ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2004/685
Income Tax
Company tax losses: choice to deduct tax loss must not create excess franking offsetsFOI status: may be released
This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:
If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.
Issue
Where a corporate tax entity has a tax loss, can the entity choose to deduct an amount of that tax loss under section 36-17 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) that would give rise to an amount of excess franking offsets?
Decision
No. Paragraph 36-17(5)(b) of the ITAA 1997 provides that a corporate tax entity that, disregarding the tax loss, would not have an amount of excess franking offsets for an income year, must not choose to deduct an amount of tax loss that would result in the entity having an amount of excess franking offsets for that income year.
Facts
Company A incurred a tax loss of $20,000 for the 2002-03 income year.
For the 2003-04 income year, Company A derives total assessable income of $30,000, including franked distribution of $14,000, franking credit of $6,000 and other assessable income of $10,000. Company A does not derive any net exempt income and has no allowable deductions.
Company A seeks to deduct this tax loss of $20,000 for the 2003-04 income year.
Reasons for Decision
Subsection 36-17(2) of the ITAA 1997 provides a corporate tax entity with a choice as to the undeducted amount of tax loss (if any) to be deducted.
If the entity has net exempt income, subsection 36-17(3) of the ITAA 1997 provides that the entity has a choice as to the undeducted amount of tax loss (if any) to be deducted after firstly deducting the tax loss from the net exempt income.
Subsection 36-17(5) of the ITAA 1997 further provides:
36-17(5) The choice that the entity has under subsection (2) or (3) for the later income year is subject to both of the following:
Paragraph 36-17(5)(a) of the ITAA 1997 does not apply to Company A for the 2003-04 income year, as Company A would not have an amount of excess franking offsets under section 36-55 of the ITAA 1997 if the tax loss of $20,000 was disregarded.
If Company A chooses to deduct the full amount of the tax loss of $20,000, it would have an amount of excess franking offsets of $3,000, calculated under section 36-55 of the ITAA 1997 as follows:
$6,000 - (($30,000-$20,000) x 30%).
Company A therefore cannot choose to deduct the full amount of tax loss because of paragraph 36-17(5)(b) of the ITAA 1997.
Alternatively if Company A chooses to deduct $10,000 of the tax loss, it would not have an amount of excess franking offsets under section 36-55 of the ITAA 1997:
$6,000- (($30,000-$10,000) x 30%) = $nil.
In accordance with paragraph 36-17(5)(b) of the ITAA 1997, Company A can choose to deduct $10,000 of the tax loss for the 2003-04 income year.
Date of decision: 11 August 2004Year of income: Year ended 30 June 2004
Legislative References:
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
section 36-17
subsection 36-17(5)
paragraph 36-17(5)(a)
paragraph 36-17(5)(b)
section 36-55
Keywords
Carry forward losses
Tax loss
ISSN: 1445-2782