Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
section 90
Ha
&
Anor v. State Of New South Wales
&
Ors; Walter Hammond
&
Associates Pty Limited v. State Of New South Wales
&
Ors
97 ATC 4674
.
Ha
&
Anor v. State Of New South Wales
&
Ors; Walter Hammond
&
Associates Pty Limited v State Of New South Wales
&
Ors
97 ATC 4674
at page 4684 per Brennan CJ, McHugh, Gummow and Kirby JJ.
The term used in
Excise Act 1901
section 58
is
'entry for home consumption'
.
Criminal Code Act 1995
sections 11.1
,
11.2
and
11.5
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
section 995-1
for definition of
Relative for this purpose
Excise Act 1901
paragraph 39(2)(j)
Note that this is different to the consideration for granting a licence. In granting a licence we can take into account any misleading statement, or if you knowingly made a false statement, in your application. For suspension or cancellation we can consider any statement you make to us in relation to excise matters.
This does not mean movements within the bounds of your licensed premises, rather movements from licensed premises to another place.
While there is no specific provision in the Excise Act which allows permissions to be cancelled (unlike licences), in accordance with
subsection 33(3)
of the
Acts Interpretations Act 1901
the power to grant the permission provides the power to cancel the permission.
Excise Regulations 1925
subregulation 79(14)
This is normally a firm contracted by the duty free shop to 'pluck' the invoices. They are known as Duty Free Security.
Note the legislation uses the term 'delivered for home consumption' (see for example
sections 61
and
61C
).
See
R v. Lyons
(1906) 3 CLR 770;
Collector of Customs (NSW) v. Southern Shipping Co Ltd
(1962) 107 CLR 279;
Carmody v. F C Lovelock Pty Ltd
(1970)
123 CLR 1
.
Note the legislation uses the term 'delivered for home consumption' (see for example
sections 61
and
61C
).
See
R v. Lyons
(1906) 3 CLR 770;
Collector of Customs (NSW) v. Southern Shipping Co Ltd
(1962)
107 CLR 279
;
Carmody v. F C Lovelock Pty Ltd
(1970)
123 CLR 1
.
ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2004/61
Excise: goods given away without payment of excise duty.
ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2001/595
Excise: Liability to pay an amount equal to the excise duty on excisable goods stolen from the premises of a licensed excise manufacturer or a licensed storage place.
ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2004/50
Excisese: accounting for excisable goods for the purposes of
section 60
of the Excise Act 1901.
See our website at www.ato.gov.au for the latest version of the Schedule to the Excise Tariff Act.
Note the legislation uses the term 'delivered for home consumption' (see for example
sections 61
and 61C).
See
R v. Lyons
(1906)
3 CLR 770
;
Collector of Customs (NSW) v. Southern Shipping Co Ltd
(1962)
107 CLR 279
;
Carmody v. F C Lovelock Pty Ltd
(1970)
123 CLR 1
.
The term used in
Excise Act 1901
section 58
is 'entry for home consumption'.
The Macquarie Dictionary - Macquarie Multimedia Version 5.0.0
ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2005/226
Excisese: cancellation of periodic settlement permission.
The term used in
Excise Act 1901
section 58
is 'entry for home consumption'.
For example, a decision not to issue a movement permission under
Excise Act 1901
section 61A
.
Objections are governed by
Part IVC
of the
Taxation Administration Act 1953
(TAA).
These are conducted in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal or the Federal Court.
Excise Act 1901
section 129CB