Training Guarantee Determination
TGD 93/5
Training guarantee: if an employer incurs eligible training expenditure in excess of their minimum training requirement in a particular year, can it be offset against the following year's training obligation?
-
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised consolidated version of this ruling and amending notices.This document has been Withdrawn.View the Withdrawal notice for this document.
FOI status:
may be releasedFOI number: I 12142281. No. Net eligible training expenditure of an employer under subsection 24(1) of the Training Guarantee (Administration) Act 1990 (the TGAA), is the total eligible training expenditure incurred by the employer within the financial year ending 30 June, less total training subsidies and reimbursements received during the same year. Eligible training expenditure incurred in one financial year can not be carried forward to meet training guarantee requirements of the next financial year.
2. The only exception is capital expenditure on plant and equipment acquired solely or principally for use in eligible training. Subsection 26(2) of the TGAA allows employers the option of claiming the whole of the expenditure in the year in which it was incurred; or spreading the eligible training expenditure over the expected useful life of the equipment. This will be an amount equivalent to that which can be claimed as an income tax deduction under the depreciation provisions contained in subsection 54(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act, 1936.
Examples:
MC Pty Ltd, a computer software manufacturer, incurs $350 on an eligible training program for three new staff to improve their computer awareness skills. The training is conducted in October 1992. The cost of $350 will form part of MC Pty Ltd's total eligible training expenditure for the 1992/93 year.
The same day MC Pty Ltd spends $1400 on an overhead projector, purchased solely or principally for use in their specially designated training room. MC Pty Ltd have the option in this situation to either treat the full amount of $1400 as eligible training expenditure in the 1992/93 year, or alternatively, spread the eligible training expenditure over the expected useful life of the overhead projector (ie, expected useful life estimated to be 7 years, therefore $1400/7 = $200 per year).
Commissioner of Taxation
25/2/93
References
ATO references:
NO ALB/TG/TGR 2
Subject References:
capital expenditure
eligible training expenditure
minimum training requirement
Legislative References:
TGAA 24 &
25