareholders will not receive a distribution of more than 2.5% of their shareholding. The liquidator suggests that a loss of 97.5% of the shareholders' holding has crystallised during the year..

6. On 1 August 2000 the liquidator actually makes a distribution of 1.5% and has reasonable grounds to believe that there is no likelihood that any further distribution will be made. On 2 August 2000 the liquidator makes a declaration to that effect..

7. For the purposes of CGT Event G3 only the declaration on 2 August 2000, that there is no likelihood that any further distribution will be made, may crystallise a capital loss for shareholders. This loss can be used in the 2000-2001 income year. The declaration on 25 May 2000 that a future distribution will not exceed 2.5% does not enable shareholders to crystallise a loss of 97.5% of their share holdings in the 1999-2000 income year..

Note 1:

8. This draft Taxation Determination rewrites and, when it is finalised, will replace Taxation Determination TD 92/188..

Note 2:

9. The Explanatory Memorandum to Tax Law Improvement Bill (No. 1) 1998 explains at pages 40 and 41 that the expression ' further distribution' (emphasis added) was used in subsection 104-145(1) to clarify that a liquidator's declaration may be made after a distribution has been made during a winding-up of a company. In other words, the making of a winding-up distribution does not preclude a later declaration by a liquidator in terms of subsection 104-145(1)..

Your comments

10. We invite you to comment on this Draft Taxation Determination. We are allowing 4 weeks for comments before we finalise the Determination. If you want your comments considered, please provide them to us within this period..

Comments by Date: 20 October 2000
Contact officer details have been removed following publication of the final ruling.

Commissioner of Taxation
20 September 2000

References

ATO references:
NO

ISSN 1038 - 8982

Subject References:
capital gain
capital loss
company
declaration
distribution
liquidation
liquidator
liquidator's distribution
liquidator's declaration
share
shareholder
winding-up

Legislative References:
ITAA 1997 104-145
ITAA 1997 104-145(1)