Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
SECTION 832-405 Hybrid requirement - assume payment was made to an investor 832-405(1)
The payment meets the hybrid requirement in this section if:
(a) the payment is made directly, or indirectly through one or more interposed entities, to a *reverse hybrid; and
(b) subsection (2) or (3) applies.
Payment would have been taxed in Australia
832-405(2)
This subsection applies if:
(a) the investor country identified in subsection 832-410(3) is Australia; and
(b) either:
(i) the amount of the *deduction/non-inclusion mismatch exceeds the amount that would be the amount of that mismatch if the amount of the payment that was *subject to Australian income tax for an income year was instead worked out on the assumption in subsection (4); or
(ii) on the assumption in subsection (4), the payment would have given rise to a *hybrid financial instrument mismatch, a *hybrid payer mismatch or a *reverse hybrid mismatch.
Payment would have been taxed in a foreign country
832-405(3)
This subsection applies if:
(a) the investor country identified in subsection 832-410(3) is a foreign country; and
(b) either:
(i) the amount of the *deduction/non-inclusion mismatch exceeds the amount that would be the amount of that mismatch if the amount of the payment that was *subject to foreign income tax for a *foreign tax period was instead worked out on the assumption in subsection (4); or
(ii) on the assumption in subsection (4), the payment would have given rise to a *hybrid financial instrument mismatch, a *hybrid payer mismatch or a *reverse hybrid mismatch.
Assumption - payment was made to the investing taxpayer
832-405(4)
For the purposes of subsections (2) and (3), assume that the payment had instead been made:
(a) by the same entity; but
(b) directly to the investing taxpayer identified in paragraph 832-410(3)(a) or (b).
This information is provided by CCH Australia Limited Link opens in new window. View the disclaimer and notice of copyright.