ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2006/235
Income Tax
Capital Allowances: capital works - construction expenditure - landscaping designFOI status: may be released
This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version. |
-
This document has changed over time. View its history.
This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:
If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.
Issue
Is the capital expenditure incurred by the taxpayer on a landscaping design 'construction expenditure' as defined in section 43-70 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?
Decision
No. The capital expenditure incurred by the taxpayer on a landscaping design is not 'construction expenditure' as defined in section 43-70 of the ITAA 1997 because the expenditure forms part of the expenditure on landscaping which is specifically excluded from 'construction expenditure'.
Facts
A severe storm damaged the garden of the taxpayer's rental property. The taxpayer incurred capital expenditure in engaging the services of a landscaping architect to re-design the rental property's garden. The landscaping architect provided the taxpayer with a landscaping design. The taxpayer subsequently carried out the landscaping works according to the landscaping design. Some of the landscaping works carried out were capital works to which Division 43 of the ITAA 1997 applied as they constituted more than earthworks that merely created artificial landscapes.
Reasons for Decision
A deduction under Division 43 of the ITAA 1997 for capital works is dependent, among other things, on whether there is construction expenditure for the capital works.
Construction expenditure is defined in subsection 43-70(1) of the ITAA 1997 as 'capital expenditure incurred in respect of the construction of capital works'.
Taxation Ruling TR 97/25 deals with the operation of Division 43 of the ITAA 1997 and provides at paragraph 9 that construction expenditure includes preliminary expenses such as architect fees, engineering fees, foundation excavation expenses and costs of building permits. These expenses are accepted as being 'in respect of' the construction of capital works.
Subsection 43-70(2) of the ITAA 1997 excludes certain expenditure from 'construction expenditure'. Expenditure on landscaping is so excluded (paragraph 43-70(2)(d)).
For expenditure to be incurred 'on' landscaping, there must be a sufficient connection and close association between the expenditure and the actual landscaping work. It is not limited to expenditure incurred directly on the actual landscaping, but does not extend to expenditure more remote in purpose (Robe River Mining Co Pty Ltd v. Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 21 FCR 1; 89 ATC 4606; (1989) 20 ATR 768; Pine Creek Goldfields Ltd v. FC of T 99 ATC 4382; (1999) 41 ATR 471; QCT Resources Limited v. FC of T 97 ATC 4432; (1997) 36 ATR 184; Taxation Ruling TR 2002/1).
The landscaping design was prepared specifically for the taxpayer's landscaping work, and the taxpayer carried out the landscaping according to the design. The landscaping design was an integral part of the taxpayer's landscaping works. There is a sufficient connection between the expenditure incurred on the landscaping design and the actual landscaping work. Therefore, the expenditure incurred on the landscaping design is part of the expenditure 'on' landscaping. It follows that the expenditure incurred on the landscaping design is not 'construction expenditure' as defined in section 43-70 of the ITAA 1997.
Amendment History
| Date of Amendment | Part | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 12 December 2014 | Reason for Decision | Remove reference to ITAA 1997 |
| Related Public Rulings | Include reference to Taxation Ruling TR 2002/1 |
Year of income: Year ended 30 June 2006
Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
Division 43
section 43-70
subsection 43-70(1)
subsection 43-70(2)
paragraph 43-70(2)(d)
Case References:
Robe River Mining Co Pty Ltd v. Commissioner of Taxation
(1989) 21 FCR 1
89 ATC 4606
(1989) 20 ATR 768
99 ATC 4382
(1999) 41 ATR 471 QCT Resources Limited v. FC of T
97 ATC 4432
(1997) 36 ATR 184
Related Public Rulings (including Determinations)
Taxation Ruling TR 97/25
Taxation Ruling TR 2002/1
ATO ID 2002/1098
Keywords
Capital expenditure
Construction costs
Landscaping expenses
ISSN: 1445-2782
| Date: | Version: | |
| 21 July 2006 | Original statement | |
| You are here | 12 December 2014 | Updated statement |
| 19 April 2018 | Updated statement |