ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2003/21

Company tax

Group company loss transfers: companies wholly-owned by the same individuals
FOI status: may be released

This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version.

  • This document incorporates revisions made since original publication. View its history and amending notices, if applicable.

CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.

Issue

Does Subdivision 170-A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) enable a loss transfer agreement to be made between two companies that are both owned in equal proportions by the same two individuals?

Decision

No. The two companies are not members of the same 'wholly-owned group' as defined within Subdivision 975-W of the ITAA 1997. As a result, subsection 170-30(2) of the ITAA 1997 operates to deny these companies the ability to make a loss transfer agreement.

Facts

The shares of two Australian resident companies have been owned in equal proportions by two individuals since before 1 July 1998. One company (the 'loss company') made a tax loss in the 2002 income year while the other (the 'income company') made a taxable profit in the same year.

Reasons for Decision

The requirements to enable a tax loss to be transferred from a loss company to an income company include a requirement that both companies be members of the same wholly-owned group during the relevant period: subsection 170-30(2) of the ITAA 1997.

Section 975-500 of the ITAA 1997 defines 'wholly-owned group' as follows:

'Two companies are members of the same wholly-owned group if:

(a)
one of the companies is a 100 per cent subsidiary of the other company; or
(b)
each of the companies is a 100 per cent subsidiary of the same third company.'

As the shareholders of both the loss company and the income company are individuals, it follows that neither company can be a 100 per cent subsidiary of another company, and they cannot be members of the same 'wholly-owned group' as defined.

For that reason, the requirement of subsection 170-30(2) of the ITAA 1997 is not satisfied and no tax loss can be transferred from the loss company to the income company.

Date of decision:  12 November 2002

Year of income:  Year ended 30 June 2002

Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
   section 975-500.
   subsection 170-30(2).

Related ATO Interpretative Decisions
ATO ID 2003/18
ATO ID 2003/19
ATO ID 2003/22
ATO ID 2003/23

Keywords
Group company loss transfers
Company losses

Business Line:  Office of the Chief Tax Counsel

Date of publication:  14 February 2003

ISSN: 1445-2782

history
  Date: Version:
You are here 12 November 2002 Original statement
  15 January 2010 Archived