Practice Statement Law Administration

PS LA 2017/2

Diverted profits tax assessments
  • This document has changed over time. View its history.

Contents  
1. What this Practice Statement is about
2. What you should do if you consider that the diverted profits tax may apply
3. What to do after a diverted profits tax assessment is made
4. The interaction between a diverted profits tax assessment and an income tax assessment for the same period
5. More information

This Practice Statement is an internal ATO document and an instruction to ATO staff.

This Practice Statement provides guidance to ATO staff on the administrative process of making a diverted profits tax assessment.

1. What this Practice Statement is about

This Practice Statement provides guidance to ATO staff on the administrative process for making a diverted profits tax (DPT) assessment under section 155-5 of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 through ATO-initiated action and the processes that follow after such an assessment is made.

This Practice Statement and the processes outlined in it have been developed in recognition of the seriousness of making a DPT assessment.

All legislative references in this Practice Statement are to Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953, unless otherwise indicated.

2. What you should do if you consider that the diverted profits tax may apply

If you consider that the DPT may apply, you may, in the first instance, present the relevant facts and circumstances to a DPT specialist in the International Support and Programs business line, who can assist you in deciding whether the matter should be referred to the Tax Counsel Network (TCN). Where you have decided to conduct a DPT analysis, you must engage TCN to work with you in undertaking such analysis.

Consideration of the diverted profits tax

With the assistance of TCN, you should engage with the taxpayer to obtain information and discuss issues as appropriate. In conjunction with TCN, you should then form a view as to whether the DPT applies based on the information available to you.

Where you form the view that the DPT applies, you must ensure that TCN's engagement is formalised in accordance with the usual procedures regarding the application of the rules in Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936.[1]

There are 3 steps which must be taken prior to making a DPT assessment (unless it is an exceptional case). You must:

obtain endorsement from the DPT Review Committee
seek advice from the General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) Panel at an initial hearing[2]
obtain Deputy Commissioner endorsement on the decision to make a DPT assessment.

Each of these 3 steps is discussed further in this Practice Statement.

Diverted profits tax Review Committee

If, after conducting a DPT analysis, you and TCN are of the view that the DPT applies, you must obtain endorsement from the DPT Review Committee to refer the matter to the GAAR Panel for consideration for an initial hearing.

The DPT Review Committee will consist of:

an Assistant Commissioner from your business line
the Assistant Commissioner of the DPT specialist team, and
a TCN officer.

Initial General Anti-Avoidance Rules Panel hearing

The GAAR Panel provides advice to decision-makers in order to ensure that decisions made on the application of the DPT are objectively based and there is a consistency in approach to the various issues that arise in relation to the application of the DPT.[3]

The GAAR Panel may consider any aspect of the application of the DPT.

However, the GAAR Panel may be practically limited to the extent to which it can advise on issues involving complex or extensive evidentiary material. These limitations will be dealt with by the GAAR Panel Chair on a case-by-case basis, in line with normal practice.

The GAAR Panel will ordinarily include at least one non-ATO member, in line with normal practice.

Consistent with the preliminary GAAR Panel process, the taxpayer (or a representative of the taxpayer) will not be invited to attend the initial GAAR Panel hearing.[4]

The GAAR Panel Chair can decide not to have a referred matter considered by the GAAR Panel. However, they would usually consult the GAAR Panel before making that decision.[5]

Deputy Commissioner endorsement

Based on advice from the GAAR Panel, you must, in consultation with TCN, decide whether to make a DPT assessment.

If you decide that you wish to make a DPT assessment contrary to the advice of the GAAR Panel, you must first escalate the matter to the GAAR Panel Chair or the Chief Tax Counsel (CTC), in accordance with usual procedure.[6]

The decision to make a DPT assessment is subject to endorsement by a Deputy Commissioner in your business line.

Once your Deputy Commissioner has provided endorsement, you must arrange for the notice of assessment to be issued to the taxpayer and also ensure that the liability is recorded on the appropriate system.

Streamlined process in exceptional cases

You and your Deputy Commissioner may consider that exceptional circumstances exist such that a DPT assessment should be made without requiring all or some of the steps in this Practice Statement. This may be the case where delay could frustrate the application of the DPT to a particular taxpayer or could result in a DPT assessment being unenforceable. For example, if there is a risk that a taxpayer will move assets offshore or liquidate an entity with the purpose of frustrating the DPT collection and recovery process, it may be necessary to act expeditiously.

A Deputy Commissioner will only authorise departure from the normal procedure after consultation with the GAAR Panel Chair or the CTC, in accordance with existing GAAR Panel practice.[7]

If you believe a streamlined process is appropriate in your case, you should speak to TCN in the first instance.

3. What to do after a diverted profits tax assessment is made

Recovering the tax payable to us

The DPT is due and payable 21 days after you have given the taxpayer the relevant DPT notice of assessment.[8]

You should refer the matter to Frontline Operations to instigate the commencement of debt collection procedures for any amounts that remain owing after the due date.

Issuing a diverted profits tax statement

You should issue a written statement outlining the basis upon which you have applied the DPT to the taxpayer no later than 7 days after you have given the taxpayer the relevant DPT notice of assessment.

Period of review of diverted profits tax assessments

The period of review for a DPT assessment is 12 months from the day after the day the notice of the DPT assessment is given to the taxpayer, unless shortened or extended.[9]

The period of review gives the taxpayer a further opportunity to provide information to you relevant to their DPT assessment.

If you have not already done so, you should consider whether it is appropriate to refer your case to an officer from Objections and Review (OAR), who may provide support on evidence and appeals processes, particularly if your case is likely to result in litigation.

General Anti-Avoidance Rules Panel

During the period of review, you must refer your matter to the GAAR Panel for further hearing.[10] This must be done whether or not you referred the matter to the GAAR Panel for an initial hearing before making the DPT assessment.

In accordance with normal GAAR Panel procedure, the taxpayer will usually be invited to attend the hearing and address the GAAR Panel. However, an invitation to attend the hearing may not be extended if the taxpayer has not cooperated and given us the requisite information.

In extending an invitation to the taxpayer, the GAAR Panel Chair will request that the taxpayer provide a written submission (unless the taxpayer chooses to rely upon a written submission already made to us).

Usually, the GAAR Panel hearing will take place towards the end of the 12-month review period when you have sufficiently considered all information provided by the taxpayer. You should contact the GAAR Panel Secretariat after issuing a DPT assessment to schedule a suitable time and notify the taxpayer accordingly.

Where a taxpayer notifies us of a shorter period of review that ends before the date of any scheduled GAAR Panel hearing for the matter, you must reschedule the GAAR Panel hearing unless it is not possible to do so.

Amending a diverted profits tax assessment

Based on the information available to you and any advice provided by the GAAR Panel, you must decide, in consultation with TCN, whether or not to amend the taxpayer's DPT assessment.[11]

If the matter is not able to be considered by the GAAR Panel because of a shortened period of review, you must seek advice from the GAAR Panel Chair prior to amending the DPT assessment.

If you decide that an amendment is appropriate, you have until the end of the period of review to amend the DPT assessment. You must obtain your Deputy Commissioner's approval before you amend a DPT assessment.

If you decide not to amend a DPT assessment, you should notify the taxpayer in writing of your decision. You must obtain your Deputy Commissioner's endorsement to issue this notification.

Extending the period of review

If you do not consider you can complete your examination of the taxpayer's circumstances within the period of review, you can seek an extension by:

requesting the taxpayer's consent to extend the period of review[12], or
applying to the Federal Court for an order to extend the period of review.[13]

You must seek the extension before the period of review has ended.

Refer your case to an OAR officer for assistance in applying for the order.

Shortened period of review

A taxpayer can shorten the period of review for a DPT assessment by giving us written notice specifying a shorter period.[14] The shorter period must end at least 30 days after the day on which the written notice is given to us.[15]

If you are given such a notice and you have not yet completed your review of the taxpayer's DPT assessment, you must consider, in consultation with TCN, whether to apply to the Federal Court for an order to maintain the full period of review.

The Federal Court will only grant such an order if it is satisfied that it was not reasonably practicable or it was inappropriate for you to complete the examination within the shorter period specified in the taxpayer's notice because of:

any action taken by the taxpayer, or
any failure by the taxpayer to take reasonable action.[16]

You must apply for the order within 30 days of receiving written notice from the taxpayer.[17]

You should, as a matter of priority, refer your case to an OAR officer for assistance in applying for the order.

Objection and appeal rights

A taxpayer cannot object to a DPT assessment.[18]

After the period of review has ended, a taxpayer may appeal a DPT assessment to the Federal Court.[19] An appeal must be lodged with the Federal Court within 60 days after the end of the period of review.[20]

Special rules apply regarding what evidence is admissible in a Federal Court appeal in relation to a DPT assessment. For further guidance, refer to paragraphs 1.195 to 1.202 of the revised Explanatory Memorandum to the Treasury Laws Amendment (Combating Multinational Tax Avoidance) Bill 2017.

4. The interaction between a diverted profits tax assessment and an income tax assessment for the same period

DPT is a separate tax liability to income tax. A taxpayer may have a DPT assessment and an income tax assessment in respect of the same period. These assessments are not 'alternative assessments' as described in section 1 of Law Administration Practice Statement PS LA 2006/7 Alternative assessments.

Before issuing a DPT assessment and during the period of review, you should monitor the progress of any related income tax assessment and, specifically, whether the taxpayer has exercised any review or objection rights in respect of that assessment. If there is a review or objection on foot, coordinate with the relevant case officer to ensure there is a mutual understanding of the taxpayer's overall tax position.

5. More information

For more information, see:

PS LA 2005/24
Revised Explanatory Memorandum to the Treasury Laws Amendment (Combating Multinational Tax Avoidance) Bill 2017.

Amendment history

7 November 2024
Part Comment
Throughout Content checked for technical accuracy and currency.

Updated in line with current ATO style and accessibility requirements.

Date of Issue: 18 December 2017

Date of Effect: 18 December 2017

Paragraphs 14 to 17 of Law Administration Practice Statement PS LA 2005/24 Application of General Anti-Avoidance Rules.

Paragraph 28 of PS LA 2005/24.

Paragraph 24 of PS LA 2005/24.

Paragraph 31 of PS LA 2005/24. Relevantly, paragraph 33 of PS LA 2005/24 makes it clear that the GAAR Panel process does not provide a platform for a hearing as part of a quasi-judicial process of review.

Paragraph 23 of PS LA 2005/24.

Paragraph 26 of PS LA 2005/24.

Paragraph 26 of PS LA 2005/24.

Subsection 177P(3) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936.

Section 145-15.

Subject to the GAAR Panel Chair's discretion: see paragraph 23 of PS LA 2005/24.

If you wish to amend a DPT assessment contrary to the advice of the GAAR Panel, you must first escalate the matter to the Chair of the GAAR Panel or the CTC, in accordance with usual procedure.

Subsection 155-35(4).

Subsection 155-35(3).

Paragraph 145-15(1)(b).

Paragraph 145-15(2)(b).

Subsection 145-15(3).

Paragraph 145-15(3)(c).

Subsection 145-20(1).

Paragraph 145-20(4)(b).

Paragraph 145-20(4)(c).

File 1-AN371U0; 1-14DAI645

Related Practice Statements:
PS 2005/24
PS 2006/7

Other References:
Revised Explanatory Memorandum to the Treasury Laws Amendment (Combating Multinational Tax Avoidance) Bill 2017

Legislative References:
ITAA 1936 Pt IVA
ITAA 1936 177P(3)
TAA 1953 Sch 1
TAA 1953 Sch 1 145-15
TAA 1953 Sch 1 145-15(1)(b)
TAA 1953 Sch 1 145-15(2)(b)
TAA 1953 Sch 1 145-15(3)
TAA 1953 Sch 1 145-15(3)(c)
TAA 1953 Sch 1 145-20(1)
TAA 1953 Sch 1 145-20(4)(b)
TAA 1953 Sch 1 145-20(4)(c)
TAA 1953 Sch 1 155-5
TAA 1953 Sch 1 155-35(3)
TAA 1953 Sch 1 155-35(4)

Business Line:  ISP

ISSN: 2651-9526

PS LA 2017/2 history
  Date: Version:
  18 December 2017 Original statement
You are here 7 November 2024 Updated statement