Taxation Determination
TD 93/217
Income tax: Offshore Banking Units (OBU) - what is the effect of funding an offshore banking (OB) activity with both OB and non-OB money?
This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version. |
-
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.This document has changed over time. View its history.
FOI status:
may be releasedFOI number: I 1216529| This Determination, to the extent that it is capable of being a 'public ruling' in terms of Part IVAAA of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 , is a public ruling for the purposes of that Part. Taxation Ruling TR 92/1 explains when a Determination is a public ruling and how it is binding on the Commissioner. Unless otherwise stated, this Determination applies to years commencing both before and after its date of issue. However, this Determination does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Determination (see paragraphs 21 and 22 of Taxation Ruling TR 92/20). |
1. The profits resulting from funding an OB activity with both OB and non-OB money constitute OB money; that is, none of the money is non-OB money as defined in section 121C of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 . However, any profits must be apportioned between 'assessable OB income' and other assessable income.
2. Assessable OB income is defined in subsection 121EE(2) and is the total of the assessable income derived by the OBU from OB activities, or included in the assessable income because of such activities, other than income derived from the use of non-OB money. It is only this income which is taxed at the concessional rate. Income derived from non-OB money is taxed at the normal company rate. The profits from the OB activity, therefore, must be apportioned according to the proportion of OB and non-OB money used to generate the income. All of the profits, however, do constitute OB-money and may be used to generate concessionally taxed income from a subsequent OB activity.
3. The use of non-OB money, however, will be taken into consideration for purposes of the 'purity test' in section 121EH. Where more than 10% of the assessable income from OB activities is derived from non-OB money, concessional tax treatment will not apply to any of the income.
Example:
An OBU funds an OB activity with $40 000 of non-OB money and $60 000 of OB money. The activity generates income of $10 000 which will be taxed in the following manner:
$40 000 / $100 000 x $10 000 = $4 000 $4 000 taxed at 39%
$60 000 / $100 000 x $10 000 = $6 000 $6 000 taxed at 10%
The income of $10 000 is OB money and may be used in subsequent OB activities to generate OB income.
In this example, if the above activity represented all of the OBU's assessable income, it would fail the "purity test" and all of the assessable income would be taxable at normal company rates of tax.
Commissioner of Taxation
28/10/93
Previously issued as Draft TD 93/D216
References
ATO references:
NO NAT 93/3707-5
Subject References:
offshore banking,
OBUs,
non-OB money
Legislative References:
ITAA Pt III Div 9A
| Date: | Version: | Change: | |
| You are here | 28 October 1993 | Original ruling | |
| 13 October 2021 | Consolidated ruling | Addendum |