Tax Laws Amendment (Countering Tax Avoidance and Multinational Profit Shifting) Act 2013 (101 of 2013)
Schedule 2 Modernisation of transfer pricing rules
Part 1 Main amendments
Taxation Administration Act 1953
5 Section 284-160 in Schedule 1
Repeal the section, substitute:
284-160 Base penalty amount : schemes
(1) The base penalty amount for a *scheme to which subsection 284-145(1) applies is, subject to section 284-224:
(a) 50% of your *scheme shortfall amount; or
(b) 25% of your scheme shortfall amount if it is *reasonably arguable that the adjustment provision does not apply.
(2) The base penalty amount for a *scheme to which subsection 284-145(2A) applies is, subject to section 284-224:
(a) 25% of your *scheme shortfall amount; or
(b) 10% of your scheme shortfall amount if it is *reasonably arguable that the adjustment provision does not apply.
(3) The base penalty amount for a *scheme to which subsection 284-145(2B) applies is worked out using this table and section 284-224 if relevant:
Base penalty amount |
||
Item |
Column 1 In this situation: |
Column 2 The base penalty amount is: |
1 |
having regard to any relevant matters, it is reasonable to conclude that an entity that (alone or with others) entered into or carried out the *scheme, or part of it, did so with the sole or dominant purpose of that entity or another entity getting a *transfer pricing benefit from the scheme |
the sum of: (a) 50% of your *scheme shortfall amount, to the extent that it is not attributable as mentioned in paragraph (b); and (b) 25% of your scheme shortfall amount, to the extent (if any) that it is attributable to the entity, or the entity's agent, treating the adjustment provision as applying (including not applying) to a matter (or identical matters) in a particular way that is *reasonably arguable |
2 |
item 1 does not apply |
the sum of: (a) 25% of your *scheme shortfall amount, to the extent that it is not attributable as mentioned in paragraph (b); and (b) 10% of your scheme shortfall amount, to the extent (if any) that it is attributable to the entity, or the entity's agent, treating the adjustment provision as applying (including not applying) to a matter (or identical matters) in a particular way that is *reasonably arguable |
Note: For special rules about when transfer pricing treatment is not reasonably arguable, see Subdivision 284-E.