Bankruptcy Act 1966
On a review of a decision, if the Inspector-General is satisfied that: (a) the ground or grounds on which the objection was made was not a ground or were not grounds specified in subsection 149D(1) ; or (b) there is insufficient evidence to support the existence of the ground or grounds of objection; or (c) the reasons given for objecting on that ground or those grounds do not justify the making of the objection; or (d) a previous objection that was made on that ground or those grounds, or on grounds that included that ground or those grounds, was cancelled;
the Inspector-General must cancel the objection.
149N(1A)
An objection must not be cancelled under subsection (1) if: (a) the objection specifies at least one special ground; and (b) there is sufficient evidence to support the existence of at least one special ground specified in the objection; and (c) the bankrupt fails to establish that the bankrupt had a reasonable excuse for the conduct or failure that constituted the special ground.
For this purpose, special ground means a ground specified in paragraph 149D(1)(ab) , (d), (da), (e), (f), (g), (h), (ha), (ia), (k) or (ma).
149N(1B)
In applying subsection (1A) , no notice is to be taken of any conduct of the bankrupt after the time when the ground concerned first commenced to exist.
149N(2)
The cancellation does not take effect until: (a) the end of the period within which an application may be made to the Administrative Review Tribunal for the review of the decision of the Inspector-General; or (b) if such an application is made - the decision of the Tribunal is given.
149N(3)
If the Inspector-General is not satisfied as mentioned in subsection (1) , the Inspector-General must confirm the decision.
This information is provided by CCH Australia Limited Link opens in new window. View the disclaimer and notice of copyright.