Draft Goods and Services Tax Determination
GSTD 2011/D4
Goods and services tax: What is 'hospital treatment' for the purposes of section 38-20 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999?
-
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this draft ruling.This document has been finalised by GSTD 2012/4.
Preamble
This publication is a draft for public comment. It represents the Commissioner's preliminary view about the way the law applies. It is not a public ruling or advice for the purposes of section 105-60 of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953. You can rely on this publication to provide you with protection from interest and penalties as follows. If a statement in this publication is later found to be incorrect or misleading and you make a mistake as a result of relying on this publication, you will not have to pay a penalty. In addition, if you have relied on this publication reasonably and in good faith you will not have to pay interest charges. However, you will still have to pay the correct amount of tax, provided the time limits under the law allow it. |
Ruling
1. Hospital treatment, for the purposes of section 38-20 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) has the same meaning as in the Private Health Insurance Act 2007 (PHI Act).
2. Hospital treatment is treatment (including the provision of goods and services) that:
- (a)
- is intended to manage a disease, injury or condition; and
- (b)
- is provided to a person:
- (i)
- by a person who is authorised by a hospital to provide the treatment; or
- (ii)
- under the management or control of such a person; and
- (c)
- either:
- (i)
- is provided at a hospital; or
- (ii)
- is provided, or arranged, with the direct involvement of a hospital.[1]
All of these requirements must be met for the treatment to be hospital treatment.
3. Hospital treatment also includes any other treatment, or treatment included in a class of treatments, specified in the Private Health Insurance (Health Insurance Business) Rules.[2]
4. Hospital treatment does not include treatment, or treatment included in a class of treatments, specified in the Private Health Insurance (Health Insurance Business) Rules for the purposes of subsection 121-5(4) of the PHI Act.
5. A supply of hospital treatment is GST-free except to the extent that subsection 38-20(2) of the GST Act applies.[3]
Meaning of 'treatment'
6. Without limiting the meaning of hospital treatment, 'treatment' includes a reference to any of, or any combination of, accommodation, nursing, medical, surgical, podiatric surgical, diagnostic, therapeutic, prosthetic, pharmacological, pathology or other services or goods intended to manage a disease, injury or condition.[4]
Meaning of 'accommodation'
7. 'Accommodation' is not defined in the PHI Act. As it does not have a special or technical meaning, it takes its ordinary meaning. The Macquarie Dictionary[5] relevantly defines 'accommodation' to mean:
1. the act of accommodating. 6. Lodging, or food and lodging.
The term 'accommodate' is relevantly defined by The Macquarie Dictionary[6] to mean:
2. to provide with room and sometimes with food and entertainment.
8. In the context of hospital treatment, accommodation is the provision of a room or lodging in connection with hospital treatment and can include meals provided to the patient by the hospital. The provision of accommodation can include access to a television or telephone (including making telephone calls).[7] Where the fee for accommodation includes access to these items, the access to the items forms part of the GST-free supply of hospital treatment.
9. However, where access to a television and telephone (including making telephone calls) is supplied to the patient for an additional fee, these items are supplied separately to the supply of hospital treatment. The supply of access to a television or telephone (including making telephone calls) is not GST-free under subsection 38-20(3) of the GST Act as the supply of accessing these items is not a supply of goods.[8]
Meaning of 'provided to a person'
10. The requirement that the hospital treatment be provided to a person is only satisfied where the treatment is supplied to the patient.
11. A supply made under a multi-party arrangement where one entity supplies to a second entity the service of providing treatment to the individual patient is not a supply of hospital treatment as the recipient of the supply is not the individual patient.[9]
Meaning of 'by a person who is authorised by a hospital to provide treatment or under the management or control of such a person'
12. A hospital is a facility that is declared to be a public or private hospital under subsection 121-5(5) of the PHI Act.
13. The person providing the treatment must either be authorised by a hospital to provide the treatment or under the management and control of such a person.
Meaning of 'provided at a hospital; or is provided, or arranged, with the direct involvement of a hospital'
14. The requirement that the treatment be provided at a hospital or is provided, or arranged, with the direct involvement of a hospital allows the treatment to be provided either within a hospital or outside the physical boundary of a hospital where the treatment is provided, or arranged, with the direct involvement of a hospital.
Date of effect
15. It is proposed that the final Determination when issued will apply from 26 March 2009. This is because the definition of hospital treatment set out in section 195-1 of the GST Act was amended to refer to the PHI Act with effect from that date.
16. The views expressed in this draft Determination were expressed in Issue 3.a, Issue 3.c.1, and Issue 3.c.2 of the Health Industry Partnership Issues Register.[10] For tax periods before 1 July 2010, where an entity relied on the views expressed in Issues 3.a, 3.c.1 or Issue 3.c.2 of the Health Industry Partnership Issues Register and to the extent that those views conflict with the views expressed in the final Determination, the entity is protected so that any underpaid net amount ceases to be payable or any amount overpaid by the Commissioner is taken to have been payable.[11]
17. The Determination will not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Determination (see paragraphs 75 to 77 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10).
Issue 3.c.2 of the Health Industry Partnership Issues Register
18. Issue 3.c.2 of the Health Industry Partnership Issues Register implies that access to a telephone (including making telephone calls) cannot fall within a supply of hospital treatment. However, as referred to at paragraphs 8 and 9 of this draft Determination, the provision of accommodation can include access to a telephone (including making telephone calls) where not supplied for an additional fee.
19. To the extent that an entity treated access to a telephone (including making telephone calls) as a taxable supply where an additional fee was not charged, they may be entitled to a refund providing that they are within time to claim the refund[12] and not precluded by other restrictions on refunds.[13]
Commissioner of Taxation
14 December 2011
Appendix 1 - Explanation
![]() |
Appendix 1 - Examples
Example 1
20. A doctor is employed by a hospital and authorised to provide treatment to patients. The doctor, as part of a course of treatment for a patient, instructs a nurse to provide certain components of that treatment. The components of the treatment provided by the nurse to the patient are considered to be under the management or control of the doctor, being a person who is authorised by the hospital to provide treatment. The treatment is provided to the patient at the hospital. Therefore, the components of the treatment provided by the nurse form part of the hospital treatment supplied to the patient.
Example 2
21. Further to Example 1, the patient arranges for a physiotherapist to attend the hospital to provide them with additional treatment. This supply is independent of the supply by the hospital. Whilst the physiotherapist may rely on information from the treating doctor in order to provide the additional treatment, the physiotherapist is not under the management or control of the doctor, being the person who is authorised by the hospital to provide treatment. Therefore, the supply by the physiotherapist to the patient is not part of the supply of hospital treatment made to the patient. However, the supply of physiotherapy services may be GST-free to the patient under section 38-10 of the GST Act.
Example 3
22. In contrast to Example 2, the hospital contracts with a physiotherapist to attend the hospital and provide physiotherapy services to the patient. The supply made by the physiotherapist to the hospital is not a supply of hospital treatment as the treatment needs to be supplied to the patient in order to satisfy the definition of hospital treatment. The fact that the supply made to the hospital results in the patient being provided treatment (that is, the physiotherapy service) is not sufficient to characterise the supply made to the hospital as hospital treatment. The physiotherapy service forms part of the supply of hospital treatment that the hospital makes to the patient. This is because the service forms part of the treatment supplied to the patient at the hospital and the hospital authorised the physiotherapist to provide the treatment.
Example 4
23. A patient has hospital treatment for a medical condition requiring a stay in hospital. Later, the patient is transferred to their own home under 'a hospital in the home' program to continue their treatment. The patient is still an inpatient of the hospital and remains under the care of the treating doctor in the hospital. The treatment provided to the patient in their own home is hospital treatment as the treatment is provided, or arranged, with the direct involvement of a hospital. This is so even though it is provided outside the physical boundary of the hospital.
Appendix 2 - Explanation
![]() |
Legislative overview
24. A supply of 'hospital treatment' is GST-free under subsection 38-20(1) of the GST Act. However, subsection 38-20(2) provides that a supply of hospital treatment is not GST-free to the extent that it relates to a supply of a professional service that is not GST-free because of subsection 38-7(2) of the GST Act.[14]
25. 'Hospital treatment' is defined in section 195-1 of the GST Act as having the same meaning as in the PHI Act. Section 121-5 of the PHI Act defines 'hospital treatment' as treatment (including the provision of goods and services) that:
- (a)
- is intended to manage a disease, injury or condition; and
- (b)
- is provided to a person:
- (i)
- by a person who is authorised by a hospital to provide the treatment; or
- (ii)
- under the management or control of such a person; and
- (c)
- either:
- (i)
- is provided at a hospital; or
- (ii)
- is provided, or arranged, with the direct involvement of a hospital.
26. Subsections 121-5(2) and 121-5(4) of the PHI Act respectively provide that certain other treatments or classes of treatment specified in the Private Health Insurance (Health Insurance Business) Rules are included or excluded as hospital treatment.
27. The Private Health Insurance (Health Insurance Business) Rules are amended from time to time and direct reference should be made to them.
28. A supply of goods is GST-free under subsection 38-20(3) if it is a supply that is directly related to a supply of hospital treatment that is GST-free under subsection 38-20(1) and is supplied by, or on behalf of, the supplier of the hospital treatment.
Meaning of 'provided to a person'
29. The definition of hospital treatment requires that the treatment be provided to a person.
30. The Commissioner's view is that the term 'provided to a person' in the context of the PHI Act is a reference to the treatment being supplied to a patient. In the context of the GST Act, the Commissioner considers that a supply of something can be made to one entity and be provided to a separate entity.[15] This view recognises the use of the words 'made' and 'provided' in the GST Act. In contrast, the PHI Act does not use terms that suggest the treatment provided to a person can arise from a supply of the treatment being made to a separate entity.[16]
31. Accordingly, only supplies of treatment made to an individual patient can fall within the definition of hospital treatment.
32. A supply made under a multi-party arrangement where one entity supplies to a second entity the service of providing treatment to the individual patient is not a supply of hospital treatment as the recipient of the supply is not the individual patient.[17]
Meaning of 'by a person who is authorised by a hospital to provide treatment or under the management or control of such a person'
33. A hospital is a facility that is declared to be a public or private hospital under subsection 121-5(5) of the PHI Act.
34. The person providing the treatment must either be authorised by a hospital to provide the treatment or under the management and control of such a person. A person under the management or control of the authorised person will often be in an employment or contractual relationship with the hospital.
35. The GST treatment of other services supplied by health practitioners to patients, which are separate supplies to those supplied by the hospital, needs to be determined in accordance with any other applicable provisions in the GST Act.[18]
Appendix 3 - Your comments
36. You are invited to comment on this draft Determination and the date of effect including the proposed transitional arrangements. Please forward your comments to the contact officer by the due date.
37. A compendium of comments is also prepared for the consideration of the relevant Rulings Panel or relevant tax officers. An edited version (names and identifying information removed) of the compendium of comments will also be prepared to:
- •
- provide responses to persons providing comments; and
- •
- publish on the Australian Taxation Office website at www.ato.gov.au
Please advise if you do not want your comments included in the edited version of the compendium.
Due date: | 3 February 2012 |
Contact officer details have been removed following publication of the final determination. |
Footnotes
Subsection 121-5(1) of the PHI Act.
Subsection 121-5(2) of the PHI Act.
See paragraph 24 of this draft Determination.
Subsection 121-5(3) of the PHI Act.
[Multimedia], version 5.0.0, 1/10/11.
[Multimedia], version 5.0.0, 1/10/11.
This view differs to that set out in Issue 3.c.2 of the Health Industry Partnership Issues Register which implies that the use of a telephone cannot fall within a supply of hospital treatment. Also see paragraphs 18 to 19 of this draft Determination.
This view is consistent with paragraph 5.16 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the A New Tax System (Goods and Services) Tax Act 1999.
See paragraphs 155 to 156 of Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2006/9 Goods and services tax: supplies.
Issues 3.a, 3.c.1 and 3.c.2 of the Health Industry Partnership Issues Register ceased to be public rulings from 1 July 2010. Before that date, they were public indirect tax rulings under former section 105-60 of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (TAA).
This protection was provided under former section 105-60 of Schedule 1 to the TAA, which was repealed with effect from 1 July 2010.
Under section 105-55 of Schedule 1 to the TAA refund claims must be within 4 years after the end of the relevant tax period or the entity notifies the Commissioner of their claim to a refund within that time period.
Section 105-65 of Schedule 1 to the TAA provides for restriction on GST refunds in certain circumstances.
Subsection 38-7(2) of the GST Act provides that a supply of a medical service is not GST-free under subsection 38-7(1) if:
- (a)
- it is a supply of a professional service rendered in prescribed circumstances within the meaning of regulation 14 of the Health Insurance Regulations made under the Health Insurance Act 1973 (other than the prescribed circumstances set out in regulations 14(2)(ea), (f) and (g)); or
- (b)
- it is rendered for cosmetic reasons and it is not a professional service for which a Medicare benefit is payable under Part II of the Health Insurance Act 1973.
See paragraphs 130 to 134 of GSTR 2006/9.
Cross v Certain Lloyds Underwriters [2011] NSWCA 136 at 29 to 36 and 68 to 72.
See paragraphs 155 to 156 of GSTR 2006/9.
For example see sections 38-7, 38-10, 38-45, 38-47 and 38-50 of the GST Act.
Not previously issued as a draft
References
ATO references:
NO 1-3BV0D4N
Related Rulings/Determinations:
GSTR 2006/9
TR 2006/10
Subject References:
goods and services tax
GST free
hospital treatment
Legislative References:
ANTS(GST)A 1999 38-7
ANTS(GST)A 1999 38-7(1)
ANTS(GST)A 1999 38-7(2)
ANTS(GST)A 1999 38-10
ANTS(GST)A 1999 38-20
ANTS(GST)A 1999 38-20(1)
ANTS(GST)A 1999 38-20(2)
ANTS(GST)A 1999 38-20(3)
ANTS(GST)A 1999 38-45
ANTS(GST)A 1999 38-47
ANTS(GST)A 1999 38-50
ANTS(GST)A 1999 195-1
Health Insurance Act 1973 Part II
Health Insurance Regulations 1975 14
Health Insurance Regulations 1975 14(2)(ea)
Health Insurance Regulations 1975 14(2)(f)
Health Insurance Regulations 1975 14(2)(g)
Private Health Insurance Act 2007
Private Health Insurance Act 2007 121-5
Private Health Insurance Act 2007 121-5(1)
Private Health Insurance Act 2007 121-5(2)
Private Health Insurance Act 2007 121-5(3)
Private Health Insurance Act 2007 121-5(4)
Private Health Insurance Act 2007 121-5(5)
TAA 1953 Sch 1 105-55
TAA 1953 Sch 1 105-60
TAA 1953 Sch 1 105-65
Case References:
Cross v Certain Lloyds Underwriters
[2011] NSWCA 136
Other References:
Health Industry Partnership Issues Register Issues 3.a, 3.c.1, and 3.c.2
Explanatory Memorandum to the A New Tax System (Goods and Services) Tax Act 1999
Private Health Insurance (Health Insurance Business) Rules
The Macquarie Dictionary, [Multimedia], version 5.0.0, 1/10/01