Taxation Ruling

TR 2009/6

Income tax: entitlement to foreign income tax offsets under section 770-10 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 where income is derived from investing in fiscally transparent foreign entities

This version is no longer current. Please follow this link to view the current version.

• Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.
  There is a Compendium for this document: TR 2009/6EC .
  This ruling contains references to repealed provisions, some of which may have been re-enacted or remade. The ruling has effect in relation to the re-enacted or remade provisions. Paragraph 32 in TR 2006/10 provides further guidance on the status and binding effect of public rulings where the law has been repealed or repealed and rewritten.
  Australia's tax treaties and other agreements except for the Taipei Agreement are set out in the Australian Treaty Series. The citation for each is in a note to the applicable defined term in sections 3AAA or 3AAB of the International Tax Agreements Act 1953.
  This document has changed over time. View its history.

Preamble

What this Ruling is about

1. This Ruling is concerned with the application of Division 770 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)^[1] (foreign income tax offsets) in circumstances where an Australian resident taxpayer invests in a fiscally transparent foreign entity. In particular, this Ruling deals with:

•

the entitlement of a resident taxpayer to claim a foreign income tax offset (often referred to as a 'FITO') under section 770-10 for foreign income tax imposed on the income of a fiscally transparent foreign entity in which the taxpayer holds an interest, depending on whether Division 830 applies to the foreign entity;

•

the entitlement of a resident taxpayer to claim a foreign income tax offset for foreign income tax imposed on the notional income of a foreign investment fund (FIF) or the notional assessable income of a controlled foreign company (CFC) where the resident taxpayer invests indirectly in the FIF or CFC through a foreign hybrid which is treated as an interest in a partnership pursuant to Division 830; and

•

whether the entitlement to claim a foreign income tax offset under section 770-10 in the circumstances outlined above will be affected by the operation of Australia's tax treaties.

2. This Ruling applies to taxpayers who have an interest in a fiscally transparent foreign entity as defined at paragraphs 5 and 6 of this Ruling.

3. This Ruling does not deal with taxpayers in relation to their:

•

income which is non-assessable non-exempt (NANE) income pursuant to section 23AH of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936); or

•

income which is NANE income pursuant to section 23AJ of the ITAA 1936.

Definitions

Australian income tax law

4. Australian income tax law means the ITAA 1936, the ITAA 1997, Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (TAA) and Part IVC of the TAA to the extent that it relates to the aforementioned Acts.

Fiscally transparent foreign entity

5. A foreign entity is fiscally transparent if no foreign income tax is imposed on its income, either by effect of application of the laws of a foreign country or because of an election, but rather tax is imposed on such income at the level of the partner or member.

6. For the purposes of this Ruling an interest in a fiscally transparent foreign entity means:

•

an interest in a foreign hybrid; or

•

an interest in an entity which would be treated as a foreign hybrid but for the fact that it does not satisfy paragraph 830-10(1)(e) (if the entity is a limited partnership) or paragraph 830-15(1)(d) of the ITAA 1997 (if the entity is a company) and no election has been made to treat the interest as an interest in a foreign hybrid under section 485AA of the ITAA 1936.

Foreign hybrid

7. A foreign hybrid is an entity that is either a foreign hybrid limited partnership or a foreign hybrid company for the purposes of Division 830.

Foreign hybrid company

8. A foreign hybrid company means a company formed in a foreign country that satisfies the requirements in subsection 830-15(1). An interest in a foreign hybrid company also includes an interest in a FIF held by a taxpayer who makes an election under section 485AA of the ITAA 1936.

Foreign hybrid limited partnership

9. A foreign hybrid limited partnership means a limited partnership formed in a foreign country that satisfies the requirements in subsection 830-10(1). An interest in a foreign hybrid limited partnership also includes an interest in a FIF held by a taxpayer who makes an election under section 485AA of the ITAA 1936.

Foreign income tax

10. Foreign income tax means taxes imposed under a foreign law in accordance with section 770-15.

Ruling

Foreign income tax imposed on a taxpayer's share of income of a foreign hybrid

The resident taxpayer pays the foreign income tax - offset allowed

11. A resident taxpayer whose assessable income includes, under section 92 of the ITAA 1936, a share of the net income of a foreign hybrid is entitled to a foreign income tax offset under subsection 770-10(1) of the ITAA 1997 for foreign income tax the taxpayer paid under the law of a foreign country in respect of that income.

The foreign hybrid, or some other entity, pays the foreign income tax - offset allowed

12. If, rather than the resident taxpayer, the foreign hybrid or some other entity pays foreign income tax in respect of that income (being income included under section 92 of the ITAA 1936) under the law of a foreign country, the resident taxpayer is treated (under section 770-130 of the ITAA 1997) as if it had paid the foreign income tax for Australian income tax law purposes. Accordingly, the resident taxpayer is entitled to a foreign income tax offset under subsection 770-10(1) for that foreign income tax paid. (See explanation at paragraphs 65 to 76 of this Ruling.)

Foreign income tax imposed on a taxpayer's share of income of a fiscally transparent foreign entity that is not a foreign hybrid

Foreign income tax paid on dividends and distributions from the foreign entity - offset allowed

13. A resident taxpayer that has an interest in a fiscally transparent foreign entity that is not a foreign hybrid is entitled to a foreign income tax offset under subsections 770-10(1) or 770-10(2) for foreign income tax imposed on a dividend or distribution from the foreign entity. This entitlement is only to the extent that the foreign income tax is paid in respect of so much of that dividend or distribution as is either:

•

included in the taxpayer's assessable income; or

•

NANE income of the taxpayer under section 23AK of the ITAA 1936.

(See explanation at paragraphs 80 to 86 of this Ruling.)

Attributable FIF income from the foreign entity - no offset allowed

14. A resident taxpayer that has an interest in an entity of that kind, and has not made an election to treat the interest as a foreign hybrid under section 485AA of the ITAA 1936, therefore continues to have an interest in a FIF and includes an amount in its assessable income under section 529 of the ITAA 1936. In these circumstances it is not entitled to a foreign income tax offset in respect of that amount. (See explanation at paragraphs 87 to 96 of this Ruling.)

Foreign income tax imposed on amounts included in the notional income of a CFC or a FIF in which a foreign hybrid has an interest

CFCs and FIF companies - no offset allowed

15. A resident taxpayer may have an interest in a foreign hybrid that, in turn, has an interest in a CFC or a foreign company FIF. In these cases, the resident taxpayer is not entitled to a foreign income tax offset for foreign income tax paid by the CFC or FIF in respect of amounts included in the CFC's notional assessable income or the FIF's notional income.

16. This is because, under Division 830, a foreign hybrid is not a company for Australian tax purposes. Only an attributable taxpayer that is a company can satisfy paragraph 770-135(2)(a). Therefore, the resident taxpayer cannot be treated as having paid the foreign income tax. (See explanation at paragraphs 97 to 105 of this Ruling.)

FIF trusts - offset allowed because hybrid is taken to have paid the foreign income tax

17. A resident taxpayer may have an interest in a foreign hybrid that, in turn, holds an interest in a foreign trust FIF. In this case, by contrast, the foreign hybrid is taken to have paid any foreign income tax paid by the foreign trust FIF in respect of an amount included in the FIF's notional income. This is because paragraph 770-135(2)(b) allows the section to apply to any entity with an interest in a foreign trust FIF.

18. Therefore, if all the additional conditions in section 770-135 are met the resident taxpayer is, in turn, entitled to a foreign income tax offset under subsection 770-10(1). This is because the taxpayer is taken under section 770-130 to have paid the foreign income tax that the hybrid is taken to have paid under section 770-135.

19. The offset is allowed to the extent that the foreign income tax is paid in respect of the taxpayer's share, under section 92 of the ITAA 1936, of so much of the foreign hybrid's net income as represents FIF income attributed to the foreign hybrid under section 529 of the ITAA 1936. (See explanation at paragraphs 106 to 112 of this Ruling.)

CFCs and FIFs - distributions to a foreign hybrid

20. Paragraphs 20 to 22 of this Ruling apply to a resident taxpayer that has an interest in a foreign hybrid that, in turn, has an interest in a CFC or a FIF.

21. If foreign income tax is imposed on distributions the CFC or FIF makes to the foreign hybrid, then the resident taxpayer is entitled to a foreign income tax offset.

22. The offset is allowed to the extent that the foreign income tax is paid in respect of the taxpayer's share of so much of the foreign hybrid's net income as represents the distribution, where the taxpayer's share is either assessable income or NANE income under sections 23AI or 23AK of the ITAA 1936. (See explanation at paragraphs 113 to 121 of this Ruling.)

The impact of Australia's tax treaties on the availability of foreign income tax offsets

23. Paragraphs 23 to 26 of this Ruling apply in the case of foreign tax being paid in countries with which Australia has a tax treaty.

24. A difference in treatment of income as between the State of source and Australia may arise because of differences between the countries' respective domestic tax laws. For example, the foreign entity may be treated as fiscally transparent under the law of the other State but as a company taxed in its own right under Australian tax law (that is, if it is not a foreign hybrid under Division 830).

25. In these cases, provided that the other State has taxed such income in accordance with the tax treaty, as interpreted and applied by it as the State of source, such tax is foreign income tax for the purposes of section 770-15. A foreign income tax offset may therefore be available under section 770-10.

26. However, if the foreign country imposes income tax in a manner other than in accordance with the tax treaty, relief under Australian income tax law from this category of double taxation (that is under Division 770) is only available to the extent consistent with the treaty. Accordingly, relief from this particular category of double taxation may only be obtained by seeking a refund of the foreign income tax from the foreign country. (See explanation at paragraphs 122 to 128 of this Ruling.)

Limit on the amount of the offset

27. If, in the above cases, a taxpayer is entitled to a foreign income tax offset, the amount of the foreign income tax offset is subject to the foreign income tax offset limit calculated in accordance with sections 770-75 and 770-80.

Examples

Example 1 - limited liability company a foreign hybrid

28. YZ LLC (YZ), a limited liability company formed in a foreign country that meets the requirements of subsection 830-15(1), derives $100,000 income from real property investments during the 2008-09 income year and incurs expenses of $20,000 in earning that income. A.B. See (AB), an Australian resident individual, is a shareholder in YZ with a membership interest of 50%.

29. Under the laws of YZ's country of residence, YZ is taxed as a partnership and is required to withhold tax of 30% from net real property income to which foreign resident shareholders are entitled, whether or not such income is distributed. YZ withholds and remits $12,000 of foreign income tax in respect of AB's share of the net real property investment income.

30. Under Division 830, YZ is treated as a partnership for Australian income tax law purposes. Therefore, for the 2008-09 income year, AB is treated as a partner in YZ and his assessable income will include his share of the net income of YZ.

31. AB is potentially subject to double taxation, as the amount in respect of which the foreign income tax has been paid is included in his assessable income. AB is taken to have paid that foreign income tax under section 770-130 and will be entitled to a foreign income tax offset for the 2008-09 income year for the $12,000 foreign income tax withheld by YZ, subject to AB's foreign income tax offset limit calculated under section 770-75.^[2]

Example 2 - limited liability company not a foreign hybrid

32. Assume the same facts as in Example 1, except that AB's membership interest in YZ is 10% and the remaining 90% interests are held by unrelated foreign residents. YZ therefore does not meet the requirements of paragraph 830-10(1)(e). In addition AB has not elected to treat his interest in YZ as an interest in a foreign hybrid under section 485AA of the ITAA 1936.

33. YZ withholds and remits $2,400 of foreign income tax in respect of AB's share of the net real property investment income (30% x (10% x $80,000)).

34. YZ is treated as a company for Australian income tax law purposes.^[3] YZ does not pay any dividends to AB during the income year.

35. As YZ has not paid a dividend to AB in the 2008-09 income year, AB's assessable income for that year does not include an amount in respect of which foreign income tax has been paid. Therefore AB is not entitled to a foreign income tax offset during the 2008-09 income year.

Example 3 - distribution by limited liability company that is not a foreign hybrid

36. Assume the same facts as in Example 2. In the following year, that is the 2009-10 income year, YZ distributes AB's share of the net rental income to AB.

37. AB receives a dividend for the purposes of section 44 of the ITAA 1936. AB's assessable income for the 2009-10 income year therefore includes $8,000 (the amount of the dividend grossed up to include the foreign income tax withheld).

38. The distribution was paid to AB during the 2009-10 income year out of income in respect of which YZ withheld foreign income tax during the 2008-09 income year. Therefore, the foreign income tax in the 2008-09 income year is taken to have been paid by AB in respect of the amount included in his assessable income in the 2009-10 income year. Accordingly, AB is entitled to claim a foreign income tax offset in that income year for the $2,400 tax withheld by YZ, subject to AB's foreign income tax offset limit for that year calculated under section 770-75.

Example 4- distribution by limited liability company that is not a foreign hybrid (because no section 485AA of the ITAA 1936 election was made)

39. Assume the same facts as in Examples 2 and 3, except that no FIF exemption provision applies in relation to AB's interest in YZ. Accordingly AB's FIF interest gives rise to an amount of $8,000 being included in his assessable income under section 529 of the ITAA 1936 for the 2008-09 income year (worked out under the calculation method). Also, assume that the distribution of $5,600 that is received by AB in the 2009-10 income year is treated as NANE income under section 23AK of the ITAA 1936.

40. For the 2008-09 income year, AB is not entitled to a foreign income tax offset for the foreign income tax withheld of $2,400 on his share of YZ's net real property investment income (as section 770-135 does not apply).^[4]

41. However, for the 2009-10 income year, AB is entitled to a foreign income tax offset of $2,400 pursuant to subsection 770-10(2) of the ITAA 1997 for the foreign income tax withheld (in the 2008-09 income year) from the dividend payment of $5,600 made to AB. Although AB did not directly pay the foreign income tax withheld from the dividend payment made to it, it is taken, by virtue of section 770-130 of the ITAA 1997, to have paid the relevant tax in respect of its NANE income under section 23AK of the ITAA 1936.^[5]

Example 5 - foreign hybrid invests in foreign company

42. Oz Co Pty Ltd, an Australian resident company, has a 50% interest in Alien LLP (Alien), a foreign hybrid limited partnership formed in Foreign Country 1. Alien in turn wholly owns For Co, a company that is resident in Foreign Country 2. For Co is a Controlled Foreign Company (CFC) for Australian tax purposes.

43. During the income year, For Co pays income tax under the laws of Foreign Country 2.

44. As Alien is treated as a partnership for Australian income tax law purposes, Oz Co's assessable income will include its share of the net income of Alien, calculated as if Alien was an Australian resident.

45. As For Co is a CFC and Alien is an attributable taxpayer by virtue of it being an Australian partnership for the purposes of Part X of the ITAA 1936, Alien's net partnership income includes attributed income under section 456 of the ITAA 1936. In calculating For Co's attributable income a notional allowable deduction is allowed for the foreign income tax paid. However, the foreign income tax paid by For Co does not count towards Oz Co's foreign income tax offset for the relevant income year, as Oz Co is not treated, pursuant to section 770-135 of the ITAA 1997, as having paid the foreign income tax for the purposes of subsection 770-10(1) of the ITAA 1997.

Example 6 - foreign hybrid receives dividend from foreign company

46. Assume the same facts as in Example 5, except that in the following income year For Co pays a dividend to Alien. Foreign Country 2 imposes withholding tax on the dividend.

47. As Alien is treated as a partnership for Australian income tax law purposes, Oz Co's assessable income would normally include its share of the net income of Alien, including the dividend payment from For Co. However, as a result of the earlier attribution of income from For Co to Alien (in Example 5) and the individual interest of Oz Co in the partnership net income of Alien, an attribution account credit exists for For Co in relation to Oz Co.

48. The share of the net income of Alien that would otherwise be included in Oz Co's assessable income will therefore be NANE income pursuant to section 23AI of the ITAA 1936 to the extent of the attribution account debit. Although Oz Co did not directly pay the foreign income tax withheld from the dividend payment made from For Co to Alien, it is taken, by virtue of section 770-130 of the ITAA 1997, to have paid the relevant tax in respect of the NANE income under section 23AI of the ITAA 1936. Oz Co will therefore be entitled to a foreign income tax offset pursuant to subsection 770-10(2) for the foreign income tax withheld from the dividend payment to the extent that the tax has been paid in respect of Oz Co's NANE income.

Example 7 - Application of a tax treaty

49. Hank LP (Hank) is a limited partnership formed in the United States. Fozzie Pty Ltd is an Australian resident company with a membership interest in Hank of 10% (with the remaining 90% interests being held by unrelated foreign residents). Hank does not meet the requirements of paragraph 830-10(1)(e) of the ITAA 1997, and Fozzie Pty Ltd has not made an election under section 485AA of the ITAA 1936 to treat its interest in Hank as an interest in a foreign hybrid.

50. During the 2008-09 income year, Hank derives $1,000,000 of interest income.

51. Under United States income tax law, tax of 10% is withheld in respect of the interest income to which foreign resident partners are entitled.

52. During the same income year, Fozzie Pty Ltd receives its 10% share of the distribution from Hank, which is $100,000 less the $10,000 tax withheld, that is $90,000.

53. Hank is treated as a company for Australian income tax law purposes. Therefore, for the 2008-09 income year, pursuant to sections 94L and/or 94M of the ITAA 1936, the $100,000 distribution to Fozzie Pty Ltd will be treated as a dividend (grossed-up to include the tax withheld). Accordingly, Fozzie Pty Ltd's assessable income will include the amount distributed or credited to it as a dividend.

54. As per the circumstances of Example 3 above, Fozzie Pty Ltd will be entitled to a foreign income tax offset in the income year in which its assessable income includes the amount treated as a dividend paid by Hank. However, the availability of a foreign income tax offset may also be subject to the USA Convention contained in Schedule 2 of the International Tax Agreements Act 1953 (the Agreements Act).

55. Article 22(2) of the USA Convention provides a general principle that where US tax has been paid in respect of US source income under the law of the US and in accordance with the USA Convention, a credit against Australian tax payable on that income will be allowed subject to the provisions and limitations of the law of Australia in force at the relevant time.

56. As Hank is treated as fiscally transparent under US tax law, the treaty benefits are applied at the level of the partner and not the limited partnership by the US for the purposes of applying the USA Convention.

57. As the income that flows through Hank to Fozzie Pty Ltd retains its character in the hands of Fozzie Pty Ltd for the purposes of US tax law, the extent to which the US exercises its source country taxing right under the Convention will be determined in accordance with Article 11 of the Convention, which deals with interest income. This is the case notwithstanding Fozzie Pty Ltd is taken to have received a dividend for the purposes of Australian income tax law.

58. As the US has taxed the income in accordance with the maximum rate allowable in respect of interest income under the Convention, Australia is obliged under the Convention to provide credit relief in respect of such tax, subject to the provisions and limitations of the law of Australia in force at the relevant time. This relief is provided in accordance with the provisions for the granting of a foreign income tax offset.

Date of effect

59. This Ruling applies to years of income commencing on or after 1 July 2008. However, this Ruling will not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of this Ruling (see paragraphs 75 and 76 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10).

Commissioner of Taxation
30 September 2009

Appendix 1 - Explanation

Introduction

60. Division 830 was introduced to enable certain entities formed outside Australia (called foreign hybrids) that are treated as fiscally transparent for the purposes of foreign income tax (but as companies for Australian income tax law purposes) to be treated as partnerships under Australian income tax law.^[6]

61. Division 830 can apply to a fiscally transparent foreign entity in one of two ways:

•

automatically where all of the requirements of subsection 830-10(1) (for a foreign hybrid limited partnership) or subsection 830-15(1) (for a foreign hybrid company) are satisfied; or

•

by election where the requirements of paragraphs 830-10(1)(a) to 830-10(1)(d) (for a foreign hybrid limited partnership) or paragraphs 830-15(1)(a) to 830-15(1)(c) (for a foreign hybrid company) are met, and the taxpayer makes an election under section 485AA of the ITAA 1936.

62. The effect of an election under section 485AA of the ITAA 1936 is that the fiscally transparent foreign entity is a foreign hybrid only for the purpose of applying the Australian income tax law to that taxpayer's interest in the entity. This election also prevents the FIF rules in Part XI of the ITAA 1936 from applying to the taxpayer's interest in the entity.

63. Where Division 830 applies in relation to a taxpayer's interest in a foreign hybrid, the Australian income tax law applies as if the foreign hybrid was a partnership, and the taxpayer was a partner in the partnership.^[7]

64. Where Division 830 does not apply, the fiscally transparent foreign entity continues to be treated as a company for the purpose of Australian income tax law.^[8]

65. Subsection 770-10(1) provides that a taxpayer is entitled to a foreign income tax offset for foreign income tax paid in respect of an amount that is included in their assessable income in a year of income.^[9]

66. To be entitled to an offset under subsection 770-10(1), a taxpayer must have:

•

included an amount in their assessable income for that income year; and

•

paid foreign income tax (as defined by subsection 770-15(1)) in respect of that amount.

67. Where foreign income tax has effectively been paid on the taxpayer's behalf, section 770-130 may treat the taxpayer, for the purposes of the ITAA 1997, as having paid the foreign income tax: for example, where foreign income tax has been withheld by the payer from a payment made to the taxpayer.

68. Section 770-130 requires that:

•

the foreign income tax was paid in respect of an amount included in the taxpayer's ordinary or statutory income; and

•

the foreign income tax has been paid under an arrangement with the taxpayer or under the law relating to the foreign income tax.

69. Both sections 770-10 and 770-130 use the phrase 'in respect of' to link the foreign income tax with an amount included in the taxpayer's ordinary or statutory income. The meaning of the phrase 'in respect of' has been considered by the Courts in a number of contexts.

70. It is well settled by the Courts that the phrase 'in respect of' denotes a relationship or connection between two things: State Government Insurance Office (Qld) v. Rees & Anor (Liquidators of KD Morris & Sons Pty Ltd) (1979) 144 CLR 549. The Courts have also considered that the meaning of the phrase, although wide, must be determined by the context within which the words are used: State Government Insurance Office (Qld) v. Rees & Anor at CLR 553-554 and 560-561, Technical Products Pty Ltd v. State Government Insurance Office (Qld) (1989) 167 CLR 45 at 47, 51 and 54, Construction Industry Long Service Leave Board v. Irving (1997) 74 FCR 587 at 595 and Commissioner of Taxation v. Scully (2000) 201 CLR 148 at 171; 2000 ATC 4111 at 4121; (2000) 43 ATR 718 at 729.

71. Applying the principles expressed in these cases, the phrase 'in respect of' should be construed within the context of Division 770, the intent of which can be found in the Object contained in section 770-5 and at paragraph 1.30 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment (2007 Measures No. 4) Bill 2007 (the 2007 EM), which provides:

1.30 Pursuant to Australia's tax laws, resident taxpayers may be assessed on both their foreign and domestic sourced income. To prevent the double taxation of worldwide income that has been taxed in another country, resident taxpayers will be entitled to a non-refundable tax offset for foreign income tax paid on an amount included in their assessable income (a 'double-taxed amount') [ Schedule 1, item 1, subsections 770 - 5(1 ) and ( 2 )]. This tax offset will extend to foreign residents where certain requirements are satisfied.

72. Within this context, it can be said that the phrase 'in respect of' is intended to draw a nexus between foreign income tax paid and an amount included in a taxpayer's assessable income, where the imposition of such foreign income tax would, apart from the application of Division 770, result in the taxpayer being exposed to double taxation in respect of that income.

Foreign income tax imposed on taxpayer's share of income of a fiscally transparent foreign entity

73. The key feature of a fiscally transparent foreign entity is that foreign income tax is not imposed on the income of that entity but rather on the partners or members. Such foreign income tax may be imposed by differing means, including directly on the partners by assessment, or indirectly by a payer withholding from the partner's share of the income of the fiscally transparent foreign entity. An Australian resident taxpayer with an interest in such an entity will therefore be exposed to foreign income tax in respect of their investment in the foreign entity.

74. The availability and timing of foreign income tax offsets depends on the treatment of the taxpayer's interest in the fiscally transparent foreign entity for Australian tax law purposes.

Fiscally transparent foreign entity treated as a foreign hybrid

75. Where a resident taxpayer has an interest in a fiscally transparent foreign entity, foreign income tax is imposed at the level of the partner or member under the law of the foreign country. Where that foreign entity qualifies as a foreign hybrid, it is treated as a partnership for the purposes of Australian income tax law. A resident taxpayer with an interest in a foreign hybrid is therefore treated as a partner in a partnership under Australian income tax law and is subject to tax in relation to their share of the net income of the foreign hybrid, thereby ensuring alignment of tax treatment of the relevant income under the laws of both countries.

76. In these situations, as both the foreign and Australian income tax are levied at the level of the partner or member, the core rules in Division 770 and, in particular, subsection 770-10(1) should apply in a straightforward manner to work out the foreign income tax paid (or taken to be paid) in respect of the amount included in the taxpayer's assessable income.

Fiscally transparent foreign entity not treated as a foreign hybrid (as it is not a CFC)

77. Where a fiscally transparent foreign entity is not treated as a foreign hybrid because it does not satisfy the CFC requirement^[10] at paragraph 830-10(1)(e) (if the entity is a corporate limited partnership) or paragraph 830-15(1)(d) of the ITAA 1997 (if the entity is a company) and the taxpayer does not make an election under section 485AA of the ITAA 1936, the foreign income tax offset implications for the resident taxpayer with an interest in such an entity are less straightforward.

78. As the fiscally transparent foreign entity is treated as a company for Australian tax purposes, any distribution the taxpayer receives (or is taken to receive under sections 94L or 94M of the ITAA 1936) from it is characterised as a dividend. Also, the taxpayer is treated as having an interest in a FIF which may result in income accruing to the taxpayer under section 529 of the ITAA 1936.^[11]

79. In these circumstances, it is necessary to consider whether, for the purposes of subsection 770-10(1), the foreign income tax imposed on the taxpayer's share of the net income of the fiscally transparent foreign entity has been paid in respect of an amount included in the taxpayer's assessable income.

Taxpayer's assessable income includes dividend or deemed dividend payment

80. Where the taxpayer receives a distribution from the fiscally transparent foreign entity and foreign income tax has been imposed on the taxpayer's share of the profits, there will be a relevant connection between the foreign income tax paid and the distributed amount (characterised as a dividend and included in the taxpayer's assessable income under Australian tax law).

81. That connection exists because the foreign income tax is levied at the level of the partner or member on their share of the entity's net income, rather than on the profits of the fiscally transparent foreign entity. Accordingly, to the extent that a distribution made to the resident taxpayer is included in their assessable income as a dividend, it is considered that the relevant portion of foreign income tax is paid (or taken to have been paid) by the taxpayer in respect of the distributed amount: see discussion at paragraphs 70 and 71 of this Ruling.

82. Where the taxpayer does not pay the foreign income tax directly but rather an obligation is imposed on the fiscally transparent entity or another entity to withhold foreign income tax on the taxpayer's share of the net income of the fiscally transparent entity, it is accepted that such tax is paid in a representative capacity for the taxpayer. As such, the taxpayer is taken to have paid the relevant foreign income tax for the purposes of determining their entitlement to the foreign income tax offset under Division 770: see discussion in relation to section 770-130 at paragraphs 67 and 68 of this Ruling and paragraph 1.99 of the 2007 EM.

83. This result is consistent with the legislative intent expressed in the 2007 EM which outlines the necessary link between foreign income tax paid by someone else and amounts included in a taxpayer's assessable income, particularly in the situation where a taxpayer has not elected foreign hybrid treatment. Paragraph 1.103 of the 2007 EM states:

Even where the Australian resident has not elected for the US limited liability company to be a foreign hybrid, the Australian resident will be entitled to a tax offset for the US withholding tax imposed on the distribution of the profits of the limited liability company. The tax offset will be in respect of the gross amount (pre-US tax) paid to the Australian resident. This is irrespective of the fact that the amount is regarded as a 'dividend' under Australian tax law and a 'distribution of partnership profits' under US law.

84. The use of the phrase 'in respect of an amount (a taxed amount) that is all or part of an amount included in your ordinary income or statutory income...' (emphasis added) in subsection 770-10(1) indicates that an apportionment should be made of the amount of foreign income tax paid to reflect the amount actually included in the taxpayer's assessable income.^[12] Accordingly, where the taxpayer receives a dividend, or a distribution deemed to be a dividend under sections 94L or 94M of the ITAA 1936 from the fiscally transparent foreign entity, but the dividend does not represent all of the partner's share of the income of the foreign entity in respect of which foreign income tax has been paid, the taxpayer will only be entitled to a foreign income tax offset to the extent that the foreign income tax has been paid in respect of that dividend income.

85. If in an income year the taxpayer is not taken, for the purposes of Australian income tax, to have received a dividend from the fiscally transparent foreign entity, the taxpayer's assessable income will not include any dividend income from the entity. Subsection 770-10(1) requires an amount to be included in the taxpayer's assessable income and that foreign income tax has been paid in respect of that income. Although foreign income tax may have been paid in a particular income year, if the income in respect of which that tax is paid is not included in the taxpayer's assessable income then the taxpayer is not entitled to claim a foreign income tax offset in that income year. By corollary, the taxpayer will be entitled to a foreign income tax offset in the year of income in which the taxpayer's assessable income includes the amount in respect of which foreign income tax has been paid, even though the foreign income tax may have been paid in an earlier income year.^[13] Thus, where a taxpayer receives a dividend from a fiscally transparent foreign entity (that is not a foreign hybrid) which is included in their assessable income in a later year to the year of income during which the foreign income tax was paid on the amount, the entitlement to a foreign income tax offset will arise in the later year.

86. Where, under the law of the foreign country, tax is imposed on a withholding basis on the amount of the distribution or deemed distribution, the amount included in the taxpayer's assessable income will be grossed up by the amount of any foreign income tax withheld by the payer. This is because, as noted in the 2007 EM, the foreign income tax constitutes income according to ordinary concepts pursuant to general tax law principles.^[14] Further, this income is derived in the relevant year of income by the taxpayer when it is applied or dealt with on the taxpayer's behalf: see subsection 6-5(4).

Taxpayer's assessable income includes attributed FIF income under section 529 of the ITAA 1936

87. As a fiscally transparent foreign entity, the foreign income tax is imposed on the taxpayer's share of the profits (as a partner). However, for the purposes of Australian tax law, the amount included in the taxpayer's assessable income is not the taxpayer's share of the profits but is a notional amount of statutory income, being the attributed FIF income under section 529 of the ITAA 1936. As the taxpayer is an attributable taxpayer assessed on attributable income, rather than actual income, the circumstances in which a foreign income tax offset applies to such income are governed by section 770-135.

88. This is consistent with the operation of the previous foreign tax credit provisions and was recognised by Parliament when Division 830 of the ITAA 1997 was enacted. In particular, the 2003 EM noted (at paragraphs 9.123 to 9.131) that fiscally transparent FIFs are generally denied a deduction under section 573 of the ITAA 1936 because the foreign tax is not paid by the FIF and, as a consequence, a foreign tax credit would not be available to the taxpayer whose assessable income includes an amount under section 529 of the ITAA 1936.

89. Section 485AA of the ITAA 1936 was introduced, in part, to overcome this problem of attributable taxpayers not being able to obtain a foreign tax credit in relation to their interest in the fiscally transparent FIF. This section provides an opportunity for taxpayers with an interest in a FIF that is a fiscally transparent foreign entity that does not qualify as a foreign hybrid^[15] to elect for foreign hybrid treatment instead of FIF treatment for that interest. As stated at paragraph 9.33 of the 2003 EM:

This is consistent with the policy intent only to change the treatment of taxpayers with FIF interests where they elect for foreign hybrid treatment on a case by case basis.

By not electing foreign hybrid treatment under section 485AA, taxpayers are subjecting themselves to the same issues that existed prior to the introduction of the foreign hybrid rules.

90. Section 770-135 of the ITAA 1997 sets out all of the rules determining when foreign income tax will be taken to have been paid by a taxpayer in respect of an amount of attributable income included in that taxpayer's assessable income under section 529 of the ITAA 1936. The former foreign tax credit provisions dealing with attributable taxpayers that include attributable income in their assessable income (referred to in former subsection 6AB(3A) of the ITAA 1936) have been re-drafted into a principles-based drafting format in section 770-135.^[16] While there is no single provision in the new law expressly replicating former subsection 6AB(3A) of the ITAA 1936, a combination of section 770-135 and section 770-10 of the ITAA 1997 gives effect to the same policy intent, that is an attributable taxpayer cannot treat any foreign income tax as having been paid in respect of their attributable income unless they satisfy the requirements of section 770-135.

91. This is made clear by paragraphs 1.74 to 1.82 of the 2007 EM which clarifies, in relation to attributable taxpayers with FIF interests, the extent of the change to the foreign tax credit rules and details the circumstances under which such taxpayers will be entitled to a foreign income tax offset. In particular paragraphs 1.76 and 1.77 state:

1.76 In line with current foreign tax credit rules, a foreign tax offset will only be available for taxpayers that are attributed with income under section 529 of the foreign investment fund rules where the calculation method is used to determine their attributable income.

1.77 However, the foreign tax offset in these cases is limited to situations where:

•

the foreign company or foreign trust has paid the tax [ Schedule 1, item 1, paragraph 770-135(3)(c )];

•

the association condition is met (in the case of a foreign company only) [ Schedule 1, item 1, paragraph 770-135(5)(c ); and

•

the calculation method is used [ Schedule 1, item 1, subsection 770-135(6 )].

92. A pre-condition for the operation of section 770-135 of the ITAA 1997 is that the relevant foreign income tax be paid by the FIF.^[17] As the FIF is a fiscally transparent foreign entity, it pays no foreign income tax (rather, tax is imposed at the level of the partner or member). As this pre-condition is not met, there is no foreign income tax that can be treated as having been paid by the attributable taxpayer that can count towards that taxpayer's tax offset in respect of their attributable income. Accordingly, section 770-135 cannot apply to treat the attributable taxpayer in these circumstances as having paid any foreign income tax in respect of the section 529 of the ITAA 1936 amount.

93. In this instance, while it is accepted that the foreign income tax in question is paid by the attributable taxpayer (not the FIF), as section 770-135 is the exclusive code for treating foreign income tax as having been paid in respect of an attributable taxpayer that derives attributable income, subsection 770-10(1) is not satisfied as the requirements of the first-mentioned provision are not met.

94. However if the FIF makes a distribution of income (characterised as a dividend under Australian tax law) to the attributable taxpayer during the notional accounting period of the FIF (that is, before any attribution is made for that year), the amount otherwise attributable under section 529 of the ITAA 1936 is generally reduced by the amount of the distribution under section 530 of the ITAA 1936. In effect, to the extent of the 'interim dividend', this results in the attributable taxpayer being taxed on a 'derivation' basis rather than on an 'attribution' basis, with the effect that any entitlement to a foreign income tax offset in relation to this income is subject to the core rules in section 770-10.

95. If a distribution of income (a FIF attribution account payment) is made by the FIF in a later notional accounting period (that is, after an amount of attributed income has already been included in the taxpayer's assessable income under section 529 of the ITAA 1936), that distribution will be NANE income of the taxpayer under section 23AK of the ITAA 1936 to the extent that it gives rise to a FIF attribution debit.^[18]

96. Where section 23AK of the ITAA 1936 applies, subsection 770-10(2) of the ITAA 1997 allows for a foreign income tax offset to be claimed where the taxpayer has paid foreign income tax in respect of that income.^[19] Accordingly, where a distribution is made by the foreign entity out of previously attributed profits to the attributable taxpayer that is NANE income under section 23AK of the ITAA 1936, and such amount has been taxed on a withholding basis in the hands of the foreign entity, the attributable taxpayer will be entitled to an offset for the foreign income tax paid to the extent that it is paid in respect of the section 23AK income. Note that the 'tax-paid deeming' rules in section 770-130 also apply where the taxpayer derives ordinary or statutory income that is NANE income (see subsection 770-130(1)).

Foreign income tax imposed on amounts included in the notional income of a CFC or a FIF in which the foreign hybrid has an interest

97. As a foreign hybrid is treated as a partnership for Australian income tax law purposes its net income, pursuant to section 90 of the ITAA 1936, is its assessable income less allowable deductions, calculated as if the foreign hybrid were a resident taxpayer.

98. Where that foreign hybrid (in which an Australian resident is a partner) holds an interest in a CFC, the definitions of 'Australian entity', 'Australian partnership' and 'attributable taxpayer' in sections 336, 337 and 361 of the ITAA 1936 respectively, enable section 456 and section 457 of the ITAA 1936 to apply to include an amount of attributable income in the net income of the foreign hybrid for the purposes of Division 5 of Part III of the ITAA 1936.

99. Similarly, where a foreign hybrid holds an interest in a FIF, section 529 of the ITAA 1936 can apply to include an amount in the partnership's net income for the purposes of Division 5 of Part III of the ITAA 1936 due to the operation of sections 485 and 485A of the ITAA 1936.

100. Accordingly, a foreign hybrid can have an interest in a CFC or a FIF, and have attributed CFC or FIF income included in its net income.

101. A foreign income tax offset may be available for foreign income tax, income tax or withholding tax paid by a CFC or FIF in which an entity has an interest, where the requirements of section 770-135 are met. The entity is taken to have paid the foreign income tax (as calculated under subsection 770-135(7)) only if:

•

an amount is included in the entity's assessable income as described in subsection 770-135(2); and

•

the conditions in subsections 770-135(3), 770-135(5) and 770-135(6) are satisfied.

102. Subsection 770-135(2) states:

An amount is included in an entity's assessable income as described in this subsection if:

(a)

the entity is a company and the amount is included under:

(i)

section 456 (a section 456 case ) of the 1936 Act in relation to a *CFC and a statutory accounting period; or

(ii)

section 457 (a section 457 case ) of that Act in relation to a CFC; or

(iii)

section 529 of that Act in relation to a foreign company (within the meaning of Part XI of that Act) (a foreign company case ) in respect of a notional accounting period (within the meaning of that Part) (a notional accounting period ); or

(b)

the amount is included under section 529 of that Act in relation to a foreign trust (within the meaning of Part XI of that Act) (a foreign trust case ) in respect of a notional accounting period.

103. A taxpayer that has an interest in a foreign hybrid that holds a CFC or FIF interest will not satisfy subsection 770-135(2) because the taxpayer's assessable income does not include an amount under sections 456, 457 or 529 of the ITAA 1936. In these circumstances it is the foreign hybrid, not the partner, that is the relevant attributable taxpayer. The taxpayer's assessable income will include their share of the net income of the foreign hybrid under section 92 of the ITAA 1936.

104. Further, the taxpayer could not meet the association condition in subsection 770-135(5) in relation to the CFC or foreign company FIF. The association condition requires the taxpayer to have an 'attribution percentage' of 10% or more in relation to the CFC or the foreign company FIF and, because the taxpayer's interest is held indirectly via the foreign hybrid, the taxpayer will not have an attribution percentage in the CFC or foreign company FIF.^[20]

105. As noted at paragraphs 98 and 99 of this Ruling, the net income of a foreign hybrid (for the purposes of Division 5 of Part III of the ITAA 1936) may include an amount under sections 456, 457 or 529 of the ITAA 1936 in respect of an interest the foreign hybrid has in a CFC or a FIF. However, as paragraph 770-135(2)(a) is only satisfied where the attributable taxpayer is a company, a foreign hybrid (which is treated as a partnership) will not be taken to have paid foreign income tax which has been paid by a CFC or a foreign company FIF in which it holds an interest. Accordingly, a resident taxpayer that has an interest in such a foreign hybrid is not entitled to claim a foreign income tax offset for foreign income tax, income tax or withholding tax paid by a CFC in respect of an amount included in the CFC's notional assessable income or a foreign company FIF in respect of an amount included in the FIF's notional income.

106. On the other hand, where an amount is included in the net income of a foreign hybrid under section 529 of the ITAA 1936 in relation to a foreign trust FIF, paragraph 770-135(2)(b) of the ITAA 1997 is satisfied, regardless of whether the entity is a company. Accordingly, provided the additional conditions contained in subsections 770-135(3), 770-135(5) and 770-135(6) are satisfied, the foreign hybrid will be taken under section 770-135 to have paid the foreign income tax paid by the foreign trust FIF, as calculated in accordance with subsection 770-135(7).

107. In these circumstances, subsection 770-135(8) also applies to increase the amount included in the net income of the foreign hybrid by the amount of tax calculated under subsection 770-135(7). This has the effect of grossing-up the amount of attributed income by the foreign income tax that has already been deducted.^[21]

108. It should also be noted that subsection 770-135(1) states that '[Division 770] applies to an entity as if it had paid an amount of foreign income tax...'. Accordingly, if subsection 770-135(1) applies to treat a foreign hybrid as having paid the foreign income tax that has been paid by a foreign trust FIF in which the foreign hybrid has an interest, the foreign hybrid is taken to have paid that foreign income tax for all purposes of Division 770, including section 770-130.

109. As noted at paragraph 103 of this Ruling, a resident taxpayer that holds an interest in a foreign hybrid that in turn has an interest in a foreign trust FIF cannot be taken to have paid foreign income tax under section 770-135. However, because the foreign hybrid may be taken to have paid such foreign income tax, section 770-130 can apply to deem the resident taxpayer with an interest in the foreign hybrid to have paid that foreign income tax because it is treated as having been paid by the foreign hybrid in respect of the taxpayer's share of the net income.

110. In these circumstances, the resident taxpayer is taken to have paid the foreign income tax to the extent that the taxpayer's share of the net income relates to the attributed FIF income included in the net income of the foreign hybrid. This is because such foreign income tax is taken to have been paid by the foreign hybrid 'under an arrangement with the taxpayer' for the purposes of subsection 770-130(2). The example provided in the legislation following subsection 770-130(2) indicates that foreign income tax paid by a partnership should be deemed to have been paid by a partner. Paragraph 1.106 of the 2007 EM also provides support for the Commissioner's interpretation, in stating:

...This is distinguishable from the situation in which a partnership or trust pays foreign income tax on partnership or trust income that is taxed in the hands of the resident taxpayer under Australian tax law on a flow-through basis, thus reducing the amount distributed or credited to the taxpayer. In these cases, while the partnership or trust pays the foreign income tax, it is the resident partner or beneficiary that bears the economic burden (under Australian law) of that foreign income tax.

111. Further, if section 770-130 did not apply to deem the resident taxpayer to have paid the foreign income tax that has been paid in respect of its share of the attributed FIF income, the requirement to gross-up the foreign hybrid's net income under subsection 770-135(8) would result in the taxpayer being denied both a deduction and an offset for the foreign income tax imposed on the foreign trust FIF. This outcome would clearly be at odds with the intended operation of subsection 770-135(8), which should apply only in circumstances where a taxpayer is entitled to a foreign income tax offset: see paragraph 1.97 of the 2007 EM.

112. Therefore a resident taxpayer that has an interest in a foreign hybrid, which in turn holds an interest in a foreign trust FIF, is entitled to claim a foreign income tax offset for foreign income tax, income tax or withholding tax paid by the foreign trust FIF in respect of an amount included in its notional income.

Tax imposed on distributions made by a CFC or a FIF to a foreign hybrid

113. Where a taxpayer holds an interest in a foreign hybrid which in turn holds an interest in a CFC, and the CFC makes a distribution or dividend payment to the foreign hybrid, the taxpayer may be entitled to a foreign income tax offset for any withholding tax imposed at source on the distribution.

114. As discussed at paragraph 67 of this Ruling, where the taxpayer's assessable income includes a share of the net income of a foreign hybrid which includes a distribution paid to the foreign hybrid upon which foreign income tax has been withheld at source, section 770-130 will treat the taxpayer as if it had paid foreign income tax in respect of an amount included in the taxpayer's assessable income, and thereby entitle the taxpayer to a foreign income tax offset under subsection 770-10(1).

115. However, where a CFC makes a distribution to the foreign hybrid in circumstances where an amount has previously been included in the net income of the foreign hybrid under sections 456 or 457 of the ITAA 1936, the amount will be treated as NANE income of the taxpayer under section 23AI of the ITAA 1936, to the extent of the amount previously attributed. This is achieved through Division 4 of Part X of the ITAA 1936 which concerns attribution accounts.

116. The attribution account rules in Division 4 of Part X of the ITAA 1936 apply where an interest in a CFC is held by a partnership to ensure that a resident taxpayer with an interest in the partnership will obtain the benefit of section 23AI of the ITAA 1936. This is achieved through a combination of provisions that ensure that attribution credits and debits (which arise when income is attributed and when it is distributed respectively) arise for the resident taxpayer, rather than for the partnership that is the attributable taxpayer under Part X of the ITAA 1936.

117. Similar rules in Division 19 of Part XI of the ITAA 1936 apply to interests in FIFs so that later distributions can be treated as NANE income under section 23AK of the ITAA 1936.

118. Accordingly, where a foreign hybrid includes an amount in its assessable income under sections 456 or 457 of the ITAA 1936, an attribution credit arises for the resident taxpayer who holds an interest in the foreign hybrid: see subsection 371(6) of the ITAA 1936.^[22] As a consequence, when a subsequent distribution is paid to the foreign hybrid by the CFC, the taxpayer's share of that distribution that would be included in the taxpayer's assessable income under section 92 of the ITAA 1936 is NANE income of the taxpayer under section 23AI of the ITAA 1936: see paragraphs 23AI(1)(d), 365(1)(b), and 371(1)(d) and section 372 of the ITAA 1936.^[23]

119. As the 'tax-paid deeming' rules in section 770-130 also apply where the taxpayer (that is the resident partner in the foreign hybrid) derives ordinary or statutory income that is NANE income (see subsection 770-130(1)), the taxpayer will be treated as having paid the foreign income tax imposed on the distribution to the extent that it give rise to such NANE income in the hands of the taxpayer.

120. In these circumstances, subsection 770-10(2) enables the taxpayer to claim a foreign income tax offset for foreign income tax taken to have been paid in respect of the taxpayer's section 23AI of the ITAA 1936 amount, which arises from distributions made by a CFC to a foreign hybrid in which the taxpayer holds an interest.

121. The same outcome arises for an interest held in a FIF via an interposed foreign hybrid.

The impact of Australia's tax treaties on the availability of foreign income tax offsets

122. The availability of a foreign income tax offset may be affected by the application of Australia's tax treaties contained in Schedules to the Agreements Act. Subsection 4(1) of the Agreements Act provides that the ITAA 1936 and the ITAA 1997 must be read as one with the Agreements Act.

123. The elimination of double taxation articles of Australia's tax treaties generally provide that where tax has been imposed by a foreign country in respect of income from sources in that country and in accordance with the particular tax treaty, a credit against tax payable in Australia on that income will be allowed under the law of Australia.

124. This includes situations where there is a difference in treatment of income derived from sources in the other country and Australia that arise because the foreign entity is treated as fiscally transparent under the law of the other State but as a company for Australian tax law purposes.^[24] This type of conflict which arises because of domestic law differences between the two countries to a tax treaty is commonly referred to as a Conflict of Qualification.

125. The Commissioner's view expressed at paragraph 104 of Taxation Ruling TR 2001/13 is that the OECD Model Tax Convention and Commentary may be considered in interpreting tax treaties. The 2008 OECD Commentary on Articles 23A and 23B at paragraphs 32.1 to 32.7 discusses the concept of a Conflict of Qualification, concluding that where the difference in treatment is solely referable to differences in the respective domestic laws of the State of source and State of residence of the taxpayer, it is considered that the State of source has taxed the income in accordance with the Convention and accordingly the State of residence is obliged to provide relief in accordance with the relevant article of the Model Convention.^[25]

126. Therefore, to the extent that the foreign country taxes income in accordance with the Convention, as interpreted by it as the State of source and gives rise to a Conflict of Qualification referable solely to differences in domestic tax laws, such tax will constitute foreign income tax within the meaning of section 770-15 and relief in the form of a foreign income tax offset may therefore be available in accordance with, and to the extent allowed, under section 770-10.

127. Conversely, where a resident taxpayer derives income that has borne foreign income tax in circumstances where the foreign country imposes the tax other than in accordance with a tax treaty with Australia, relief from double taxation is to be obtained by seeking a refund of the foreign income tax (or similar relief) from the foreign country that imposed it.^[26]

128. In these circumstances a foreign income tax offset under Division 770 is not available because the relevant foreign income tax, imposed other than in accordance with the tax treaty, is not considered to be 'foreign income tax' within the meaning of section 770-15. This is supported by the Note to section 770-15 which states:

Foreign income tax includes only that which has been correctly imposed in accordance with the relevant foreign law, or, where the foreign jurisdiction has a tax treaty with Australia (having the force of law under the International Tax Agreements Act 1953), has been correctly imposed in accordance with that treaty.

Application of former Division 18 of Part III

129. The explanation at paragraphs 60 to 128 of this Ruling deals with the application of the foreign income tax offset rules in Division 770 to circumstances involving the imposition of foreign income tax on income derived from investing in foreign hybrid entities. These rules have effect for income years commencing on or after 1 July 2008.

130. For income years commencing before 1 July 2008, generally equivalent relief from double taxation was achieved under the foreign tax credit rules in former Division 18 of Part III of the ITAA 1936.

131. To the extent that the rules in Division 770 effectively replicate the rules in former Division 18 of Part III of the ITAA 1936 then where, in the circumstances set out in this explanation, a taxpayer is entitled to a foreign income tax offset, it would normally be expected that the same set of circumstances arising in an income year commencing prior to 1 July 2008 would also lead to the taxpayer being entitled to a foreign tax credit under former Division 18 of Part III of the ITAA 1936.

Appendix 2 - Detailed contents list

132. The following is a detailed contents list for this Ruling:

Previously released in draft form as TR 2009/D1

References

ATO references:
NO 2008/8842

Related Rulings/Determinations:

TR 2000/16
TR 2001/13
TR 2006/10
TD 2006/52

Subject References:
controlled foreign companies
foreign hybrid company
foreign hybrid limited partnership
foreign hybrids
foreign income
foreign income tax offsets
foreign investment funds

Legislative References:
ITAA 1936
ITAA 1936 6AB(3A)
ITAA 1936 23AH
ITAA 1936 23AI
ITAA 1936 23AI(1)(d)
ITAA 1936 23AJ
ITAA 1936 23AK
ITAA 1936 23AK(1)(d)
ITAA 1936 44
ITAA 1936 90
ITAA 1936 92
ITAA 1936 94L
ITAA 1936 94M
ITAA 1936 160AFCD
ITAA 1936 160AFCJ
ITAA 1936 336
ITAA 1936 337
ITAA 1936 361
ITAA 1936 362
ITAA 1936 365(1)(b)
ITAA 1936 371(1)(d)
ITAA 1936 371(6)
ITAA 1936 372
ITAA 1936 456
ITAA 1936 457
ITAA 1936 485
ITAA 1936 485A
ITAA 1936 485AA
ITAA 1936 529
ITAA 1936 530
ITAA 1936 573
ITAA 1936 581
ITAA 1936 603(1)(a)
ITAA 1936 603(1)(c)
ITAA 1936 605(1)(d)
ITAA 1936 605(8)
ITAA 1936 606
ITAA 1936 Pt III Div 5
ITAA 1936 Pt III Div 5A
ITAA 1936 Pt III Div 18
ITAA 1936 Pt X
ITAA 1936 Pt X Div 4
ITAA 1936 Pt XI
ITAA 1936 Pt XI Div 2
ITAA 1936 Pt XI Div 3
ITAA 1936 Pt XI Div 4
ITAA 1936 Pt XI Div 5
ITAA 1936 Pt XI Div 6
ITAA 1936 Pt XI Div 7
ITAA 1936 Pt XI Div 8
ITAA 1936 Pt XI Div 9
ITAA 1936 Pt XI Div 10
ITAA 1936 Pt XI Div 11
ITAA 1936 Pt XI Div 11A
ITAA 1936 Pt XI Div 12
ITAA 1936 Pt XI Div 13
ITAA 1936 Pt XI Div 14
ITAA 1936 Pt XI Div 19
ITAA 1997
ITAA 1997 6-5(4)
ITAA 1997 6-10
ITAA 1997 Div 770
ITAA 1997 770-5
ITAA 1997 770-5(1)
ITAA 1997 770-5(2)
ITAA 1997 770-10
ITAA 1997 770-10(1)
ITAA 1997 770-10(2)
ITAA 1997 770-130
ITAA 1997 770-130(1)
ITAA 1997 770-130(2)
ITAA 1997 770-135
ITAA 1997 770-135(1)
ITAA 1997 770-135(2)
ITAA 1997 770-135(2)(a)
ITAA 1997 770-135(2)(b)
ITAA 1997 770-135(3)
ITAA 1997 770-135(5)
ITAA 1997 770-135(6)
ITAA 1997 770-135(7)
ITAA 1997 770-135(8)
ITAA 1997 770-15
ITAA 1997 770-15(1)
ITAA 1997 770-75
ITAA 1997 770-80
ITAA 1997 Div 830
ITAA 1997 830-10(1)
ITAA 1997 830-10(1)(a)
ITAA 1997 830-10(1)(b)
ITAA 1997 830-10(1)(c)
ITAA 1997 830-10(1)(d)
ITAA 1997 830-10(1)(e)
ITAA 1997 830-15(1)
ITAA 1997 830-15(1)(a)
ITAA 1997 830-15(1)(b)
ITAA 1997 830-15(1)(c)
ITAA 1997 830-15(1)(d)
ITAA 1997 Subdiv 830-C
ITAA 1997 Subdiv 830-D
ITAA 1997 995-1
TAA 1953 Pt IVC
TAA 1953 Sch 1
International Tax Agreements Act 1953 4(1)
International Tax Agreements Act 1953 Sch 2

Case References:
Construction Industry Long Service Leave Board v. Irving
(1997) 74 FCR 587

Commissioner of Taxation v. Scully
[2000] HCA 6
(2000) 201 CLR 148
2000 ATC 4111
(2000) 43 ATR 718
State Government Insurance Office (Qld) v. Rees & Anor (Liquidators of KD Morris & Sons Pty Ltd)
(1979) 144 CLR 549
Technical Products Pty Ltd v. State Government Insurance Office (Qld)
(1989) 167 CLR 45

Other References:
The Explanatory Memorandum to the Taxation Laws Amendment Bill (No. 7) 2003
The Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment (2007 Measures No. 4) Bill 2007
OECD Committee on Fiscal Affairs for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Model Tax Convention on Income and Capital, Paris, 2008 Version