Australian Tax Treaties
The Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (the MLI) has modified the application of this tax treaty. A synthesised text of the MLI and this tax treaty is available to facilitate the understanding of how the MLI modifies this tax treaty.
In the case of a partnership or similar entity which has its place of effective management in Australia and which is treated in Australia as fiscally transparent:
(a) a partner who is a resident of Australia and whose share of the income, profits or gains of the partnership is taxed in Australia in all respects as though such amounts had been derived by the partner directly, shall be entitled to the benefits of this Convention with respect to their share of such amounts arising in France as though the partner had derived such amounts directly;
(b) a partner who is a resident of France :
(i) shall be entitled to the benefits of this Convention with respect to their share of such income, profits or gains of the partnership arising in Australia as though the partner had derived such amounts directly; and
(ii) shall be taxable in respect of their share of such income, profits or gains of the partnership arising in France as though the partner had derived such amounts directly but any such amounts which are taxed in Australia shall be treated for the purpose of paragraph 2 of Article 23 of this Convention as arising from sources in Australia.
2.
In the case of a partnership which has its place of effective management in a State other than a Contracting State and which is treated in that third State as fiscally transparent, a partner who is a resident of a Contracting State and whose share of the income, profits or gains of the partnership is taxed in that Contracting State in all respects as though those amounts had been derived directly by the partner, shall be entitled to the benefits of this Convention with respect to their share of such amounts arising in the other Contracting State as though the partner had derived such amounts directly, subject to the following conditions:
(a) the absence of contrary provisions in a taxation convention between a Contracting State and the third State; and
(b) the partner ' s share of the income, profits or gains of the partnership is taxed in the same manner, including the nature or source of those amounts and the time when those amounts are taxed, as would have been the case if the amounts had been derived directly; and
(c) it is possible to exchange information concerning the partnership or partners under the terms of a taxation convention between the Contracting State in which the income, profits or gains arise and the third State.
3.
For the purposes of paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, income, profits or gains shall be deemed to arise in a Contracting State in particular where they are attributable to a permanent establishment which the partnership or entity has in that State.
4.
Where, under any provision of this Convention, a partnership or other group of persons which is a resident of France in accordance with paragraph 5 of Article 4 , is entitled to relief from tax in Australia on any income, profits or gains, that provision shall not be construed as restricting the right of Australia to tax any member of the partnership or other group who is a resident of Australia on their share of such amounts; but any such amounts shall be treated for the purposes of paragraph 1 of Article 23 of this Convention as arising from sources in France.
This information is provided by CCH Australia Limited Link opens in new window. View the disclaimer and notice of copyright.